Copyright
(c) 2010-2026 Jon L Gelman, All Rights Reserved.
Showing posts with label Plaintiff. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Plaintiff. Show all posts
Thursday, January 30, 2014
Uncertainty Over Whether N.F.L. Settlement’s Money Will Last
As intriguing football matchups go, Sunday’s Super Bowl has nothing on one looming down the turnpike in federal court in Philadelphia — with Judge Anita B. Brody the ultimate referee.
Saturday, December 28, 2013
N.Y. Workers’ Comp Board to Transition Established UEF Claims Management to Triad Group
The New York State Workers’ Compensation Board recently announced it will transition the management of established Uninsured Employers’ Fund (UEF) claims to the Triad Group, LLC effective Jan. 13, 2014.
Triad Group, based in Troy, N.Y., is a professional service organization providing comprehensive claims management. These claims consist of established claims where liability has been determined, and medical, and/or indemnity payments must be made. Triad will perform all claim-related functions and legal representation. Claimants who have such UEF claims, and all parties of interest, including health care providers and legal representatives, will receive individual written notice of the change in claim administrator. The Workers’ Compensation Board said the transition of claim management should have no impact on claimants receiving workers’ comp benefits. Claimants who are receiving biweekly indemnity benefits will continue receiving benefits on the same schedule currently in place. For medical and transportation reimbursement requests after Jan. 13, 2014, Form C-257, Claimant’s Record of Medical and Travel Expenses and Request for Reimbursement, must be sent to Triad for processing with a copy to the Workers’ Compensation Board. For medical services provided on or after Jan. 13, 2014, in established cases only, health care providers should send new medical reports, bills and authorization requests to Triad, and a copy to the... [Click here to see the rest of this post] |
Related articles
- NJ COLA Bill Passed by Senate (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- The Next Wave: N.H.L. Players Sue League Over Head Injuries (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Work Comp Lost Focus (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- How Corporate Money Poisons "Independent" Medical Evaluations (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- A California Lesson: How to Kill Workers' Compensation Pill By Pill (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Hip Replacement Lawsuit: ASR Settlement ($2.5 Billion) Benefits Announced (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
Saturday, November 30, 2013
Hip Replacement Lawsuit: ASR Settlement ($2.5 Billion) Benefits Announced
The settlement terms of the ASR HIp Implant lawsuit have been announced:
The ASR Settlement provides for three basic areas of compensation.
The first is a Base Payment to all ASR Claimants (XL and resurfacing) who have undergone a revision surgery, removing the
acetabular cup, prior to August 31, 2013.
The second is for Claimants who have undergone a revision surgery in both their left and right hips (Bilateral Claimants).
The third addresses patients who have suffered a variety of medical complications following a revision surgery (Extraordinary Injury Fund).
In addition, the Settlement provides for the resolution of healthcare insurance liens for
medical costs that are directly associated with the revision surgery, at no additional cost to the
claimant.
Click here to read the complete press release issued by the Settlement Oversight Committee
Click here to read about the lawsuit.
The ASR Settlement provides for three basic areas of compensation.
The first is a Base Payment to all ASR Claimants (XL and resurfacing) who have undergone a revision surgery, removing the
acetabular cup, prior to August 31, 2013.
The second is for Claimants who have undergone a revision surgery in both their left and right hips (Bilateral Claimants).
The third addresses patients who have suffered a variety of medical complications following a revision surgery (Extraordinary Injury Fund).
In addition, the Settlement provides for the resolution of healthcare insurance liens for
medical costs that are directly associated with the revision surgery, at no additional cost to the
claimant.
Click here to read the complete press release issued by the Settlement Oversight Committee
Click here to read about the lawsuit.
….
Jon L. Gelman of Wayne NJ is the author NJ Workers’ Compensation Law (West-Thompson) and co-author of the national treatise, Modern Workers’ Compensation Law (West-Thompson). For over 4 decades the Law Offices of Jon L Gelman 1.973.696.7900 jon@gelmans.com have been representing injured workers and their families who have suffered occupational accidents and illnesses.
Related articles
- Johnson & Johnson agrees to pay $2.5 billion to resolve thousands of hip replacement lawsuits (canadianbusiness.com)
- Report: Johnson & Johnson could settle hip replacement lawsuits for $4 billion (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Parsippany NJ settles $54,000 workers' comp dispute with ex-construction official (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Florida Upholds Low Counsel Fees (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Johnson & Johnson hip implant settlement price could soar above $4 billion (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- The Next Wave: N.H.L. Players Sue League Over Head Injuries (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Johnson & Johnson to Pay More Than $2.2 Billion to Resolve Criminal and Civil Investigatio (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Changes to the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule for Calendar Year 2014 (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
Saturday, October 9, 2010
RICO Case Dismissed By Trial Court After US Supreme Court Decision
A Federal District Court in Michigan has dismissed a RICO [Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act] claim against Cassens Transportation Company and several other defendants. This is the third time the case was negatively reviewed by the US District Court in Michigan and follows a landmark decision in the US Supreme Court supporting the RICO action that flowed from an underlying by a workers' compensation action.
"The Court concludes that Plaintiffs' exclusive remedy for their claim that they were fraudulently denied benefits under the WDCA [Workers' Disability Compensation Act] lies within the exclusive administrative scheme set forth in the WDCA which forcloses their RICO claim."
Brown v Cassens Transportation Company, et al. No. 04-cv-72316, 2010 WL 3842373, Decided Sept. 27, 2010.
Click here to read more about RICO claims and workers' compensation.
For over 3 decades the Law Offices of Jon L. Gelman 1.973.696.7900 jon@gelmans.com have been representing injured workers and their families who have suffered work related accident and injuries.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)