The U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration today announced a final rule to improve protections for workers exposed to respirable silica dust. The rule will curb lung cancer, silicosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and kidney disease in America's workers by limiting their exposure to respirable crystalline silica.
Copyright
(c) 2010-2025 Jon L Gelman, All Rights Reserved.
Showing posts with label United States Department of Labor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label United States Department of Labor. Show all posts
Sunday, March 27, 2016
Friday, September 25, 2015
Employees exposed to dangerous workplace hazards at Pennsauken aluminum services plant
A aluminum company fined $308K
OSHA's investigation found 44 safety violations, including one willful:
Employer name: Aluminum Shapes LLC, 9000 River Road, Delair, New Jersey.
Citations issued: On Sept. 21, 2015, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration cited the company for one willful, three repeat, 35 serious, and five other-than-serious violations.
Investigation findings: OSHA launched an investigation April 16, 2015, after being notified that an employee suffered a broken leg on March 24 while operating a crane and was hospitalized. The company failed to report the incident to the agency within 24 hours, as required.
The willful citation involved electrical equipment with damaged parts that could adversely affect the safe operation or mechanical strength of the equipment. In addition, pendant control boxes for a crane were damaged, malfunctioning and not clearly marked; damaged slings were not removed from service; and metal saws were not guarded to prevent employee exposure, resulting in the repeat citations. Unguarded floor openings, lack of machine guarding and confined space training were among the serious violations.
The other-than-serious violations included the employer's failure to report the hospitalization and an inadequate hazard communication program.
Proposed Penalties: $308,000
Quote: "The number of safety violations found at Aluminum Shapes' plant is completely unacceptable. This employer blatantly ignored known safety requirements, causing a preventable worker injury," said Robert Kulick, OSHA's regional administrator in New York. "This company is now paying a hefty price for its negligence. The hazards identified in the investigation should be immediately addressed to prevent future incidents and ensure worker safety."
View the citations: https://www.osha.gov/ooc/citations/Aluminum_Shapes_LLC_1059368_Sept_23_2015.pdf
Employer name: Aluminum Shapes LLC, 9000 River Road, Delair, New Jersey.
Citations issued: On Sept. 21, 2015, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration cited the company for one willful, three repeat, 35 serious, and five other-than-serious violations.
Investigation findings: OSHA launched an investigation April 16, 2015, after being notified that an employee suffered a broken leg on March 24 while operating a crane and was hospitalized. The company failed to report the incident to the agency within 24 hours, as required.
The willful citation involved electrical equipment with damaged parts that could adversely affect the safe operation or mechanical strength of the equipment. In addition, pendant control boxes for a crane were damaged, malfunctioning and not clearly marked; damaged slings were not removed from service; and metal saws were not guarded to prevent employee exposure, resulting in the repeat citations. Unguarded floor openings, lack of machine guarding and confined space training were among the serious violations.
The other-than-serious violations included the employer's failure to report the hospitalization and an inadequate hazard communication program.
Proposed Penalties: $308,000
Quote: "The number of safety violations found at Aluminum Shapes' plant is completely unacceptable. This employer blatantly ignored known safety requirements, causing a preventable worker injury," said Robert Kulick, OSHA's regional administrator in New York. "This company is now paying a hefty price for its negligence. The hazards identified in the investigation should be immediately addressed to prevent future incidents and ensure worker safety."
View the citations: https://www.osha.gov/ooc/citations/Aluminum_Shapes_LLC_1059368_Sept_23_2015.pdf
Related articles
- Furniture plant workers repeatedly exposed to safety and health hazards in Northern New Jersey (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- NJ general contractor repeatedly exposed construction workers to fall hazards OSHA fines New Homes Construction Inc. $40,480 (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Newark gas manufacturer repeatedly exposed employees to workplace hazards (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- OSHA cites Bergen Regional Medical Center after 8 employees assaulted or threatened by patients (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- OSHA fines Dayton, New Jersey, companies $64,200 for blocked exit routes and chemical, noise and energy control hazards (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- OSHA Fines Frost King $90K for Workplace Hazards (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Reports of Worker Fatalities during Flowback Operations (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- FedEx cited by OSHA $44,000 for machine guard hazard (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
Monday, April 27, 2015
The Circus: OSHA Settlement
Ringling Bros. to enhance safety for all aerial acts after settlement agreement
9 employees injured in May 2014 fall in Providence, Rhode Island
Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus, will implement ongoing safety enhancements in aerial acts to protect employees against injuries like those sustained by its aerialists during a May 4, 2014, performance in Providence, Rhode Island. Feld Entertainment Inc., headquartered in Palmetto, Florida, owns the circus.
9 employees injured in May 2014 fall in Providence, Rhode Island
Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus, will implement ongoing safety enhancements in aerial acts to protect employees against injuries like those sustained by its aerialists during a May 4, 2014, performance in Providence, Rhode Island. Feld Entertainment Inc., headquartered in Palmetto, Florida, owns the circus.
Friday, August 29, 2014
OSHA Fines Frost King $90K for Workplace Hazards
Workers willfully exposed to amputation hazards at Paterson, New Jersey, manufacturing facility
Film Pak Extrusion facing more than $90K in OSHA penalties
Workers at Film Pak Extrusion LLC were exposed to amputation and other safety and health hazards according to an investigation by the U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration. The company's Paterson manufacturing facility has been cited for one willful and 12 serious workplace violations related to the dangerous conditions. The company manufactures products under the name Frost King, a well-known, do-it-yourself brand of supplies for contractors distributed in stores like Home Depot and Lowes throughout the United States. OSHA initiated the inspection in February and is proposing $90,300 in penalties.
"Machines left without required guards can cause catastrophic injury to workers, including amputation and death. One slip can end a worker's life or livelihood, and employers can prevent that," said Lisa Levy, director of OSHA's Hasbrouck Heights Area Office. "Film Pak Extrusion has a responsibility to put worker safety first."
OSHA inspectors cited the company with a willful violation, with a $56,000 penalty, due to a lack of machine guarding. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, approximately 9,000 New Jersey workers were injured* in the manufacturing industry during 2011, the most recent year with available data. BLS reported 8,200 New Jersey manufacturing workers were injured in 2010. The rate of incidents grew from 3.2 cases per 100 workers in 2010* to 3.6 in 2011*. A willful violation is one committed with intentional, knowing or voluntary disregard for the law's requirements, or with plain indifference to worker safety and health.
Carrying $34,300 in penalties, serious violations were cited for the following:
An obstructed exit route
Lack of a lockout/tagout program
Powered industrial trucks not inspected prior to use
Lack of a hearing conservation program
Failure to conduct audiometric testing
Failure to provide hearing protection and training on hearing protection and noise hazards
Failure to maintain washing facilities
A serious violation occurs when there is substantial probability that death or serious physical harm could result from a hazard about which the employer knew or should have known.
Film Pak Extrusion has 15 business days from receipt of its citations and proposed penalties to comply, meet informally with OSHA's area director, or contest the findings before the independent Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission.
Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, employers are responsible for providing safe and healthful workplaces for their employees. OSHA's role is to ensure these conditions for America's working men and women by setting and enforcing standards, and providing training, education and assistance.
Film Pak Extrusion facing more than $90K in OSHA penalties
Workers at Film Pak Extrusion LLC were exposed to amputation and other safety and health hazards according to an investigation by the U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration. The company's Paterson manufacturing facility has been cited for one willful and 12 serious workplace violations related to the dangerous conditions. The company manufactures products under the name Frost King, a well-known, do-it-yourself brand of supplies for contractors distributed in stores like Home Depot and Lowes throughout the United States. OSHA initiated the inspection in February and is proposing $90,300 in penalties.
"Machines left without required guards can cause catastrophic injury to workers, including amputation and death. One slip can end a worker's life or livelihood, and employers can prevent that," said Lisa Levy, director of OSHA's Hasbrouck Heights Area Office. "Film Pak Extrusion has a responsibility to put worker safety first."
OSHA inspectors cited the company with a willful violation, with a $56,000 penalty, due to a lack of machine guarding. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, approximately 9,000 New Jersey workers were injured* in the manufacturing industry during 2011, the most recent year with available data. BLS reported 8,200 New Jersey manufacturing workers were injured in 2010. The rate of incidents grew from 3.2 cases per 100 workers in 2010* to 3.6 in 2011*. A willful violation is one committed with intentional, knowing or voluntary disregard for the law's requirements, or with plain indifference to worker safety and health.
Carrying $34,300 in penalties, serious violations were cited for the following:
An obstructed exit route
Lack of a lockout/tagout program
Powered industrial trucks not inspected prior to use
Lack of a hearing conservation program
Failure to conduct audiometric testing
Failure to provide hearing protection and training on hearing protection and noise hazards
Failure to maintain washing facilities
A serious violation occurs when there is substantial probability that death or serious physical harm could result from a hazard about which the employer knew or should have known.
Film Pak Extrusion has 15 business days from receipt of its citations and proposed penalties to comply, meet informally with OSHA's area director, or contest the findings before the independent Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission.
Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, employers are responsible for providing safe and healthful workplaces for their employees. OSHA's role is to ensure these conditions for America's working men and women by setting and enforcing standards, and providing training, education and assistance.
….
Jon L. Gelman of Wayne NJ is the author of NJ Workers’ Compensation Law (West-Thompson-Reuters) and co-author of the national treatise, Modern Workers’ Compensation Law (West-Thompson-Reuters). For over 4 decades the Law Offices of Jon L Gelman 1.973.696.7900 jon@gelmans.com have been representing injured workers and their families who have suffered occupational accidents and illnesses.
Related articles
- Stucco Contractor in NJ Receives OSHA Fines $70,000+ for Scaffolding Violations (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- OSHA Cites NJ Recycling Company for Safety Violations Following Worker Amputation (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- OSHA cites New York contractor for exposing workers to fall and other hazards (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- OSHA Sanctions Chicago Company With $325,700 in Fines for Safety Violations (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- OSHA cites Brick, NJ-based contractor for continuing to expose workers to falls and other hazards at Secaucus work site (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- OSHA fines two companies $130,500 for trenching hazards at Kearny, NJ, site (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- OSHA fines South River, NJ, masonry contractor nearly $91,000 for fall, scaffold hazard (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
Wednesday, August 20, 2014
Cal/OSHA fines aviation company in death of LAX baggage worker
Today's post is shared from the latimes.com
The California Division of Occupational Safety and Health leveled the penalty against Menzies Aviation, whose employee, Cesar Valenzuela, 51, died after being thrown from a baggage tug that did not have a functional seat belt.
Cal/OSHA investigators said seatbelts were required for the vehicle and that Menzies' safety policies related to baggage tugs did not require and even discouraged the use of restraints in certain areas of LAX.
"This fatality could have been prevented with a well thought out and implemented safety plan as is required for all worksites in California," said Christine Baker, director of the state Department of Industrial Relations.
Menzies and other aviation service companies contract with airlines to provide cabin cleaners, security personnel, custodians, wheel-chair assistants and baggage handlers.
The citations prompted union officials and service company employees to renew their calls for improvements to working conditions at LAX, the nation's third-busiest airport.
"Workers punching in at the start of a shift ought to be able to finish the day without risking their health or losing their life,"...
[Click here to see the rest of this post]
Related articles
- OSHA kicks off summer campaign to prevent heat-related illnesses and fatalities among outdoor workers (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Welcome to OSHA's Campaign to Prevent Heat Illness in Outdoor Workers (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Preventing Worker Injuries and Deaths from Backing Construction Vehicles and Equipment at Roadway Construction Worksites (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- New App to Keep Workers Cool and Safe (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- OSHA Sanctions Chicago Company With $325,700 in Fines for Safety Violations (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- OSHA Cites NJ Recycling Company for Safety Violations Following Worker Amputation (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
Thursday, August 7, 2014
Wilcox Farms Fatal Silo Collapse - Citations
Today's post comes from guest author Kit Case, from Causey Law Firm.
By Kit Case from Causey Law Firm
The Department of Labor & Industries (L&I) issued a press release on June 4th stating that it has cited Wilcox Farms Feedmill, Inc., of Roy for safety violations related to a fatal silo collapse last December. One worker died after he was engulfed in more than 400 tons of corn that spilled out of the silo.
Wilcox Farms issued a press release on February 12, 2014 describing the incident, the emergency response to it and how competitor farms came to the business's rescue to provide feed for the chickens in the days after the accident.
“As an employer, especially a family business, it’s the worst thing you could ever imagine happening,” said Andy Wilcox. “The fact that we weren’t able to find Steve for two days was really tough.”
Wilcox has been cited for one “willful” and two “serious” safety violations with total penalties of $67,200. The state investigation found shortcomings in how the company maintained and managed the silo, and inadequate employee training.
A serious violation exists in a workplace if there is a substantial probability that worker death or serious physical harm could result from a hazardous condition. A willful violation can be issued when L&I has evidence of plain indifference, a substitution of judgment or an intentional disregard to a hazard or rule.
The day the 60-foot tall silo collapsed, two employees were working on feedmill operations, which included discharging corn using an auger in the silo. The unloading auger was not working that day, so they opened a side discharge door to allow corn to flow onto the outer portion of the auger. During that process, the silo collapsed and 400-500 tons of corn spilled out, engulfing one worker who was unable to escape.
“Worker fatalities are tragic and preventable,” said Anne Soiza, assistant director of L&I’s Division of Occupational Safety and Health. “Our state requires all employers to provide safe and healthy workplaces. We fully expect Wilcox will correct the hazards and practices that haven’t been fixed already to ensure their employees are as safe as can be.”
Wilcox Farms has 15 working days to appeal the citation.
As part of the investigation, L&I hired an engineer to assess the structural integrity of the silo.
The investigation found four instances where Wilcox was not following proper silo operation and maintenance procedures that may have contributed to the collapse. For example, if corn is added or discharged improperly or the silo is overfilled, tons of grain could build up at an uneven rate and then suddenly shift and create instability. The four instances were:
- A side discharge system was used to unload corn instead of the manufacturer’s standard procedure of withdrawing grain from the vertical center via the auger. The side discharge system was not installed, designed or supplied by an authorized dealer or contractor.
- The silo was overfilled all the way to the roof and past the maximum fill level of one inch from the top of the vertical walls.
- The silo had been previously repaired with a patch over a rupture of the wall due to corrosion. The repair was not made with corrugated material and was not done in a way to ensure structural stability. Also, it wasn’t assessed by a structural engineer or the silo manufacturer.
- There were previous occasions during which the company had simultaneously filled the silo while it was being discharged.
L&I concluded that this was a willful violation with a proposed penalty of $56,000.
The investigation also found two serious violations with proposed penalties of $5,600 each:
- Employees weren’t trained in specific procedures and safety practices for silo operations and maintenance.
- The employer did not maintain the silos in accordance with the manufacturer’s maintenance and safety procedures.
Wilcox Farms has 15 working days to appeal the citation. For a copy of the citation, please contact L&I Public Affairs at 360-902-5673.
Penalty money paid as a result of a citation is placed in the workers’ compensation supplemental pension fund, helping workers and families of those who have died on the job.
Related articles
- Klickitat County Lumber Company Fined (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Stucco Contractor in NJ Receives OSHA Fines $70,000+ for Scaffolding Violations (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Why We're Still Killing Workers in the USA (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Washington Workers' Advisor Blog Launched (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- OSHA Cites Nebraska Food Supplement Plant for 10 Violations (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- NFL Bounties - Intentional Injuries (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
Thursday, July 31, 2014
Taking Job-Driven Training to Scale
Today's post was shared by US Labor Department and comes from social.dol.gov
Connecting the right worker with the right job is key to our vision of opportunity for all. At the Labor Department, it’s how we’re working to help more people punch their ticket to the middle class. That’s why we’re investing in proven strategies that connect ready-to-work Americans with ready-to-be-filled jobs. As part of this effort, in April, we announced the availability of funds through a new Job-Driven National Emergency Grants program to help dislocated workers who have lost a job through no fault of their own. And this week, I am very excited to announce the awards – nearly $155 million to 32 states, Puerto Rico and the Cherokee Tribal Nation – to help fund work-based training programs, like Registered Apprenticeship and on-the-job training, which have a proven record of success. That’s $155 million to give workers the chance to “learn and earn,” developing skills while earning a paycheck. With on-the-job training, employers who participate can use this funding to offset the cost of training and temporarily cover a portion of the wages for the people they hire. We know these programs work. Earlier this year, I met with Gary Locke from New Hampshire, who – after being laid off for more than a year – found a job through the state’s innovative on-the-job training program. The funds we’ve announced this week will expand programs that helped Gary to more states around the country. Nevada, for... |
Related articles
- Subway leads fast food industry in underpaying workers
- Inside low-wage workers' plan to sue McDonald's - and win
- US Dept of Labor Combats Child Labor in Global Supply Chain
- Fast-Food Workers Intensify Fight for $15 an Hour
- OSHA kicks off summer campaign to prevent heat-related illnesses and fatalities among outdoor workers
- Administration Urges Rate Changes for US FELA Benefits
Friday, July 25, 2014
OSHA issues new directive to keep communication tower workers safe
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration has updated its Communications Tower directive regarding the use of hoist systems used to move workers to and from workstations on communication towers. This follows an alarming increase in preventable injuries and fatalities at communication tower work sites.
More fatalities occurred in this industry in 2013 than in the previous two years combined. This disturbing trend appears to be continuing, with nine worker deaths occurring so far in 2014.
"This directive ensures that communication tower workers are protected regardless of the type of the work they are doing on communication towers," said Dr. David Michaels, assistant secretary of labor for occupational safety and health. "Employers and cell tower owners and operators must make sure workers are properly trained and protected."
The directive outlines the proper use of hoist and other fall arrest systems and includes detailed information on how to hoist people safely. The directive updates a 2002 enforcement policy, which only covered the hoisting of workers to workstations during new tower erection activities. The updated policy covers any work on a communication tower - including both maintenance and new construction - that involves the use of a hoist to lift workers from one elevated workstation to another.
The release of the new directive is the latest in a series of actions OSHA has taken to improve cell tower safety. The agency is collaborating with the National Association of Tower Erectors and other industry stakeholders to ensure that every communication tower employer understands how to protect workers performing this high-hazard work.
OSHA sent a letter to communication tower employers urging compliance and strict adherence to safety standards and common-sense practices. OSHA has also created a new Web page targeting the issues surrounding communication tower work. This outreach follows a November 2013 memo to OSHA's compliance officers and regional administrators mandating increased attention, education and data collection on the industry. OSHA continues to investigate past incidents and will issue the results as they become available. Communication towers are on the agency's regulatory agenda and OSHA expects to issue a Request for Information later this year.
Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, employers are responsible for providing safe and healthful workplaces for their employees. OSHA's role is to ensure these conditions for America's working men and women by setting and enforcing standards, and providing training, education and assistance. For more information, visit www.osha.gov.
….
Jon L. Gelman of Wayne NJ is the author of NJ Workers’ Compensation Law (West-Thompson-Reuters) and co-author of the national treatise, Modern Workers’ Compensation Law (West-Thompson-Reuters). For over 4 decades the Law Offices of Jon L Gelman 1.973.696.7900 jon@gelmans.com have been representing injured workers and their families who have suffered occupational accidents and illnesses.
Related articles
- 'No more falling workers': OSHA raises alarm over cell tower deaths (mysafetysign.com)
- OSHA Sanctions Chicago Company With $325,700 in Fines for Safety Violations (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- OSHA Cites NJ Store For Safety Violations - Blocked Exits (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Stucco Contractor in NJ Receives OSHA Fines $70,000+ for Scaffolding Violations (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Worker Fatality in Moorestown NJ Leads to OSHA Citation (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- OSHA Cites Nebraska Food Supplement Plant for 10 Violations (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
United Airlines cited at Newark, N.J., airport for repeat and serious safety hazards
Company faces $101,300 penalty following OSHA inspection
United Airlines Inc. has exposed ground operation workers at the Newark airport to hazardous conditions, prompting the U.S. Department of Labor"s Occupational Safety and Health Administration to issue 16 citations and propose penalties of $101,300.
The safety violations were found during a January 2014 inspection that is part of an OSHA effort to focus on workplaces with high rates of injuries and illness. The inspection found three repeat violations that had been discovered by OSHA during inspections in 2011 and 2013.
"United Airlines should immediately address these safety violations to prevent worker injuries and ensure a safe workplace," said Kris Hoffman, director of OSHA"s Parsippany Area Office. "These workers face electrical hazards, falls, and being struck-by objects and equipment daily. Their safety is critical. Airline ground operations safety is of vital importance, not only to the workers, but to the millions of Americans who depend on air travel every day."
Carrying a $55,000 penalty, the repeat violations were cited for United Continental Holdings Inc."s failing to clearly mark exits located inside facilities where food service employees, baggage handlers and gate agents worked; keep unused openings closed on an electrical box where conduit or knockout plugs were located; and use extension cords as a substitute for required permanent wiring at Newark Liberty International Airport. A repeat violation exists when an employer previously has been cited for the same or a similar violation at any other facility in federal enforcement states within the last five years.
The company was cited for nine serious violations, with a $46,300 penalty, including exposing aircraft mechanics to fall hazards while working from a ground support vehicle and struck-by hazards by storing materials, such as aircraft parts including landing gear tires and aircraft struts and fasteners, on storage racks, which were damaged and not anchored. United Airlines also failed to:
- Properly guard equipment, store materials and dispose of waste materials.
- Ensure exits were unobstructed and wide enough and place directional signs in areas where exits were not apparent.
- Ensure employees operating tugs to transport luggage used seat belts.
- Use power strips according to manufacturer"s recommendations.
- Use ladders for purposes intended by the manufacturer, and remove damaged ladders from service.
A serious citation is issued when there is substantial probability that death or serious physical harm could result and the employer knew, or should have known, of the hazard.
Three other safety violations involved failing to maintain clean and orderly work areas, and not providing fire extinguisher training for ground operation workers and welders. Additionally, powered industrial trucks in need of repair were not taken out of service, and placards on the trucks were illegible.
The citations can be viewed at http://www.osha.gov/ooc/citations/UnitedAirlines_954623_0710_14.pdf*
For more information on safety and health in the airline industry, visit https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/airline_industry/index.html
United Airlines has 15 business days from receipt of its citations and penalties to comply, ask for an informal conference with OSHA"s area director, or contest the citations and proposed penalties before the independent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.
