Quebec's The Selling of Asbestos Called "Immoral"

The Montreal Gazette has called for a ban on the sale of asbestos. Asbestos continues to be  mined in Quebec.

Asbestos is a long known carcinogen causally related to asbestos, lung cancer and  mesothelioma (a rare and fatal disease.) A major effort has been underway internationally to ban asbestos as the epidemic of asbestos disease continues to be rampant.  Injured workers and their families have inundated workers' compensation system throughout the US highlighting insufficiencies in the system to provide adequate benefits and straining the traditional tort system.

In an editorial the paper stated, "The day should be long gone when a civilized society such as Quebec's knowingly sells a carcinogenic substance - asbestos - to a poorer, developing country such as India."" In an interview with an Indian publication in December, New Democratic Party MP Pat Martin said, 'Asbestos and tobacco are the two industries where the industry knows well it is killing people, but it survives by junk science and aggressive lobbying of politicians.'"

"A coalition of more than 100 scientific experts from 28 countries sent a letter to Charest [Quebec's Premier] last week, on the eve of his trade-mission visit to India, pointing out that Quebec is facing an uspurge of asbestos-related illness. Asbestos is to blame, the province's workers' compensation board says, in 60 per cent of the 104 cases of Quebec workers who died from work-related causes in a seven-month period last year."

Click here to read more about asbestos and workers' compensation. 

To read more about asbestos litigation click here.

Asbestos: Not Banned in US But Use Declining

The use of asbestos, a known carcinogen, is not yet banned  in the US, but the use of it continues to decline. Asbestos has not been mine in the US since 2002 and therefore the country is dependent upon imports for asbestos products. 

The US Geological Survey reports that asbestos consumption in 2009 was 715 metric tons. In 2008 1,460 metric toms were estimated to be imported. Roofing products account for 65% of US consumption while other applications account for 35%. Over 89% of asbestos used in the US is imported from Canada.

The US government no longer stockpiles asbestos for use. It had been widely use in Word War II as a strategic commodity to insulate ships. Many exposures occurred in naval yards and to Navy personnel. 

Asbestos is the sole cause of mesothelioma, a rare but fatal asbestos disease. It is also causally related to many cancers, including lung cancer, and to asbestosis. One of the last known asbestos mines in the US was in Libby MT, which has now been declared to be a Super Fund site and asbestos there has been declared to be "a public health emergency."  Under the recently passed Senate health care reform legislation, Libby MT has been afforded medical benefits under the Medicare program.

While the US has not yet banned the use of asbestos, other nations have, The Republic of South Korea has enacted the final stage of a ban on the the use of asbestos manufactured products as of September 2009. Under the ban, asbestos may not be used to manufacture any children's products or products which asbestos particles may come loose and contact the skin.

Substitutes are available or the use of asbestos fiber. The US Geological Survey reports, "Numerous materials substitute for asbestos in products. Substitutes include calcium silicate, carbon fiber, cellulose fiber, ceramic fiber, glass fiber, steel fiber, wollastonite, and several organic fibers, such as aramid, polyethylene, polypropylene, and polytetrafluoroethylene. Several nonfibrous minerals or rocks, such as perlite, serpentine, silica, and talc, are considered to be possible asbestos substitutes for products in which the reinforcement properties of fibers were not required.."

Many workers, their families and their dependents have filed workers' compensation against former employers and civil actions against the asbestos manufacturers, suppliers and health research groups for the damages including the reimbursement of medical costs. Asbestos litigation has been called "The longest running tort in history."

Click here to read more about asbestos litigation.

Congress, Health Care & Unintended Consequences

This past week some very dramatic things happened in the workers’ compensation world. The US Senate moved forward on initiating a floor debate on health care. At the same time, a group of workers’ compensation scholars met in Washington DC to discuss the future of workers’ compensation and the interplay with social security disability.

 Highlights of the NASI (National Academy of Social Insurance) conference convened in Washington were findings presented by eminent leaders in the field. Professor John Burton, Rutgers University, pointed out that newly created barriers to workers’ compensation were pushing more injured workers to the Social Security disability system for benefits. This reflects a phenomenon that occurred in the late 1970’s when a study commissioned by the US Department of Labor and conducted by Mt. Sinai Hospitals’ Environmental Sciences Laboratory, revealed that the inadequate benefit delivery system of workers’ compensation for asbestos related illness, was forcing injured workers and their families into the civil justice arena for adequate compensation.

The problems have not changed in decades; they have only gotten worse, maturing into a system that is in critical condition and on life support. In 1980 Irving J. Selikoff, M.D. reported, “There has been widespread acknowledgement of significant problems with disability compensation for workers in the United States. One major area of concern has been the shortcomings with regard to occupational disease. Whatever the suitability of current workers’ compensation systems in the 50 states for injuries and work accidents, there has been little disagreement about the inadequacies of such systems for workers who become disabled by illness or, if they die, for their surviving dependents.”

Complex questions continue to exist between the scientific and legal communities as to the path to be taken. Barriers placed into the path of recovery, including pre-existing and co-existing conditions, which result in limited or delayed recovery and major shifting of the economic responsibility upon the public/private benefit systems need to be removed. The unspoken social consequences continue as a silent epidemic as families and survivors struggle in silence.

Looking backward over the noble experiment in California which turned sour, Tom Rankin, former President of the California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO, expressed his regret of the reform. The former Labor leader theorized that the results were “unintended consequences.” Indeed he is looking forward to solutions springing forth in a “public option” embedded into the national health care legislation.

Some participants at the NASI conference alleged a major shortcoming of the California workers’ compensation legislative reform effort. Doug Kim, a lobbyist for the claimant’s attorneys, disclosed that the injured workers’ advocates were not invited to partake in the discussion that lead up to crafting the initial drafts of the 2004 California reform legislation SB 899.

History reveals, that when the theoretical reforms were practically applied, the injured workers suffered serious setbacks. If these were in fact “unintended consequences,” then one must consider the active involvement of all stakeholders when looking forward to solutions. The courts in California have consistently upheld challenges to the inequitable results, pointing to the legislative intent to reduce costs. Absent from the discussions of the presenters were practical systemic applications to improve the present system. The “blood and guts” of the traumatic, delay and denial, struggles of navigating in a crippled workers’ compensation system, in California and elsewhere, is verification that change is mandated.

As North Carolina attorney, Valerie A. Johnson, so eloquently remarked, “workers’ compensation is supposed to be a simple system.” The process has now been obstructed by encroaching elements of fault, contributory negligence, apportionment of pre-existing conditions and difficulties of the element of time, manifested by latent diseases unknown to the fathers of the system a century ago. The advance of medical science has brought forth new and innovated modalities that have contributed to soaring medical costs. The convergence of these issues has generated higher administrative costs.

Pecuniary Industry motives have worked adversely to improving safety in the workplace. The need for workers’ compensation would be minimized by adopting a safer occupational environment. Under reporting of workplace accidents continue as the Government Accountability Office announced. Nebraska Appleseed reveals that workers feel intimidated and are apprehensive to report injuries and unsafe work conditions. This is scenario is compounded by the fact that undocumented workers, who have even less job security, work in jobs with higher risk. The Bush Administration did not make efforts to allow OSHA to heighten enforcement efforts. All of these ingredients combine to create a recipe that just doesn’t work.

The US Senate advanced the health care legislation to a floor debate in an unusual late Saturday night session. This action may indeed provide an opportunity for the stakeholders in workers’ compensation to all join in the debate and look for solutions to the delivery of appropriate medical care in an efficient and timely fashion. To avoid “unintended consequences” yet again, injured workers and their advocates will need to be active participants and engage in the debate now.

.......

To read more about workers’ compensation and universal health care solutions click here.

Asbestos Exposure Continues Needlessly

Despite all the knowledge of the hazards of asbestos fiber in the workplace, asbestos is still  mined throughout the world and continues to be used in the United States.  For decades asbestos has been recognized as the cause for asbestosis, lung cancer and mesothelioma. Asbestos is not banned in the US.

The US Geological Survey reports that asbestos production in 2008 (metric tons) continues at alarming rates around the world:
1. Russia.................1,017,000
2. China.....................238,000
3. Brazil.....................225,000
4. Kazakhstaan...........230,000
5. Canada...................180,000


The US continues to import 1,460 metric tons of asbestos at a raw product cost of $1,090,000. It exports and reports  many asbestos and asbestos based products including: cement products, friction products, gaskets, paper and millboard, all valued at $33,200,000.


