Copyright

(c) 2010-2024 Jon L Gelman, All Rights Reserved.

Friday, August 22, 2014

How a Part-Time Pay Penalty Hits Working Mothers

Today's post was shared by The New York Times and comes from www.nytimes.com

Women get paid less than men in almost all jobs, but when women in low-wage jobs need to take time off work to care for children, they are at an even greater disadvantage.
If all employees got paid the same hourly amount (assuming they’re equally productive on the job), it would go a long way toward closing the gender pay gap, according to Claudia Goldin, a Harvard economist who has analyzed income data across occupations, including a new set of unpublished data on hourly workers that she prepared for the White House Summit on Working Families in June.
Instead, she has found, people in professions like law and finance get paid disproportionately more when they work extra-long hours. At the other end of the spectrum, people in low-wage jobs do not benefit much from working more, but get paid disproportionately less per hour when they work fewer than 40 hours a week. The penalty is similar for men and women — but ends up hurting women more, because they are far more likely to take breaks during their careers or need shorter or predictable hours to handle child care.


Working fewer hours in low-paying jobs, Ms. Goldin said, “can get even nastier, because of the problem that flexibility here is not just the number of hours but whether you even know which hours you’re going to be working.”
While the challenges are different at high-income and low-income jobs, the bottom line is the same: Employees, particularly parents, need some measure of...
[Click here to see the rest of this post]

Florida Court Holds Exclusive Remedy Facially Unconstitutional

Today's post authored by The Hon David Langham is shared from http://flojcc.blogspot.com/
For some reason, I have found myself thinking of great comedians this week (veiled reference to the loss of one of America's greatest last Sunday). I am always a fan of those that make me laugh. One that came to mind yesterday afternoon is Jim Carrey and his portrayal of the Grinch in Ron Howard's modern adaptation. There is a scene in which the Grinch is somewhat forcibly fed "pudding" by the Whos, with each spoonful receiving a comment. This scene ends when one spoon is shoved in his mouth with the comment "this is not pudding," to which he replies with some alarm (and a priceless facial expression) "what IS IT?!?"
I blog twice a week, usually on Mondays and Wednesdays. I have a lot of respect for those who have the energy to produce more often or even daily like Bob Wilson (Bob's Cluttered Desk) and David DePaolo (DePaolo's Workcomp World). But I take to the blogophere this morning because the world of workers' compensation has many questions this morning. Could August 13, 2014 be a "red letter day" in workers' compensation across the country?
Yesterday, a Circuit Judge in Miami concluded that Florida's workers' compensation law is unconstitutional on its face. That is, there is no circumstance whatever in which Florida's exclusive remedy is constitutional. There will be much head scratching this day and many will be as confused as the Grinch and they analyze this decision and the equivalent of a cry "what IS...
[Click here to see the rest of this post]

Thursday, August 21, 2014

NGHP Alert Clarifying MSP Criteria for Exposure, Ingestion, and Implantation Cases

CMS on 8/19/14 issues a new Alert "NGHP Alert Clarifying MSP Criteria for Exposure, Ingestion, and Implantation Cases."

For incidents after December 5, 1980 this Alert should be reviewed to determine CMS obligations.

Click here to review the Alert.

Now Google Street View Is Mapping Gas Pipeline Leaks

Today's post was shared by Mother Jones and comes from www.motherjones.com

This story first appeared in Grist and is republished here as part of the Climate Change collaboration.

Some of those Google cars that drive around photographing streetscapes and embarrassing moments have captured something extra—something that should embarrass major utilities. The cars were kitted out by University of Colorado scientists with sensors that sniff out natural gas leaking from underground pipelines. These methane-heavy leaks contribute to global warming, waste money, and can fuel explosions.

The sensor-equipped cars cruised the streets of Boston, New York's Staten Island, and Indianapolis. They returned to sites where methane spikes were detected to confirm the presence of a leak. The results were released Wednesday by the Environmental Defense Fund, which coordinated the project, revealing just how leaky old and metallic pipelines can be, such as those used in the East Coast cities studied, particularly when compared with noncorrosive pipes like those beneath Indianapolis.