To ask questions, obtain compliance assistance, file a complaint, or report workplace hospitalizations, fatalities or situations posing imminent danger to workers, the public should call OSHA"s toll-free hotline at 800-321-OSHA (6742) or the agency"s Parsippany Area Office at 973-263-1003.
Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, employers are responsible for providing safe and healthful workplaces for their employees. OSHA"s role is to ensure these conditions for America"s working men and women by setting and enforcing standards, and providing training, education and assistance. For more information, visit http://www.osha.gov.
….
Jon L. Gelman of Wayne NJ is the author of NJ Workers’ Compensation Law (West-Thompson-Reuters) and co-author of the national treatise, Modern Workers’ Compensation Law (West-Thompson-Reuters). For over 4 decades the Law Offices of Jon L Gelman 1.973.696.7900 jon@gelmans.com have been representing injured workers and their families who have suffered occupational accidents and illnesses.
Related articles
- OSHA Sanctions Chicago Company With $325,700 in Fines for Safety Violations (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- OSHA Proposes Fines for NJ Uniform & Laundry Company (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- OSHA Cites Nebraska Food Supplement Plant for 10 Violations (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- OSHA Cites NJ Recycling Company for Safety Violations Following Worker Amputation (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- OSHA Cites NJ Store For Safety Violations - Blocked Exits (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Worker Fatality in Moorestown NJ Leads to OSHA Citation (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- OSHA cites Brick, NJ-based contractor for continuing to expose workers to falls and other hazards at Secaucus work site (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
Tuesday, July 22, 2014
U.S., state officials ask about asbestos
Today's post is shared from timesunion.com/
[Click here to see the rest of this post]
Federal and state environmental agents have interviewed the former city engineer and his assistant about the city's handling of two demolition projects involving asbestos, a person with knowledge of the matter said. The emergency razing of 4-6-8-10 King St. in August 2013 and the tearing down of buildings at the King Fuels site in South Troy this year have drawn the attention of criminal investigators from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the state Department of Environmental Conservation. The agents asked Russ Reeves, the former city engineer, and Barbara Tozzi, a former city engineering assistant, about the circumstances of the work and the handling of asbestos, the person, who wished to remain anonymous, said. The agents also queried Reeves regarding the nature of relationships at city hall and the involvement of individuals in the projects. Stop-work orders were issued for both demolition projects by the state because of concerns about procedures for dealing with asbestos in the 19th-century structures. The questions were similar to those asked by the FBI when one of its agents interviewed Reeves earlier this year. The state Labor Department also has investigated the asbestos removal. The city's request for proposals for the development of the Scolite site on the Hudson River in South Troy also was discussed in the latest interview, the person said. Reeves resigned as city engineer, saying that city officials were not concerned about public safety when the... |
Related articles
- National Asbestos Week, April 1-7, 2014
- Deadly Asbestos Exposure Threat Left by Hurricane Sandy
- EPA Reaches Agreement with Two Companies Requiring the Cleanup of Asbestos at a School and Head Start Facility in Penuelas, Puerto Rico
- Unlawful Asbestos Removal Results in Criminal Charges
- Asbestos and Cigarettes
Sunday, July 20, 2014
Port of Seattle, Eagle Marine Agree to Make Terminal 5 Big Ship Ready
Today's post is shared from Kit Case of Causey Law (Longshore Law Firm) of Seattle Washington.
The Port of Seattle and Eagle Marine Services (EMS), operator of Terminal 5, announced on May
16th a proposal to relocate its cargo and breakbulk activities to another terminal so that the port can modernize Terminal 5 to handle the bigger ships that are changing international shipping.
“If we’re going to keep jobs in Washington state, we need investments that make us globally competitive,” said Port of Seattle Commissioner Bill Bryant. “That’s why we’re rebuilding T5. We’re investing in jobs. Modernizing T5 so it can handle the new big ships is the first step in realigning our port for the future.”
“As we are working to preserve maritime jobs in Seattle, the Commission is moving forward to strengthen cooperation with the Port of Tacoma to increase trade in Puget Sound,” said Port of Seattle Commissioner John Creighton. “We’re having productive talks on how we can make the Puget Sound gateway more competitive and create new jobs.”
“ILWU Local 19 appreciates the work the Port of Seattle and terminal operators are doing to keep cargo here in Seattle by making each of our terminals big ship ready,” said ILWU Local 19 President Cam Williams. “By preparing for the future, we insure that jobs will stay in the region.”
Shipping lines are consolidating into new alliances, and have been launching much bigger ships as part of their strategy to reduce costs. While three of the port’s container terminals are already home to Super Post-Panamax cranes that service 10,000 TEU vessels and above, the existing cranes at Terminal 5 are not able to handle these bigger ships.