"U.S. consumption of asbestos was 1,460 t in 2008, a 16% decrease from 1,730 t in 2007. Coating and compounds accounted for 36% of U.S. consumption; roofing products, 34%; and other, 30%. Most of the asbestos reported under “coating and compounds” probably was used in roofing products. Consequently, roofing applications, which comprised bituminous roof coatings and roof sealants, accounted for 65% to 70% of the total U.S. asbestos end-use market."

While U.S. imports and sales continues to decline, the legacy of asbestos disease lives on, continuing to generate unnecessary disease, suffering  and death. An efficient and expeditious compensation system for those workers who have been exposed and suffer disease has become increasing complicated and difficult to navigate. Another recent report indicates that the workers' compensation system continues to shift responsibility to the social security system as the path for benefits becomes more litigious and difficult to navigate. A good first step to solve the problem would be for Congress to ban asbestos entirely in the U.S.

......

To read more about asbestos and workers' compensation click here.

To read more about asbestos litigation click here.

Compensation Benefits for Smokers

On the eve of the annual Great American Smokeout one needs to reflect on the inadequacy of the national workers' compensation to assist in this effort. For decades, the addictive habit of smoking has been treated as a non-compensable cause and a pre-existing condition. See The Health Consequences of Smoking: Cancer and Chronic Lung Disease in the Workplace: A Report of the Surgeon General. 


Like obesity, workers' compensation insurance carriers have considered it as a risk not associated with work condition even though it has been a synergistic agent in many occupational cancers, ie. asbestos exposure and smoking results in an enormous risk increase for lung cancer. 


To make the workplace safer and end the epidemic of occupational cancers, the compensation system should embrace the effort to eliminate smoking in the workplace and provide assistance to workers to stop smoking.

Great American Smokeout ---

November 19, 2009

Although the United States has made great strides toward reducing the prevalence of smoking, approximately 46 million adults (20.6% of the population) still smoke (1), and every day, another 1,000 young persons become new smokers (2). Annually, smoking results in 440,000 deaths and $193 billion in health-care costs and lost productivity (3). November 19 marks the 33rd anniversary of the American Cancer Society's Great American Smokeout. This annual event challenges smokers to quit for at least 1 day and provides information resources to help them quit permanently.
Quitting smoking has immediate and long-term benefits, including reduced risk for heart disease and certain cancers. Successful quitting often takes several tries. To improve success, smokers should use proven cessation treatments and services, including health-care guidance, approved medications, and cessation counseling. Combining counseling and medications can more than double cessation success. More information about the Great American Smokeout is available at http://www.cancer.org, and free help for quitting smoking is available by calling 800-QUIT-NOW (800-784-8669) or visiting http://www.smokefree.gov.

References

1. CDC. Cigarette smoking among adults and trends in smoing cessation---United States, 2008. MMWR 2009;58:1227--32.
2. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results from the 2008 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: detailed tables, 4-10A and 4-11A. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Applied Studies; 2009. Available at http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/nsduh/2k8nsduh/tabs/sect4petabs1to16.htm#tab4.10a. Accessed November 4, 2009.
3. CDC. Smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and productivity losses---United States, 2000--2004. MMWR 2008;57:1226--8.

APHA Calls for US Asbestos Ban

The American Public Heath Association (APA) has called for a ban by Congress on the manufacture, sale, export, or import of asbestos containing products including products in which asbestos is a contaminant. Asbestos claims 10,000 American lives each year.

“As early as 1898, the British government factory inspectors recognized adverse health effects associated with exposure to asbestos fibers. By the 1930’s the scientific evidence was well established of the association between asbestos exposure and nonmalignant respiratory disease, and with the publication of Dr. Irving Selikoff’s study of insulation workers in 1964, the evidence of carcinogenicity was incontrovertible as well.”

