How Proper Hand Protection Impacts Workers' Compensation Benefits
Copyright
(c) 2010-2026 Jon L Gelman, All Rights Reserved.
Showing posts with label Personal protective equipment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Personal protective equipment. Show all posts
Thursday, January 29, 2026
Wednesday, January 29, 2014
Supreme Court Rules for Employers in Two Cases
The Supreme Court Monday gave airlines a wide berth to report potential security threats, dismissing a pilot’s lawsuit alleging his employer defamed him by telling the Transportation Security Administration he could be armed and mentally unstable.
Separately, the court rejected a claim by steelworkers from Gary, Ind., that they were entitled to pay for time spent putting on safety gear, finding that the task qualified as “changing clothes,” for which their union contract didn’t require compensation.
Finally, Monday, the court sided with a convicted heroin dealer to rule that he couldn’t be punished for the death of one of his customers because of evidence that the man’s health was so poor he might have died even without the narcotic.
All three decisions were unanimous or nearly so, underscoring that despite gulfs in the most charged disputes, justices of different ideological backgrounds agree on a significant number of legal issues. Read the full story here.
[Click here to see the original post]
Related articles
- Supreme Court Rules for Employers in Two Cases (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Airlines aren't liable for exaggerating possible air emergencies (fromthetrenchesworldreport.com)
Friday, December 13, 2013
Chain Saw Safety
![]()
OSHA Quick Card
Chain Saw Safety Operating a chain saw is inherently hazardous. Potential injuries can be minimized by using proper personal protective equipment and safe operating procedures.
Before Starting a Chain Saw
|
Related articles
Black Friday: OSHA Issues Safety Warning to Employers
How Safe Is Healthcare for Workers?
OSHA proposes more than $460,000 in fines against Long Island, NY, contractor for repeat fall and scaffolding hazards
OSHA fines Ronkonkoma contractor $460G for more safety violations
OSHA announces proposed new rule to improve tracking of workplace injuries and illnesses
Carbon Monoxide Safety Facts and Tips - How to prevent poisoning from a gas with no odor
Monday, January 9, 2012
Hostess Fined $105,000
OSHA's inspection found an absence of guardrails to prevent workers from falling into and through hoppers; a locked emergency exit door and an exit route blocked by product racks; unguarded moving machine parts on a conveyor belt, band saw blade, drill press and other equipment; undocumented procedures to prevent the unintended activation of machinery during maintenance; and individuals working on live electrical equipment who were not familiar with the protective equipment needed for such work. These serious violations resulted in citations carrying $42,200 in fines. A serious violation occurs when there is substantial probability that death or serious physical harm could result from a hazard about which the employer knew or should have known.
The recurring violations involve failing to guard chains and sprockets on a cake alignment conveyor and a packaging machine feeder, and provide personal protective equipment to safeguard employees against electrical shocks, arc flashes and arc blasts while working with live electrical parts. The citations carry $62,500 in fines. A repeat violation exists when an employer previously has been cited for the same or a similar violation of a standard, regulation, rule or order at any other facility in federal enforcement states within the last five years. OSHA cited International Brands in 2010 for similar hazards at plants in Columbus, Ga., and Schiller Park, Ill.
The citations can be viewed at http://www.osha.gov/ooc/citations/InterstateBrands_315672352_1222_11.pdf.*
.....
For over 3 decades the Law Offices of Jon L. Gelman 1.973.696.7900 jon@gelmans.com have been representing injured workers and their families who have suffered occupational accidents and illnesses.
Related articles
- OSHA Cites Manufacturers and Distributors of Formaldehyde Hair Products (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- OSHA fines Paterson, NJ, company $126,000 for failing to guard machines and exposing workers to fall and electrical hazards (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- OSHA cites Creamer Sanzari Joint Venture for safety hazards at Passaic River bridge project in Clifton, NJ (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Chicago Contractors Fines $280,000 For Asbestos Violations (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Employer Co-Op Pays OSHA Fines after 26 Industry Employee Deaths (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- US Department of Labor continues to cite beauty salons and manufacturers for formaldehyde exposure from hair smoothing produc (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Twinkies maker Hostess seeks bankruptcy protection
Thursday, January 6, 2011
EPA Urged to Shut Down Dangerous Asbestos Removal Method
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Inspector General has just signed an "Early Warning Report" that will shut down a dangerous and unapproved asbestos removal method that two EPA offices have been testing for the past seven years.
The report supports what Public Justice has been arguing -- that the method both endangers public health and doesn't work.
The approved method requires all asbestos to be removed from a building by trained specialists wearing protective gear before it is demolished. Under the unapproved method, called the "Alternative Asbestos Control Method," or AACM, most of the asbestos-containing materials are left in place during demolition. Water with added surfactants is sprayed on the building to try to suppress asbestos release and contamination.
Read more about the EPA Asbestos Report:
The report supports what Public Justice has been arguing -- that the method both endangers public health and doesn't work.
The approved method requires all asbestos to be removed from a building by trained specialists wearing protective gear before it is demolished. Under the unapproved method, called the "Alternative Asbestos Control Method," or AACM, most of the asbestos-containing materials are left in place during demolition. Water with added surfactants is sprayed on the building to try to suppress asbestos release and contamination.
Read more about the EPA Asbestos Report:
- Fact summary of AACM by Public Justice's Jim Hecker
- EPA's Early Warning Report
- EPA's Health & Safety Reviews
- Teichman Memo
- AACM2 Photos
- AACM2 Report
- AACM2 Work
- AACM3 Report
.....
For over 3 decades the Law Offices of Jon L. Gelman 1.973.696.7900 jon@gelmans.com have been representing injured workers and their families who have suffered occupational accidents and illnesses.
Related articles
- The Toxic Legacy of Raybestos-Manhattan Continues (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- WHO Urges Worldwide Asbestos Ban: Mesothelioma Rates Surge (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Home Renovation Cited As An Increased Risk for Mesothelioma (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Dr. Yasunosuke Suzuki, A Pioneer of Mesothelioma Medical Research (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- $2 Million Verdict to Plastic Compounder Suffering Mesothelioma - Call For Asbestos Ban (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)



