National Health Leaps Ahead on Agenda

It should no surprise to anyone that the Obama Transition is already targeting national health care as a first year agenda item. With Senator Edward Kennedy and the Clintons anticipated to be major participants in the new Obama Administration, the health care issue has now leaped to forefront.

Senator Kennedy's return to the Senate this week coincided with his announcement of the formation of 3 working groups to assist in the development of heath care legislation. He announced the following participants to his team: Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.); Sen.Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.) and Tom Harkin (D-Iowa). They planned a meeting for today in an effort to plan out the immediate effort. This signals that health care reform will emanate from the Congress and not The White House.

Insurance company reaction was immediate. The carriers offered full medical coverage for pre-existing coverage providing that there was a global requirement for all to be insured.

As this program rolls out it is most certainly anticipated that workers' compensation medical coverage be included in the global effort. Studies have long shown that the litigation progress delays the delivery of benefits, increases administrative costs and depletes much needed medical resources from health research efforts.

The Rush to Follow Oregon

Praising of the Oregon workers' compensation system continues in earnest by the insurance industry. The Workers' Compensation Research Institute's (WCRI), Duncan Ballantyne, presented the winning factors about the Oregon system at a seminar to reform the Oklahoma system.

A reform movement has been launched in Oklahoma to overhaul the Oklahoma system. Orgeon contines to have very low workers' compensation rates and utilizes an administrative system to resolve work related claims. Legislation has been authored by Rep. Mark McCullogh to abolish the adversarial system in Oklahoma.

Workers' Compensation Medical Benefits are in Critical Condition

Now that Barach Obama is a going to be at the helm of the US, greater attention is being focused on the need for a national health care system incorporating workers’ compensation medical coverage. With private insurance companies failing, unemployment increasing, the cost of medical care soaring, more attention has now been placed on the elimination of medical care as a workers’ compensation benefit paid by Industry.

It is not all surprising that Dr. Peter Barth reported to the WCRI Conference in Boston, that workers’ compensation programs may be swept up into a national health care system. He reminds us that this was attempted in the Clinton proposal. The enactment of such a proposal looks even more urgent now.

The medical system overall is now being stressed by: an aging workforce; medical conditions manifested by stress and aging; consumerism in health care; the attempt to shift costs from major medical plans and CMS to workers’ compensation; new and expensive treatment modalities, procedures and pharmaceutical products,and the expansion of palliative and “end of life care.” It is anticipated that the average cost may amount to $500.000 per claim.

The workers’ compensation system just can’t deliver medical treatment quickly and cheaply enough. The systems are frough with administrative costs delay. It is adversarial requiring legal timetables of investigation, litigation, adjudication and appeals. The progress of disease is not subject to court rules or judicial administration. Immediate and emergent medical treatment protocols follow a biological timetable not a legal one.

National health reform that embodies workers’ compensation as an element is a long awaited solution to coordinate and advance the delivery of health care to all Americans. Old, inefficient and archaic systems need to be abandoned if progress is to advance. Moving forward to the inclusion of workers' compensation into a universal and nationalized program for health care is an important and innovative change. The change is crticial and necessary to advance with science, the economy and the social structure of America.

“Going Green”-Alternate Dispute Resolution Proposed for Comp

A proposal has been introduced in the NJ Assembly formalizing an alternate dispute resolution (ADR) program for workers’ compensation. The proposal would allow the establishment of such a system through collective bargaining units and insurance carriers and group self-insurance plans.

Such programs have been utilized throughout the United States for decades and are commonly called “carve-out” programs. Labor and Industry have found them cost-effective and an expeditious manner of handling work related benefits. The cost of the NJ system, has been estimated at $1.8 Billion. The Star Ledger, in a series of articles entitled “Waiting in Pain,” highlighted the frustrations that have emerged because of delays encountered in the present system. The series focused on delays caused by multiple and fragment hearings.

The proposal has been introduced at a time when workers’ compensation systems and Industry as well as injured workers are seeking ways to reduce the spiraling costs of the administration of workers’ compensation and to enhance the delivery of benefits. Workers’ Compensation is struggling to reduce costs and employ environmentally friendly systems. The ADR program is an attempt to reduce costs and reduce environmental impact.

“Going Green” is a concept now being utilized by administrative and judicial systems throughout the country. One company, CourtCall®, utilizes telephonic conferences to avoid court appearances to help save the environment. Workers' Compensation claims in NJ require multiple appearances of the parties for both pre-trial conferences and hearings over extended periods of time.

Some reviewers have suggested elimination of the high cost of workers’ compensation program entirely as a value no longer justifying tort immunity. Instituting an ADR system, in a time of economic stress and increasing environmental costs associated with administration of a formal system, may offer an option to explore.

CMS Discusses Asbestos Claims MSP Reporting Requirements

CMS confirmed in a national telephone conference today that in workers' compensation claims where the toxic exposure, ie. asbestos exposure, ceased prior to December 5, 1980, reimbursement or reporting was not required. On the telephone conference call mandatory reporting requirements for liability insurance, no-fault and workers' compensation were discussed and questions solicited and from the participants..

The CMS position was validation of prior informal memorandum in circulation concerning asbestos exposures. The rationale for the opinion has been previously bean based upon the fact that the Medicare Secondary Payer Act was not enacted until that date.

The telephone conference call was scheduled by CMS in an effort to clear the air about its recent rules and suggestions concerning the implementation of the recent working requirements mandated by Congress. 42 U.S>C. 1395y(b)(7)).

Asbestos Dealer of Death - Canada

The Canadian delegation to the Rotterdam Convention was able to lobby effectively to prohibit a ban on asbestos for another two years. The Canadian mines will continue to churn out the killer fiber and ship it to unsuspecting countries as a result of an effective major lobbying effort of the Canadians to sway the votes of India, Pakistan, Vietnam and the Philippines.

Despite a report from an independent committee of scientist urging the ban of chrysotile asbestos this year, the effort to ban asbestos failed. Chrysotile asbestos is classified as a known human carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer and more than 40 countries have already banned its sale.

It has been reported that last year alone Canada sold $77 million to developing countries around the world. Unfortunately the cost for medical care caused by asbestos related disease far exceeds that value and the loss of life is priceless. Shielded by national laws the Canadian entities have protected themselves from recovery. Exporting disease for economic greed is beyond human comprehension and is shameful. Who are the Canadians kidding, asbestos kills!

Injured Workers' RICO Claim to Proceed Against Employer and Insurance Company

In a landmark decision of immense national significance, the US Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a RICO claim brought by injured workers against their employer, insurance carrier and employer medical expert could proceed. Several injured workers brought the Federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) against their employer, Crawford & Company and [cut-off treatment doctor] Dr. Saul Margules.

The allegations included that, ".....Cassens and Crawford deliberately selected and paid unqualified doctors, including Margules, to give fraudulent medical opinions that would support the denial of worker’s compensation benefits, and that defendants ignored other medical evidence in denying them benefits. The plaintiffs claimed that the defendants made fraudulent communications amongst themselves and to the plaintiffs by mail and wire in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 1343, which serve as the predicate acts for their RICO claims."

The decision authored by Judge Karen Nelson Moore held "...that plaintiffs’ RICO claims [may go forward] because the WDCA [Michigan Workers' Compensation Disability Act] does not preempt their RICO claims and because plaintiffs have sufficiently pleaded a pattern of racketeering activity given that reliance is not an element of a civil RICO fraud claim."

The Court concluded, "...Our conclusion that worker’s compensation benefits are not insurance and our conclusion that the WDCA was not "enacted . . . for the purpose of regulating the business of insurance," each independently foreclose the defendants’ argument that the WDCA reverse preempts RICO under the McCarran-Ferguson Act.

Of additional signifiance is that sitting by designation on the panel with Judge Moore and Judge Gibbons, was The Honorable Harold A. Ackerman, US District Court Judge for the District of NJ. Judge Ackerman has long and knowledge history of RICO actions was a former NJ Workers' Compensation Judge.

Brown, et al. v. Casses Transport Co., et al., 6th Cir. 2008, Decided October 23, 2008