“Despite the concerns of asbestos exporting countries and business interests of the mining industry, the scientific consensus today is that all types of asbestos fibers, including chrysotile, cause asbestosis, lung and other cancers, specifically mesothelioma. The magnitude of the public health problem presented by asbestos and its ubiquitous use during the last 50 years is revealed by death certificate data analyzed by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). NIOSH identified 2,485 deaths in the U.S. in 1999 in which malignant mesothelioma was listed as an underlying or contributing cause of death; and that during 1968--2005, asbestosis was identified as the underlying cause of death for 9,024 decedents, 13% of these were aged 25-64 years. These data undoubtedly underestimate the situation as asbestos-related disease can take 10 to 50 years to present. The estimated portion of lung cancer deaths attributed to asbestos exposure is 2-3 percent.”

During the 1950’s and 1960’s Dr Selikoff would testify in the NJ Division of Workers’ Compensation as a medical expert for injured workers. I had the privilege of knowing him and observing his efforts to assist injured workers and spread his scientific discoveries on the harmful effects of asbestos products.

It is shocking that in 2009 the US permits the use, manufacturing and distribution of asbestos containing products. It is certainly well passed the time to ban asbestos in the US.

To read more about asbestos and workers’ compensation click here.

To read more about asbestos litigation click here.

US EPA Targets Hazardous Chemicals for New Regulations

The Obama Administration has announced a proposed initiative to regulated hazardous substances. The workplace and the Workers' Compensation system has been literally plagued for decades with an epidemic of disease caused by the use of dangerous and unregulated chemicals in the workplace.

Lisa Jackson, US EPA Administrator, in a speech before the Commonwealth Club in San Francisco announced the Administrations proposed initiative to finally ban the use of asbestos. Asbestos, still permitted to be used in the US, is well known carcinogen that has been causally connected to asbestosis, lung cancer and mesothelioma (a fatal illness).

Citing the failure of the 1976 Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), Jackson has proposed new legislation that will require that manufactures to develop new data on safety of existing chemicals and new chemicals used. She stated:

"As with existing chemicals, the burden of proof falls on EPA. Manufacturers aren’t required to show that sufficient data exist to fully assess a chemical’s risks. If EPA has adequate data, and wants to protect the public against known risks, the law creates obstacles to quick and effective action.Since 1976, EPA has issued regulations to control only five existing chemicals determined to present an unreasonable risk. Five from a total universe of almost 80,000 existing chemicals. In 1989, after years of study, EPA issued rules phasing out most uses of asbestos, an exhaustively studied substance that has taken an enormous toll on the health of Americans. Yet, a court overturned EPA’s rules because it had failed to clear the many hurdles for action under TSCA.

"Today, advances in toxicology and analytical chemistry are revealing new pathways of exposure. There are subtle and troubling effects of chemicals on hormone systems, human reproduction, intellectual development and cognition. Every few weeks, we read about new potential threats: Bisphenol A, or BPA – a chemical that can affect brain development and has been linked to obesity and cancer – is in baby bottles; phthalate esters – which have been said to affect reproductive development – are in our medical devices; we see lead in toys; dioxins in fish; and the list goes on. Many states – including California – have stepped in to address these threats because they see inaction at the national level.

"Senator Lautenberg, Chairman Waxman, Senator Boxer, Congressman Rush and others in Congress have already recognized that TSCA must be updated and strengthened. EPA needs the tools to do the job the public expects. And we are working together with President Obama on this issue.

The Administration's 6 part initiative will include the following according to Jackson:

"First, we need to review all chemicals against safety standards that are based solely on considerations of risk – not economics or other factors – and we must set these standards at levels that are protective of human health and the environment.

"Second, safety standards cannot be applied without adequate information, and responsibility for providing that information should rest on industry. Manufacturers must develop and submit the hazard, use, and exposure data demonstrating that new and existing chemicals are safe. If industry doesn’t provide the information, EPA should have the tools to quickly and efficiently require testing, without the delays and procedural obstacles currently in place.

"Third, both EPA and industry must include special consideration for exposures and effects on groups with higher vulnerabilities – particularly children. Children ingest chemicals at a higher ratio to their body weight than adults, and are more susceptible to long-term damage and developmental problems. Our new principles offer them much stronger protections.

