The New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, ruled that a third-party lien can remain unresolved until the workers’ compensation claim is adjudicated.
Background
On October 23, 2019, the defendant, Darshelle Joseph, was injured during the course of his employment with the plaintiff, New Jersey Transit Corp. (NJ Transit).
Joseph filed a workers’ compensation action against NJ Transit and a third-party action against the tortfeasor involved in the accident (the “underlying action”).
NJ Transit’s workers’ compensation insurance carrier notified Joseph of its legal right to recover all money paid on his workers’ compensation claim from the third-party potentially liable for his injuries.
Issue
The employer (NJ Transit) challenged a trial court order that denied its application for satisfaction of its worker’s compensation lien upon settlement of Joseph’s action against the third-party tortfeasor. N.J.S.A. 34:15-40.
The central question was whether NJ Transit’s application was premature.
Court’s Decision
The Appellate Division vacated and remanded the order.
The court held that NJ Transit’s application for satisfaction of its worker’s compensation lien was premature.
“There is no requirement the employer's lien must be paid following recovery from a third-party tortfeasor. Indeed, it cannot be fully satisfied until any associated worker's compensation action is finalized and the employer's liability under the Act is determined. Thus, an employer's unperfected statutory lien is not required to be satisfied immediately upon the injured employee's recovery from a third-party tortfeasor.”
“…The matter is remanded to the trial court to ensure the worker's compensation lien is protected until the worker's compensation action is resolved. As long as the funds to pay the lien are protected—either deposited into court or deposited in an attorney trust account—there is no prejudice to NJ Transit.”
Amount in Controversy
NJ Transit had paid Joseph a total of $7,112.90 in workers’ compensation benefits, including wage loss payments and medical expenses.
Joseph settled with his uninsured motorist (UM) insurance carrier for $14,000 in the underlying action.
Conclusion
The case highlights the complexity of coordinating worker’s compensation claims with third-party actions.
Employers and injured employees need to navigate these situations carefully to ensure fair resolution.
New Jersey Transit Corp. v. Joseph, NJ: Appellate Div. 2024, Decided March 19, 2024.
UNPUBLISHED OPINION. CHECK COURT RULES BEFORE CITING.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
This opinion shall not “constitute precedent or be binding upon any court.” Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
ORDER NOW
....
*Jon L. Gelman of Wayne, NJ, is the author of NJ Workers’ Compensation Law (West-Thomson-Reuters) and co-author of the national treatise Modern Workers’ Compensation Law (West-Thomson-Reuters). For over five decades, the Law Offices of Jon Gelman 1.973.696.7900
jon@gelmans.com has represented injured workers and their families who have suffered occupational illnesses and diseases.
Blog: Workers' Compensation
LinkedIn: JonGelman
LinkedIn Group: Injured Workers Law & Advocacy Group
Author: "Workers' Compensation Law" West-Thomson-Reuters
Mastodon:@gelman@mstdn.social
Blue Sky: jongelman@bsky.social
© 2024 Jon L Gelman. All rights reserved.
Attorney Advertising
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
