The New Economic Recovery Act Fails to Include Workers' Compensation Privacy Needs

The new stimulus package, The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act [ARRA], fails to protect medical record privacy for injured workers. The new economic recovery package includes an appropriation of $19 Billion for the expansion of electronic health records [EHR] by funding intellectual technology. The legislation fails to include an essential prohibition on the dissemination and misuse of workers' compensation medical records.

The spokesperson for the Center for Healthcare Transformation and the Gingrich Group, stated that, "Privacy cannot be compromised, but neither can we compromise progress in pulling our health care system out of the technological Stone Age," ... "We need to find the right balance between privacy at all costs and progress at any cost."

The legislation should be expanded to protect the privacy of workers’ compensation medical records from misuse use. A coalition of legislators, including Rep. Edward J. Markey, Massachusetts Democrat, expressed deep concerns. Markey stated, "Medical information is probably the most sensitive and personal information that we have about ourselves. Without strong privacy safeguards, a health [information-technology] database will become an open invitation for identity thieves, fraudsters, extortionists or marketers looking to cash in on our medical histories." He further remarked that, "tough privacy safeguards" are necessary to reap the benefits of integrated health databases.

While the EHR is a noble project to increase overall efficiency and economy, the misuse of the data of injured workers remains a deep concern. The open door to this information left by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act [HIPA] and ignored by ARRA must be addressed so that the medical records of our working wounded do not become a gold mine for unscrupulous exploitation..

Paying for Medical Performance in Workers' Compensation Claims

The workers' compensation medical delivery system is a target of much controversy over its effectiveness. The extensive delays in the delivery of medical benefits because of bureaucratic stagnation, and the massive employee dissatisfaction over the results of industry managed care are a rising chorus of concern.

The Federal government, in an emerging concept, is now looking toward limiting escalation costs and other medical issues, by utilizing a concept that provides reimbursement to medical providers based on outcome success. The system will no longer pay for medical failures or mismanagement. The traditional fee-for-services approach is slowly giving way to newer and innovated approaches for medical provider reimbursement.

Whether the compensation system is either closed panel (employer choice of physician) or open panel (employee choice of physician) the ultimate outcome would determine the level of medical reimbursement. In a nation where there is a premium placed upon getting skilled and talented employees back to work in a full capacity, this concept is gaining popularity.

Paying for medical performance in Workers' Compensation might be just what the doctor ironically ordered so that the disabled population receives appropriate and timely care that so justly deserve.

Privacy Went Out the Window

Privacy, a core element in the workers’ compensation system, is rapidly become a thing of the past. Both the State and Federal governments have not considered it a key ingredient in the program.

States, in their to conversion to electronic claims record keeping, have eliminated privacy. The State of California electronically released workers’ compensation claim data concerning Nadya Suleman, the mother who gave birth to eight babies last week. This was after months of complaints by claimants and attorneys that the California electronic claims system was flawed.

Likewise the Federal law, HIPPA [The Health Care Personal Information Non-Disclosure Act of 1998] governing medical records specifically excludes workers’ compensation medical information. Final Health Insurance Privacy Regulations that were published by the Department of Health and Human Services on December 28, 2000, establishing standards for privacy of individually identifiable health information records eliminate privacy in compensation claims. While the regulations cover health plans, health care clearinghouses and certain other providers who use computers to transmit claims information, workers' compensation insurance carriers are exempted.

The Institute of Medicine (IOM) committee has recently recommended the Congress and health agencies develop a new approach to protecting privacy in health research. In a 316 page report released by their Committee on Health Research and the Privacy of Health Information it concluded that HIPPA does not protect privacy.

As the country embarks on a new economic recovery program, including national health care, the Federal government must rebuild the national system of workers’ compensation system. Privacy should not be thrown out the windows when administering a workers' compensation benefit delivery system.

Perspectives on Asbestos Litigation - Symposium Published

What has been described as the longest mass tort in the history of litigation, which had its geniuses in workers' compensation, continues to be a judicial learning experience. The Southwestern University Law Review has recently published a issue in conjunction with the symposium on asbestos litigation. Judges, lawyers and professors who participated in this unique seminar reflected upon the lessons learned and the issues that developed in its long course in the civil justice system.