"Fourth, when chemicals fall short of the safety standard, EPA must have clear authority to take action. We need flexibility to consider a range of factors – but must also have the ability to move quickly. In all cases, EPA and chemical producers must act on priority chemicals in a timely manner, with firm deadlines to maintain accountability. This will not only assure prompt protection of health and the environment, but provide business with the certainly that it needs for planning and investment.

"Fifth, we must encourage innovation in green chemistry, and support research, education, recognition, and other strategies that will lead us down the road to safer and more sustainable chemicals and processes. All of this must happen with the utmost transparency and concern for the public’s right to know.

"Finally, we need to make sure that EPA’s safety assessments are properly resourced, with industry contributing its fair share of the costs of implementing new requirements.

For more information concerning "occupational illnesses" and workers' compensation click here.

Risk Assessments for Asbestos Present Difficulties

For decades asbestos has been known human carcinogen and major health hazard causally related to asbestosis, lung cancer and mesothelioma. It is still not banned in the United States. Recent efforts to provide statistics assessments of the hazard haven’t proven to be unsuccessful.

A study published in the September 2009 issue of The American Journal of Industrial Medicine concludes, “None of the efforts to use statistical models to characterize relative cancer potencies for asbestos fiber types and sizes have been able to overcome limitations of the exposure data. Resulting uncertainties have been so great that these estimates should not be used to drive occupational and environmental health policy. The EPA has now rejected and discontinued work on its proposed methods for estimating potency factors. Future efforts will require new methods and more precise and reliable exposure assessments. However, while there may be genuine need for such work, a more pressing priority with regard to the six regulated forms of asbestos and other asbestiform fibers is to ban their production and use.”

NIH Defense Asbestos Expert Pleads Guilty to Lying

A physician who was working full time in a senior position with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) pleaded guilty to lying about moonlighting as an expert in litigation at $425.00 per hour. Dr. Jack Snyder pleaded guilty recently and was convicted of a felony.

US EPA Cites Vermont Companies for Asbestos Removal

A Vermont company was cited by the US EPA for failing to test for asbestos. The company had been demolishing a building and failed to first test for the presence of asbestos fiber. The companies involved could face a penalty of nearly $30,000 for alleged violations of the Clean Air Act and the National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Asbestos.

"The federal Clean Air Act and the National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Asbestos (Asbestos NESHAP) require owners and operators of demolition and renovation operations to follow certain inspection and notification requirements prior to beginning such operations, and to abide by specific work practice and waste disposal requirements when the owners and operators identify the presence of regulated asbestos-containing material."

Ingestion and inhalation of asbestos fibers is a known cause of lung cancer, asbestosis and mesothelioma.

-------------

For further reference on asbestsos exposure visit the Workers' Compensation Blog.

Asbestos Exposure Results in $200,000 Award for Future Medical Monitoring

The NJ Appellate Division recently affirmed a jury award for $200,000. for medical monitoring. The injured worker was exposed to asbestos fiber at worked as a millwright for a paper mill during the years 1956 through 1994 and a Johns Manville for approximately 6 months in 1955. He was diagnosed as having "pleural plaques" on his lungs.

The Court, relying on other judicial precedent, held that the award of damages for future medical medical monitoring was "'consistent with well-accepted legal principles'" and "'the important public health interest in fostering access to medical testing for individuals whose exposure to toxic chemicals creates an enhanced risk of disease.'"

Since asbestos related disease is progressive and has a long latency period from the initial exposure to the onset of disease (asbestos, cancer & mesothelioma) it is warranted that medical monitoring through doctor's visits are warranted.

Sarkozy v A.P. Green, et al., NJ Super A-0312-07T1 (App Div) Decided July 31, 2009.

Asbestos Production Slows As The Economy Lags

The sluggish economy is deemed to be the cause of lower asbestos production. Foster Wheeler Ltd., a producer of asbestos, has reported that it's second-earnings profit has dropped 24% based on lower sales of asbestos and lower demand for engineering and construction projects.

Asbestos, a known carcinogen, has yet to be banned from production in the United States. For decades it has been mined and used in products including insulation, floor tile, construction products and gaskets. It has been recognized as the sole cause for mesotheloma, a rare, but fatal, cancer. Asbestos exposure a significant risk factor in lung, gastrointestinal and other malignancies.

