Official Disabilities Guidelines Now Covers Diabetes

Today's post comes from guest author Paul J. McAndrew, Jr. from Paul McAndrew Law Firm.

While diabetes is not a work injury or illness, it can have a serious impact on the rate at which an injured worker recovers. For instance, people with diabetes may have a much harder time healing from a foot or leg injury.

The latest edition of the annual Official Disabilities Guidelines (ODG) has been released, including the latest ODG volume on treating patients. ODG Treatment is the nationally recognized standard for medicine in determining the scope and duration of medical treatment in workers’ compensation.

Should Employers Hire Smokers?

Workers' Compensation claims seem to increase with both complexity and severity when a worker is a smoker and suffers an occupational exposure. The class case is the synergistic effect that smoking has with some carcinogenic substance such as asbestos.

The ethical implications are reviewed this week in the New England Journal of Medicine

 where the authors seem to take the position that smokers should not be punished, but rather reformed.

"Finding employment is becoming increasingly difficult for smokers. Twenty-nine U.S. states have passed legislation prohibiting employers from refusing to hire job candidates because they smoke, but 21 states have no such restrictions. Many health care organizations, such as the Cleveland Clinic and Baylor Health Care System, and some large non–health care employers, including Scotts Miracle-Gro, Union Pacific Railroad, and Alaska Airlines, now have a policy of not hiring smokers — a practice opposed by 65% of Americans, according to a 2012 poll by Harris International. We agree with those polled, believing that categorically refusing to hire smokers is unethical: it results in a failure to care for people, places an additional burden on already-disadvantaged populations, and preempts interventions that more effectively promote smoking cessation."

Ciba, Toms RIver NJ and a Cancer Epidemic

Early in my workers' compensation career, during the 1980's, I was asked by a local attorney to participate in the prosecution of 3 brain cancer workers' compensation claims. The cases arose out of an alleged exposure to toxic substances while working at the Ciba-Geigy's chemical plant in Toms River, NJ. 

Being a notoriously zealous attorney, I undertook the claims. They were being defended personally by named partner in a mega-NJ liability firm. After several hearing dates, and my motion being granted for an on-site inspection of the premises with Judge being present, the claims were ended to the satisfaction of my clients.

The story of Ciba-Geigy and the plight of the employees and the community is now the subject of an insightful book, Toms River, A story of Science and Salvation authored by Dan Fagin.

Click here to hear the NPR Story - For Toms River, An Imperfect Salvation

The Going and Coming Rule: Parking Lot Injury Held Not Compensable

A NJ appellate court ruled that an employee who was severely injured in a parking lot as a result of a slip and fall was not entitled to workers’ compensation benefits since the injury occurred “off the premises” and the employer did not control the employee’s parking.

The Court also ruled, that even though a separate corporation that owned the parking lot, the corporate veil could not be pierced in absence of the proof of fraud by the employer. The employer merely rented the store premises and not the parking lot. 

Cottone v Medical Supply Corp. and NJ Manufacturers (Intervener) 
2013 WL 1136114 (N.J.Super.A.D.) Decided March 20, 2013

California: Million Dollar Verdict Reinstated in Asbestos Case

Court rules granting a Motion Not Withstanding the Verdict was premature in mesothelioma / asbestos exposure case.

"The trial court erred, both procedurally and substantively, by granting judgment notwithstanding the jury’s verdict.  The judgment must be reversed, automatically reinstating the original judgment entered on the jury’s verdict.  

"Because the judgment must be reinstated in the Webbs’ favor, we do not consider their appeal from the jury’s verdict denying their consumer-expectation products-liability claim, which they made expressly contingent on this court’s failure to “otherwise reverse and order judgment” on the failure-to-warn or general negligence claims.

