Recently three injured workers were honored at the Comp Laude Gala put on by trade publication Workers’ Compensation Central. The event included a panel with the catastrophically injured workers who overcame their injuries.
Copyright
(c) 2010-2025 Jon L Gelman, All Rights Reserved.
Showing posts with label Ontario. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ontario. Show all posts
Wednesday, October 23, 2019
The problem with workers’ compensation award ceremonies
Today's guest author is Jon Rehm, Esq. of the Nebraska bar.
Thursday, December 19, 2013
O Canada! Ecuadorians Win Right to Pursue Chevron North of the Border
Plaintiffs have sought to enforce an $9.2 Billion environmental contamination verdict obtained in Ecuador against Chevron Corp in Canada. Today's post is shared from http://blogs.wsj.com/law,
Here’s an interesting quirk of big litigation that may hit a multinational company: A plaintiff can try to enforce a favorable judgment in just about any country in which the defendant has significant assets.
That can create a few headaches for defendants, who might have to chase a plaintiff from Cambodia to Chad to China to keep its assets from being seized.
Chevron Corp. on Tuesday got a tough reminder of this lesson, when an appellate court in Canada ruled that winners of a $9.5 billion judgment against the oil giant in Ecuador could try to recover the assets in the Great White North.
Writes the WSJ’s Dan Gilbert:
The plaintiffs, residents of Ecuador’s jungles, are seeking to enforce a 2011 judgment against Chevron by confiscating its properties in other countries where it operates. In May, a lower court in Ontario held that the Ecuadorean judgment didn’t apply to Chevron subsidiaries like the one that owns its assets in Canada, halting the plaintiffs’ lawsuit against the company there.
The Court of Appeal in Ontario reversed the lower court’s ruling.
At points in its opinion, the panel seemed put out by Chevron’s litigation tactics.
“For 20 years, Chevron has contested the legal proceedings of every court involved in this litigation – in...
[Click here to see the rest of this post]
Here’s an interesting quirk of big litigation that may hit a multinational company: A plaintiff can try to enforce a favorable judgment in just about any country in which the defendant has significant assets.
That can create a few headaches for defendants, who might have to chase a plaintiff from Cambodia to Chad to China to keep its assets from being seized.
Chevron Corp. on Tuesday got a tough reminder of this lesson, when an appellate court in Canada ruled that winners of a $9.5 billion judgment against the oil giant in Ecuador could try to recover the assets in the Great White North.
Writes the WSJ’s Dan Gilbert:
The plaintiffs, residents of Ecuador’s jungles, are seeking to enforce a 2011 judgment against Chevron by confiscating its properties in other countries where it operates. In May, a lower court in Ontario held that the Ecuadorean judgment didn’t apply to Chevron subsidiaries like the one that owns its assets in Canada, halting the plaintiffs’ lawsuit against the company there.
The Court of Appeal in Ontario reversed the lower court’s ruling.
At points in its opinion, the panel seemed put out by Chevron’s litigation tactics.
“For 20 years, Chevron has contested the legal proceedings of every court involved in this litigation – in...
[Click here to see the rest of this post]
Related articles
- Merck agrees to proposed $27.7 mln settlement over Fosamax lawsuits (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- The Next Wave: N.H.L. Players Sue League Over Head Injuries (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Hip Replacement Lawsuit: ASR Settlement ($2.5 Billion) Benefits Announced (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Canada top court upholds ban on privately labeled drugs (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Five Former N.F.L. Players Sue the Chiefs Over Head Injuries (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)