The case arose out of a household contact's exposure to beryllium brought home on the employee's cloths. At the time of the exposure, 30 years ago, the household contact was the fiance of the employee.
"The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit having certified to the Supreme Court the following question of law pursuant to Rule 2:12-1:Three States have adopted the rule that the employer's duty extends to household contacts who are not spouses, ie. children and parents of the employee.
And the Court having determined to accept the question as certified."
Does the premises liability rule set forth in Olivo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 186N.J. 394, 895 A.2d 1143 (2006), extend beyond providing a duty of care to the spouse of a person exposed to toxic substances on the landowner's premises, and, if so, what are the limits of that liability rule and the associated scope of duty?
Click here to view NJ Supreme Court Video 4/25/2016 (Available for 30 days, then see below)
Click here for general information about accessing the NJ Supreme Court Video Archive
Case History (Google Scholar):
Schwartz v. ACCURATUS CORP., 118 A. 3d 347 - … - NJ: Supreme Court
Schwartz v. Accuratus Corp., 7 F. Supp. 3d 490 - 2014 - Dist. Court, ED
Schwartz v. ACCURATUS CORPORATION, 2014 - Dist. Court, ED
Related articles:
Mar 28, 2015 ... A $1.6 Million award for a household contact of an asbestos worker was affirmed by a NJ Court of Appeals. The child of a Shulton employee ...
workers-compensation.blogspot.com
|
Nov 29, 2013 ... One would think that we woud have learned of the serious medical problems caused by the consequences of being a household contact to an ...
workers-compensation.blogspot.com
|
Oct 11, 2011 ... Labels: asbestos; brakes; chrysotile; mechanic; occupation; epidemiology; mesothelioma, Asthma, Bystander Exposure, household contact, ...
workers-compensation.blogspot.com
|