CMS May Participate in Conferences to Discuss Mandatory Reporting

CMS has announced that it will consider participating in conferences to address mandatory reporting requirements and their implementation. It is accepting email requests at
PL110-173sec111-comments@cms.hhs.gov

The requests must include the following information:

-Conference Name/Title.
-Contact Person for the CMS Participation Request: Name/address/telephone/email.
-Sponsoring Organization: Name/address/telephone/email.
-Date(s) and Time(s) of Conference.
-Location of Conference: City/State.
-Approximate Number of Conference Attendees.
-Conference Topics: Please attach a draft agenda for the conference if available.
-Target Audience for the conference: Please be as specific as possible (for example, plaintiff attorneys, defense attorneys, insurers, third party administrators, risk managers, etc.).
-Scope of CMS participation requested: CMS needs to know whether audience interest is expected to be directed at Group Health Plan (GHP) related reporting issues as well as Liability -Insurance (including Self-Insurance), No-Fault Insurance, and Workers’ Compensation reporting issues or is expected to be more focused on some subset such as Workers’ Compensation reporting issues.
-Is the event open to the public?

CMS plans to respond within two weeks of the submitted request.

Taxing Workers' Compensation Benefits to Finance the Bailout

As the greatest economic bailout goes forward, the Federal and State governments are exploring new areas to raise revenue, including from workers’ compensation benefits. The multi-billion dollar national workers’ compensation system, insured by recently nationalized unstable insurance carriers, maybe be a source to fund the rapidly increasing national debt.

The US national debt already amounts to almost $10 Trillion. The population of the US is 305.603, 863 and each citizen's share of the debt equals $35,091.43.

The economies of the Federal and State governments are crashing. California has now enacted furlough days to reduce its payroll. Delays in the delivery of workers’ compensation benefits will be compounded and insurance companies will be able to hold onto the benefits longer.

Benefit programs have increasingly become a source of revenue for the government. The Social Security Administration has enacted a user fee.

Other Federal programs charge for issuing opinions and rulings. The IRS has such a program for private rulings. CMS maybe required to impose a fee for the review and analysis of CMS MCSAA (Medicare Compensation Set Aside Agreements). The IRS already taxes punitive and non-economic awards.

As the demand for funding increases, Workers’ Compensation benefits may become a source of additional governmental revenue, especially in light of the need to monitor insurance funds and expedite the delivery of benefits. These new developments give added urgency to a complete review of the entire workers' compensation system.

Commissioning The Federal Government for a New Workers' Compensation System

Legislation was recently introduced in Congress to re-establish a National Commission on State Workers’ Compensation Laws [Commission]. This attempt to recreate the almost 4 decades ago effort to evaluate uniformity of benefits, was introduced by a sole legislator, Representative Joe Baca [CA-43] and lacks any co-sponsorship or a duplicate effort in the US Senate.

The initial Commission I, 1972 Report of the National Commission on State Workmen's Compensation Laws, chaired by Professor Emeritus John Burton, looked the national patchwork of chaotic programs to provide uniformity of benefit delivery in the program almost 4 decades ago.

The 1972 report concluded: “We have concluded that there is a significant role for a modern workmen's compensation program and that the States' primary responsibility for the program should be conserved. We also agree that the protection furnished by workmen's compensation to American workers presently is, in general, inadequate and inequitable. Significant improvements in workmen's compensation are necessary if the program is to fulfill its potential.”

The bottom line is that the national system is a hodgepodge of state workers’ compensation laws that are not at all functional in today’s economic/medical market. The times changed since the original enactment of multiple state enactments in 1911. The present program has indeed out lived its usefulness. Over the decades many stakeholders have become preoccupied with economic considerations that have far seriously degraded human considerations.

A national review at the Federal level is a welcome sign that The Administration is using a thoughtful approach to change. This path must embrace the workers’ compensation medical delivery system into universal health care.