Webb v Special Electric Company Inc. 
www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/B233189.DOC

Related articles

• Failure to Remove Asbestos Property Results in Guilty Plea (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Asbestos Disease Remains a Problem Despite Lower Consumption in the US (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Proposed Asbestos Legislation Called "A Subterfuge" to Alter the Civil Justice System (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• How to Protect Public Employees and Communities From Asbestos Exposure (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• All Forms of Asbestos Cause Cancer (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)

Laundry in Paterson NJ Fined $165,000 by OSHA for Safety and Health Violations

Commercial laundries are the cause of many workers' compensation claims from toxic exposures and machine accidents. Enforce of safety and health laws goes a long way to prevent accidents at commercial laundry facilities.

The U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration has cited Brite Services Inc., doing business as Star Laundry, for 39 serious safety and health violations found at its commercial laundry facility in Paterson. Inspectors were prompted by a complaint alleging the company would not allow workers to leave the building during an emergency. Proposed penalties total $164,700.

OSHA found electrical hazards and an obstructed and improperly marked exit route. Additional violations include: allowing employees to potentially be struck by traffic while transporting laundry bins from one building to another while crossing a public street; failing to provide a cover and guardrails for open pits; provide a handrail for the stairway; evaluate the workplace for permit-required confined spaces; post signs informing workers of confined spaces; and develop a written confined space permit program. Other violations include failing to establish an energy control program for performing maintenance/servicing work; train power industrial truck operators; take powered industrial trucks in need of repair out-of-service; insulate or cover steam pipes less than 7 feet from the floor; properly guard machines; implement a hearing conservation program for workers exposed to noise levels at 88 and 89 decibels; ensure safety goggle usage; provide an unblocked eyewash station; develop a written hazard communication program; and provide hazard communication training.

"The vast number and range of safety and health hazards observed by OSHA at this facility indicates the lack of a functioning safety and health management system," said Lisa Levy, director of OSHA's area office in Hasbrouck Heights. "Each employer is responsible for ensuring a safe and healthful work environment, which Brite Services did not do. This company has the opportunity now to educate itself, correct these hazards and protect its workers."

The citations can be viewed at http://www.osha.gov/ooc/citations/briteservices_641138and658718_0314_13.pdf*.

Brite Services Inc. has 15 business days from receipt of the citations to comply, request an informal conference with the OSHA area director in Hasbrouck Heights, or contest the citations and proposed penalties before the independent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.

Related articles

• OSHA Cites NJ Recycling Company for Safety Violations Following Worker Amputation (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Stucco Contractor in NJ Receives OSHA Fines $70,000+ for Scaffolding Violations (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• OSHA fines Englewood, NJ, surgical center $68,000 for failing to protect workers exposed to bloodborne pathogen hazards (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Why Do Roofers Fall From Roofs? Is it just because of gravity? (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Unsafe to Travel - "America is one big pothole" (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Silica Linked to a Fatal and Compensable Lung Cancer (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)

The Hazards of Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizers

Alcohol-based hand sanitizers now proliferate the workplace. Concern has been raised over medical issues created by their use, especially for pregnant women who are health care workers. Additionally the fragrances used may be toxic.

Virginia Evans and Peter Orris from the University of Illinois authored a Letter to the Editor on this topic in the Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine ( Vol 54(1):3, Jan 2012).

“…exposure to alcohol-based hand sanitizers would, at most, lead to very low blood alcohol levels… if an additional risk reduction is desired by pregnant health care workers, work practices should be modified to allow the use of soap and water as a substitute for the alcohol-based hand sanitizer.”

See also http://www.ewg.org/skindeep/browse.php?

Related articles

• Alberta hospitals remove hand-sanitizer bottles after man's 2010 death (ctvnews.ca)
• Child cancer patient catches on fire at hospital: Hand sanitizer to blame? (voxxi.com)
• Hand Sanitizer Poisoning, Fires and more. (dailybragger.com)
• Hand Sanitizers: Do They Help Stop All Germs? (boston.cbslocal.com)
• Girl talks about hand sanitizer fire in hospital (nwcn.com)