Under the proposal, EMS would shift its operations to Terminal 18, allowing EMS to preserve container volume and ship calls. This commitment will preserve maritime jobs that depend on cargo flowing today through T5. Cargo destined to T5, under this proposal, would begin transitioning to T18 in mid-June. The proposal with EMS is tentative pending approval by the Port of Seattle Commission.
“T5 needs to be modernized for the bigger ships that are already here, we applaud the Port in working with us to preserve our customers’ cargo through this gateway,” said Nathaniel Seeds, COO of Eagle Marine Services, Ltd.
Maintaining efficient cargo throughput is essential for moving goods in and out of the port. With four in ten jobs in Washington dependent on trade, these terminal improvements will insure that Washington goods can get out of the Port of Seattle and into markets world-wide.
“Preserving vessel service capacity is good for exporters, we appreciate the Port of Seattle’s efforts to keep this gateway competitive,” said Anderson Hay CEO & President Mark Anderson.
The Port has also received approval from the federal government to let the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers begin studying the potential for a project that may result in the deepening of the West Waterway channel near the terminal.
Kit Case |
“If we’re going to keep jobs in Washington state, we need investments that make us globally competitive,” said Port of Seattle Commissioner Bill Bryant. “That’s why we’re rebuilding T5. We’re investing in jobs. Modernizing T5 so it can handle the new big ships is the first step in realigning our port for the future.”
“As we are working to preserve maritime jobs in Seattle, the Commission is moving forward to strengthen cooperation with the Port of Tacoma to increase trade in Puget Sound,” said Port of Seattle Commissioner John Creighton. “We’re having productive talks on how we can make the Puget Sound gateway more competitive and create new jobs.”
“ILWU Local 19 appreciates the work the Port of Seattle and terminal operators are doing to keep cargo here in Seattle by making each of our terminals big ship ready,” said ILWU Local 19 President Cam Williams. “By preparing for the future, we insure that jobs will stay in the region.”
Shipping lines are consolidating into new alliances, and have been launching much bigger ships as part of their strategy to reduce costs. While three of the port’s container terminals are already home to Super Post-Panamax cranes that service 10,000 TEU vessels and above, the existing cranes at Terminal 5 are not able to handle these bigger ships.
Under the proposal, EMS would shift its operations to Terminal 18, allowing EMS to preserve container volume and ship calls. This commitment will preserve maritime jobs that depend on cargo flowing today through T5. Cargo destined to T5, under this proposal, would begin transitioning to T18 in mid-June. The proposal with EMS is tentative pending approval by the Port of Seattle Commission.
“T5 needs to be modernized for the bigger ships that are already here, we applaud the Port in working with us to preserve our customers’ cargo through this gateway,” said Nathaniel Seeds, COO of Eagle Marine Services, Ltd.
Maintaining efficient cargo throughput is essential for moving goods in and out of the port. With four in ten jobs in Washington dependent on trade, these terminal improvements will insure that Washington goods can get out of the Port of Seattle and into markets world-wide.
“Preserving vessel service capacity is good for exporters, we appreciate the Port of Seattle’s efforts to keep this gateway competitive,” said Anderson Hay CEO & President Mark Anderson.
The Port has also received approval from the federal government to let the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers begin studying the potential for a project that may result in the deepening of the West Waterway channel near the terminal.