Since the latency period of asbestos related disease is 10 to 15 or more years after exposure, the drop in asbestos production may signal that asbestos related disease will also decline in future decades. In most jurisdictions, workers' compensation systems, have struggled to provided benefits to workers who have been exposed to asbestos fiber even though the onset of the occupational disease did not manifest for decades following exposure to the natural occurring fiber.

For many years advocacy groups have fought for a complete ban on the use of asbestos products in the United States. Legislation is currently remains pending in Congress.

ADAO honors asbestos victim and nurse for 2010 Asbestos Awareness Day

The Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization (ADAO) announced that June Breit, a pleural mesothelioma victim since 2002, is its 2010 ADAO Alan Reinstein Memorial Award Honoree. Since her diagnoses, Breit has been a major player in political and educational advocacy related to public health.
The ADAO also announced that its 6th Annual Asbestos Disease Awareness Conference will be held April 9-10, 2010 in Chicago, IL. The purpose of this conference is to provide the latest occupational, medical and environmental information about asbestos-related illness. Registration and sponsorship opportunities will be announced in September 2009.

Read more about asbestos and asbestos-related diseases.

Asbestos Do-It-Yourself Test Kit Avaiable

Asbestos is a know carcinogen. It is present at work sites, schools and in homes. It was frequently used, and in fact required, on various construction sites before 1980. Some examples include popcorn ceilings, insulation material and floor tile.

A $29.95 kit is now being marketed to test for asbestos fiber. The kit is being sold through many hardware stores including Home Depot and Lowes.

The CDC has not yet banned asbestos use is not yet banned in the United States and continues reduce potential years of life.

EPA Warns of Asbestos Exposures From Attic Insulation

Asbestos exposures in attics has become a major area of concern of the US EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). Loose vermiculite was commonly used in attics to insulate home. Asbestos is a known carcinogen.

Recently the US EPA declared asbestos in Libby Montana as a public health emergency. EPA is launching a public awareness campaign to notify the public, including individuals whose jobs routinely put them in attic spaces, about the potential for vermiculite insulation to be contaminated with asbestos fibers. A new EPA guidance document, targeted for the general public, is available athttp://www.epa.gov/asbestos/pubs/verm.html.

Additional information concerning asbestos exposures and asbestos claims is avialable at: http://www.gelmans.com

Owner of Asbestos Mine Agrees to Address Contamination

The U.S. Department of Justice announced that as part of a multi-site settlement, G-I Holdings Inc. has agreed to address asbestos contamination caused by its past operation of the largest chrysotile asbestos mine and mill in the country.

The 1,673-acre abandoned mine site in Vermont, known as the Vermont Asbestos Group Mine Site (VAG Site) is the most significant of the contaminated sites covered by the settlement, which includes 12 other industrial sites across the country where G-I may have disposed of hazardous waste.

"The cornerstone of this settlement is that G-I is responsible for completing extensive work at the Vermont Asbestos Group Mine Site, focusing on site security, air monitoring and investigating and sampling certain mine tailings," said John C. Cruden, Acting Assistant Attorney General for the Justice Department's Environment and Natural Resources Division. "G-I will also pay for its share of cleanup costs for this Site and nine other contaminated sites around the country."

The consent decree was filed in the U.S Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey and is subject to a 30 day public comment period and approval of the Federal Court. A copy of the consent decree is available on the Department of Justice Web site at http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_Decrees.html.

Claims for asbestos related disease have played a significant roll in the national workers' compensation system. Additional information concerning asbestos exposure is available on our website: http://www.gelmans.com/

Mesothelioma Compensation Rate 32% in Canada

When combined with a history of occupational asbestos exposure, mesothelioma is often presumed work-related.

In Canada, workers diagnosed with mesothelioma caused by occupational asbestos exposure are often eligible for compensation under provincial workers' compensation boards. Although occupational asbestos exposure causes the majority of mesothelioma, Canadian research suggests less than half of workers actually apply for compensation.

Alberta's mandatory reporting requirements may produce higher filing rates but this is currently unknown. This study evaluates Alberta's mesothelioma filing and compensation rates.

METHODS: Demographic information on all mesothelioma patients diagnosed between 1980 and 2004 were extracted from the Alberta Cancer Board's Cancer Registry and linked to Workers' Compensation Board of Alberta claims data.

RESULTS: Alberta recorded a total of 568 histologically confirmed mesothelioma cases between 1980 and 2004. Forty-two percent of cases filed a claim; 83% of filed claims were accepted for compensation.

CONCLUSIONS: Patient under-reporting of compensable mesothelioma is a problem and raises larger questions regarding under-reporting of other asbestos-related cancers in Alberta. Strategies should focus on increasing filing rates where appropriate.

Cree MW, Lalji M, Jiang B, Carriere KC. Am J Ind Med. 2009 Jul;52(7):526-33. PMID: 19484745 [PubMed - in process]

US Supreme Court Bars Direct Asbestos Claims Against Travelers Insurance

The US Supreme Court ruled that the direct action claims against Travelers Insurance Company for its conduct in the asbestos conspiracy with Johns-Manville Corporation (Manville) were barred by the 1986 reorganization plan of the Manville.

"As part of the 1986 reorganization plan of the Johns-Manville Corporation (Manville), an asbestos supplier and manufacturer of asbestos containing products, the Bankruptcy Court approved a settlement providing that Manville’s insurers, including The Travelers Indemnity Company and related companies (Travelers), would contribute to the corpus of the Manville Personal Injury Settlement Trust (Trust), and releasing those insurers from any “Policy Claims,” which were channeled to the Trust. “Policy Claims” include, as relevant here, “claims” and “allegations” against the insurers “based upon, arising out of or relating to” the Manville insurance policies. 

"The settlement agreement and reorganization plan were approved by the Bankruptcy Court (1986 Orders) and were affirmed by the District Court and the Second Circuit. Over a decade later plaintiffs began filing asbestos actions against Travelers in state courts (Direct Actions), often seeking to recover from Travelers not for Manville’s wrongdoing but for Travelers’ own alleged violations of state consumer-protection statutes or of common law duties. Invoking the 1986 Orders, Travelers asked the Bankruptcy Court to enjoin 26 Direct Actions. Ultimately,a settlement was reached, in which Travelers agreed to make payments to compensate the Direct Action claimants, contingent on the court’s order clarifying that the Direct Actions were, and remained, prohibited by the 1986 Orders. 

"The court made extensive factual findings, uncontested here, concluding that Travelers derived its knowledge of asbestos from its insurance relationship with Manville and that the Direct Actions are based on acts or omissions by Travelers arising from or related to the insurance policies. It then approved the settlement and entered an order (Clarifying Order), which provided that the 1986 Orders barred the pending Direct Actions and various other claims. Objectors to the settlement (respondents here) appealed. The District Court affirmed, but the Second Circuit reversed. 

"Agreeing that the Bankruptcy Court had jurisdiction to interpret and enforce the 1986 Orders, the Circuit nevertheless held that the Bankruptcy Court lacked jurisdiction to enjoin the Direct Actions because those actions sought not to recover based on Manville’s conduct, but to recover directly from Travelers for its own.

EPA Declares Asbestos in Libby Montana is a Public Health Emergency

An historic first occurred today with the announcement by the US EPA that the asbestos in Libby, Montana constituted a Public Health Emergency. The EPA stated, "Over the past years, hundreds of asbestos-related disease cases have been documented in this small community, which covers the towns of Libby and Troy. "

"This is the first time EPA has made a determination under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) that conditions at a site constitute a public health emergency. This determination recognizes the serious impact to the public health from the contamination at Libby and underscores the need for further action and health care for area residents who have been or may be exposed to asbestos. Investigations performed by the Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease Registry have found the incidence of occurrence of asbestosis, a lung condition, in the Libby area staggeringly higher than the national average for the period from 1979-1998. EPA is working closely with the Department of Health and Human Services, which is making available a short-term grant to provide needed asbestos-related medical care to Libby and Troy residents. "

Automatic Stay Invoked in Chrysler Bankrutcy in MDL Action

On April 30, 2009 Chrysler LLC and certain domestic subsidiaries filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy in the US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of NY under chapter 11 of title 11 of the USC. An automatic stay imposed under section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code has been invoked. A suggestion of Bankruptcy has been filed in MDL No, 875 (asbestos).