Inside low-wage workers' plan to sue McDonald's — and win

Today's post was shared by Steven Greenhouse and comes from www.msnbc.com

The wage theft lawsuits filed against McDonald’s last week in New York, Michigan and California threaten to breach a wall that for decades has protected fast-food corporations from the demands of minimum wage workers. The accuse McDonald’s restaurants of various illegal labor practices. Many fast food workers, it’s alleged, have been taken “off the clock” either while working or while waiting on site to start or complete a shift; either way, federal law requires that the workers be compensated for their time. Another allegation is that many of these low-wage workers have gotten the cost of their uniforms deducted from their paychecks, effectively reducing their pay to below the federally or state-mandated minimum wage. Yet another allegation is that many fast food workers have been denied legally-mandated overtime pay. What’s unusual here aren’t the claims of labor law violations, which are common enough, but rather, who’s being blamed. The wall that fast food workers hope to blast through with these class-action suits is the franchise system. All of the lawsuits name McDonald’s itself as a defendant, even though most of the targeted restaurants are owned not by McDonald’s but by McDonald’s franchisees. Starting with Howard Johnson’s in the 1930s, franchising enabled fast-food companies largely to get out of the food business. Owning and operating the restaurants was mostly left to franchisees –...

[Click here to see the rest of this post]

Related articles

Related articles

• Subway leads fast food industry in underpaying workers (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Wage Theft -- Another Assault on Workers' Compensation (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Opinion: Employees getting shorted on pay (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• The minimum wage and the Danish Big Mac (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Fast food workers strike to double current wages (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• McDonald's Canada: A Guest Worker Program Under Scrutiny (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Labor, Then and Now (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Raising the Minimum Wage Is Good for the Economy (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)

The Vanishing Concept of a Job

While reviewing some historical cases today, I realized that what is missing from the workplace is the concept of "a job." America's economy has dramatically changed, and so have jobs that were once available in the workforce.

Even clearer is the fact that the concept of a job has disappeared. The idea of getting up in the morning and going regularly to a job has even vanished. The evolution changed slowly with the younger generation claiming that a job cycle transformed from a lifetime position to one lasting two years. Then the next stage in the evolution occurred, where the employee became a transient worker, and daily the job changed, No stable employer really exists.

This evolution has eroded the underlining framework of a functional workers' compensation program and the delivery of benefits. The injured worker becomes lost to the system, and a safe and secure workplace has become an illusion. Lost in the complexity is the adequate reporting of accidents and occupational disease, and the ability to accurately follow the evolution of latent diseases and medical conditions.

"A new trend in the U.S. labor market is reshaping how management and workers think  about employment, while at the same time reshaping the field of occupational safety  and health. More and more workers are being employed through “contingent work”  relationships. Day laborers hired on a street corner for construction or farming work,  warehouse laborers hired through staffing agencies, and hotel housekeepers supplied by  temp firms are common examples, because their employment is contingent upon shortterm fluctuations in demand for workers. Their shared experience is one of little job  security, low wages, minimal opportunities for advancement, and, all too often, hazardous working conditions. When hazards lead to work-related injuries, the contingent nature of the employment relationship can exacerbate the negative consequences for the injured worker and society. The worker might quickly find herself out of a job and, depending on the severity of the injury, the prospects of new employment might be slim. Employerbased health insurance is a rarity for contingent workers, so the costs of treating injuries are  typically shifted to the worker or the public at large. Because employers who hire workers on  a contingent basis do not directly pay for workers’ compensation and health insurance, they are likely to be insulated from premium adjustments based on the cost of workers’ injuries. As a result, employers of contingent labor may escape the financial incentives that are a main driver of business decisions to eliminate hazards for other workers."

Click here to read "At the Company’s Mercy: Protecting Contingent Workers from Unsafe Working Conditions"

Related articles

• The Obama Agenda: The Road to Workplace Wellness (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• OSHA Reaches Employer Agreement to Stop Discouraging Employee Accident Reports (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• The Hidden Cost of Jobs - Selling Fear (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Why Are Worker's Comp Claims Down (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Safety Begins at Home: Riddell All-American Sports Cited for Serious Safety Violations by OSHA (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)