Copyright

(c) 2010-2026 Jon L Gelman, All Rights Reserved.

Thursday, January 29, 2026

Chemical Glove Selection is Critical

How Proper Hand Protection Impacts Workers' Compensation Benefits



In today's automated manufacturing environment, chemical hand injuries continue to drive significant workers' compensation costs—averaging $26,300 per claim according to the National Safety Council. While robotics and automated processes have reduced direct chemical handling, the risk hasn't disappeared. In fact, reduced vigilance around proper hand protection has created a dangerous gap in workplace safety.

The Hidden Cost of Inadequate Protection

Hand injuries represent 23% of all workplace injuries in the United States, with chemical exposure accounting for a substantial portion. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, approximately 240,000 hand injuries occur annually that result in at least one missed workday. When chemical exposure is involved, settlements can range from $12,000 to over $200,000, depending on severity.

The financial impact extends beyond the immediate settlement. Chemical burns and exposure-related injuries often result in:

  • Extended medical treatment requiring specialized care
  • Permanent disability ratings affecting future earning capacity
  • Temporary total disability benefits for extended recovery periods
  • Potential third-party liability claims against equipment manufacturers
  • Long-term complications that may not manifest for years

Why Workers' Comp Claims Get Denied

Inadequate hand protection is a primary reason chemical-exposure claims face challenges. Insurance carriers scrutinize whether:

  1. Proper PPE was provided and used - Employers must document that appropriate chemical-resistant gloves were available and employees were trained on their use
  2. Glove selection matched the hazard - No single glove protects against all chemicals; improper selection can result in claim denials
  3. Exposure was work-related - Proving causation becomes critical, especially for chronic exposure injuries
  4. Safety protocols were followed - Failure to follow established procedures can complicate claims

The Science of Chemical Glove Selection

Chemical-resistant gloves are manufactured from various materials, each with specific protective properties:

  • Nitrile: Excellent resistance to oils, solvents, and petroleum-based chemicals
  • Neoprene: Protects against acids, bases, alcohols, and peroxides
  • Butyl: Superior protection against highly corrosive acids and ketones
  • PVC: Effective for acids, bases, oils, and animal fats
  • Viton: Handles aromatic and chlorinated solvents

Critical fact: Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) specify required glove types for each chemical. Using the wrong glove material can allow chemicals to permeate through "protective" equipment without visible signs of failure, creating a false sense of security.

OSHA Requirements and Employer Responsibilities

Under 29 CFR 1915.152(a), employers must provide appropriate gloves and protective clothing to protect workers from:

  • Skin absorption of harmful substances
  • Chemical burns
  • Cuts, lacerations, and punctures
  • Thermal burns
  • Harmful temperature extremes

Employers must:

  • Conduct hazard assessments to identify chemical exposures
  • Select appropriate PPE based on manufacturer specifications
  • Train workers on proper use, limitations, and maintenance
  • Document PPE selection and training
  • Replace compromised equipment immediately

Building a Strong Workers' Compensation Claim

If you suffer a chemical hand injury, take these steps to protect your claim:

Immediate Actions:

    1. Seek medical attention immediately and inform the physician that the injury is work-related
    2. Report the injury to your employer within the required timeframes (varies by state)
    3. Document the chemical involved, the glove type used, and the circumstances
    4. Photograph injuries and contaminated gloves if possible

Documentation Requirements:

    • Medical records linking the chemical to your injury
    • MSDS sheets for the chemicals involved
    • Witness statements from coworkers
    • Records of PPE provided and training received
    • Evidence of employer knowledge of hazard

Legal Considerations:

    • Workers' comp claims don't require proving employer negligence
    • Third-party claims may exist against glove manufacturers or chemical suppliers
    • Chronic exposure claims require expert medical testimony
    • Delayed onset injuries have specific reporting requirements

Recent Trends Impacting Claims

2024-2025 Developments:

  1. Increased scrutiny on PPE selection - Insurance carriers now regularly audit employer glove selection protocols
  2. Expert witness requirements - Complex chemical exposure claims increasingly require toxicologists and occupational medicine specialists
  3. Lifetime medical considerations - Some chemical injuries require ongoing monitoring, affecting settlement valuations
  4. Mental health components - Severe chemical burns can result in PTSD and anxiety, adding psychological damages

Prevention Strategies That Support Claims

Creating a documented safety culture strengthens both injury prevention and claim viability:

  • Implement written chemical safety programs
  • Maintain glove selection charts based on OSHA guidance
  • Conduct regular PPE inspections and replacements
  • Document all safety training with sign-off sheets
  • Encourage immediate reporting of glove failures or exposure incidents
  • Keep detailed chemical inventory and exposure records

Key Takeaways

For Workers:

    • Proper glove selection is not optional—it's your first line of defense
    • Improper PPE can void your protection and complicate your claim
    • Document everything from day one of an injury
    • Seek experienced workers' compensation counsel early

For Employers:

    • Investment in proper PPE reduces claim costs significantly
    • Documentation of safety programs is critical to defense
    • Regular audits of glove selection prevent costly mistakes
    • Training records can make or break a claim dispute

Resources and References


*Jon L. Gelman of Wayne, NJ, is the author of NJ Workers' Compensation Law (West-Thomson-Reuters) and co-author of the national treatise Modern Workers' Compensation Law (West-Thomson-Reuters).


Blog: Workers' Compensation

LinkedIn: JonGelman

LinkedIn Group: Injured Workers Law & Advocacy Group

Author: "Workers' Compensation Law" West-Thomson-Reuters

Mastodon:@gelman@mstdn.social

Blue Sky: jongelman@bsky.social

Substack: https://jongelman.substack.com/


© 2026 Jon L Gelman. All rights reserved.


Attorney Advertising

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.


Disclaimer





No comments: