A Harvard Law Review Foreword shows why beating CMS on set-asides may help only one claimant.
Copyright
Monday, November 9, 2026
Saturday, November 7, 2026
One Payer, Fifty Systems
A Democratic Congress revives Medicare for All, yet the bill still holds workers' compensation liable for treatment.
Friday, November 6, 2026
Right Result, Wrong Clock
Thursday, November 5, 2026
Premiums Fall, Benefits Rise
New Jersey employers will pay 1.9% less for workers' compensation coverage in 2027, while injured workers receive modest benefit gains and a frozen floor.
Wednesday, November 4, 2026
The Statehouse Wave Arrives
A Democratic landslide reshapes the outlook for workers' compensation, workers' rights, and workplace safety.
Tuesday, November 3, 2026
Residency Is Not Enough
A New Jersey surgeon, a New Jersey patient, a New Jersey operating room, and still no New Jersey jurisdiction.
Monday, October 26, 2026
Set-Asides Without Safe Harbor
In May 2013, this blog reported that a New Jersey court had done what the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) declined to do. In Duhamell v. Renal Care Group East, Inc., 431 N.J. Super. 93 (Law Div. 2012), the Superior Court in Atlantic County approved two self-administered Medicare set-asides after CMS refused to review them, citing limited resources. Thirteen years later, CMS still will not grant a safe harbor outside its own review process, but it now sees nearly every set-aside that gets created. For injured workers in New Jersey, that shift changes the calculus of every lump-sum settlement.