About one leak was discovered for each mile driven in Boston, Mass.:

Boston

The findings were similar in Staten Island, NY.:

Staten Island
Staten Island

In Indianapolis, Ind., by contrast, about one leak was found for every 200 miles that the cars covered:

Indianapolis

[Click here to see the rest of this post]

California Commission on Health and Safety and Workers’ Compensation (CHSWC)

Today's post is authored by Julius Young of the California Bar and shared from workerscompzone.com
This past Friday the California Commission on Health and Safety and Workers’ Compensation (CHSWC) met in Oakland.
If there was little policy drama in the policy presentations, other aspects of the meeting had drama.
Apparently concerned that protesters or rowdy commenters would disrupt the meeting, CHSWC staffers or members arranged for a watchful presence from 2 CHP officers. A flyer outlining a conduct code for public comment was distributed. Public comments were limited to 2 minutes.
The public was allowed to express opinions, but not to ask questions of the various think tank consultants and DWC staff giving updates on various topics.
When loud and spirited comments by Berkeley labor activist Steve Zeltzer went overtime, CHP staff moved in closer, leading to charges from  Zeltzer that dissent was being locked down.
One frustrated interpreter was cut off at two minutes and forced to file another request to speak form to get more speaking time. I think she was from Southern California, meaning that she traveled a long way if she was only allowed to speak for 2 minutes.
Later, an injured worker in the audience seemed bewildered that she could not direct questions to the CHSWC commissioners, half of whom are appointees from labor unions and half from employers. CHSWC member Christy Bouma of the California Professional Firefighters tried to...
[Click here to see the rest of this post]

SeaWorld won't appeal ruling keeping whale trainers out of water

SeaWorld Entertainment has decided not to go to the U.S. Supreme Court to appeal a citation barring trainers from performing with its killer whales.
The company said in a regulatory filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission last week that it has "elected to not pursue further appeal."
In April, the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C., upheld a citation against SeaWorld issued in mid-2010 by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. The agency accused SeaWorld of endangering trainers by allowing them to perform in unprotected contact with the whales.
OSHA, which spent six months investigating SeaWorld after the February 2010 death of Orlando trainer Dawn Brancheau, recommended that trainers be allowed to perform with killer whales only when protected by physical barriers or sufficient distance. That standard effectively makes it impossible for trainers to swim with the whales.
"The safety of our staff and the welfare of our animals are SeaWorld's highest priorities, and since February 2010 we have made significant safety improvements. ... We are focused on the implementation of those improvements moving forward," SeaWorld said in a prepared statement. "As such, we opted not to pursue further appeal of the court's decision, which was based on how we were conducting our killer whale program prior to February 2010."
SeaWorld likely realized that an appeal of the ruling would be "a very difficult case to win," said Bob...
[Click here to see the rest of this post]

Wednesday, August 20, 2014

Cal/OSHA fines aviation company in death of LAX baggage worker

Today's post is shared from the latimes.com

State officials fined an aviation services company $77,250 on Wednesday for five safety violations related to the death of a baggage worker in February at Los Angeles International Airport.

The California Division of Occupational Safety and Health leveled the penalty against Menzies Aviation, whose employee, Cesar Valenzuela, 51, died after being thrown from a baggage tug that did not have a functional seat belt.

Cal/OSHA investigators said seatbelts were required for the vehicle and that Menzies' safety policies related to baggage tugs did not require and even discouraged the use of restraints in certain areas of LAX.

"This fatality could have been prevented with a well thought out and implemented safety plan as is required for all worksites in California," said Christine Baker, director of the state Department of Industrial Relations.

Menzies and other aviation service companies contract with airlines to provide cabin cleaners, security personnel, custodians, wheel-chair assistants and baggage handlers.

The citations prompted union officials and service company employees to renew their calls for improvements to working conditions at LAX, the nation's third-busiest airport.

"Workers punching in at the start of a shift ought to be able to finish the day without risking their health or losing their life,"...


[Click here to see the rest of this post]