Related articles
- Is Shipping Oil by Rail As Dangerous As the Keystone Pipeline? (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Ship Breaking - Unsafe Working Conditions on the Beaches of Bangladesh (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Employee Rights Hurt by Supreme Court Decisions (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- OSHA Fines Norfolk Southern Railway $800,000 for Terminating Injured Workers (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Truckers Face Roadblocks for FMLA (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Employee Rights Hurt by Supreme Court Decisions (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
Thursday, July 17, 2014
National Prevention Council Annual Status Reports
Every year, the Council submits a report describing national progress in meeting specific prevention, health promotion, and public health goals defined in the National Prevention Strategy to the President and the relevant committees of Congress.National Prevention Council’s 2014 Annual Status ReportThe National Prevention Council’s 2014 Annual Status Report illustrates how Council departments are working across the federal government to incorporate health in diverse sectors like housing, transportation, and education to advance the Strategy and influence the health of individuals, families, and communities. In addition, the report highlights how partners across the country are advancing the National Prevention Strategy in organizations ranging from health care systems to workforce agencies and national foundations to local non-profits.Read the National Prevention Council 2014 Annual Status Report (PDF - 4.8 MB) The above file is currently undergoing remediation for compliance with Section 508. The remediation will be complete by July 31, 2014. In the interim, should you need accessibility assistance with the file, please contact the Office of the Surgeon General at Surgeon.General@hhs.gov. Previous Annual Status ReportsRead the National Prevention Council 2012 Annual Status Report (PDF - 490 KB)Read the National Prevention Council 2011 Annual... |
Related articles
- Federal Government Launches New Workplace Health Program (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- US Surgeon General Alerts Americans to the Hazards of Asbestos Disease (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Administration Urges Rate Changes for US FELA Benefits (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Wisconsin and Workers' Comp "Reform" (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- 1st International Symposium to Advance TOTAL WORKER HEALTH™ (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- NIOSH Issues "Roadmap" Document Suggesting Asbestos Research Strategy (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
Thursday, February 6, 2014
No Judges, No Justice
The LHWCA covers claims for longshoremen and shipbuilding and repair workers. |
Some months ago, I reported about a slowdown in the processing of claims under the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act and allied statutes. The LHWCA was enacted in 1927, and through amendments over the years has been broadened to include injury and disease claims for longshoremen and shipbuilding and repair workers. Expansion of the program in 1941 resulted in the Defense Base Act, covering employees of military contractors working abroad. With our ten-year presence in Afghanistan and Iraq, a large cohort of injured workers has fallen under the DBA in recent years.
Underfunding of ALJ positions within the Department of Labor routinely results in long delays for the hearing and decision making in claims, often meaning claimants are without any coverage for years.In another segment of its Breathless and Burdened report (subsequent to the one I recently posted about, concerning how black lung victims are routinely having their claims denied as a result of coal company-sponsored evaluations at Johns Hopkins), the Center for Public integrity has now reported on the extreme reduction of the number of administrative law judges within the US Department of Labor who hear and decide claims under the LHWCA and DBA. The center reports that the number of ALJ’s, nationwide, it has fallen to 35, from 41 earlier in 2013 and 53 a decade ago. This has occurred in the context of a 68% rise of new cases before the office of administrative law judges, and 134% increase in pending cases.
Underfunding of ALJ positions within the Department of Labor routinely results in long delays for the hearing and decision making in claims, often meaning claimants are without any coverage for years. Longshore and military contractor employers and their insurance companies, knowing that the adjudicative process in contested claims has become ridiculously long, are emboldened to sit on monies that are clearly owed to injured workers. In addition to the injustice to entitled injured workers resulting from this administrative chaos, to the extent that an injured workers medical benefits and indemnity payments are pushed to other systems, such as Medicare, Social Security, and state disability systems, the costs of the Longshore system are shifted to the federal tax payer and away from the employers and their carriers who should appropriately bear the burden.
Read about the specifics of particular cases in the Center’s report here.
Photo credit: Markus Brinkmann / Foter.com / CC BY-SA
Related articles
- Sequester Whacks Injured Workers (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- How Corporate Money Poisons "Independent" Medical Evaluations (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Does the Media Comprehend the Tragedy of Mass Worker Death? (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- The High Price of Gas - Mileage Reimbursement for Injured Workers (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- In Detroit Ruling, Threats to Promises and Assumptions (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Klickitat County Lumber Company Fined (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Substantial Credible Evidence Remains the Rule (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- The High Price of Gas - Mileage Reimbursement for Injured Workers (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
Sunday, January 12, 2014
OSHA will hold live Web chat on its proposed silica rule
The U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration will host a live Web chat to discuss the agency's proposed rule on occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica from 1 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. EST, Tuesday, Jan. 14. Visit http://www.osha.gov/silica/webchat.html to participate.
The Web chat will provide participants the opportunity to ask questions, get clarification from OSHA on the proposed silica rule and learn how to participate in the regulatory process. OSHA staff will be available to clarify the proposed standards related to silica for general industry, maritime and construction. Staff will also answer questions on OSHA's underlying analysis of health risks, potential costs and benefits, and economic impacts associated with the proposed rule and how to submit comments to the rulemaking record.
The deadline to submit written comments and testimony on the proposal is Monday, Jan. 27. Members of the public may submit comments by visiting http://www.regulations.gov.
Additional information on the proposed rule can be found at http://www.osha.gov/silica.
Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, employers are responsible for providing safe and healthful workplaces for their employees. OSHA's role is to ensure these conditions for America's working men and women by setting and enforcing standards, and providing training, education and assistance. For more information, visit www.osha.gov.
The Web chat will provide participants the opportunity to ask questions, get clarification from OSHA on the proposed silica rule and learn how to participate in the regulatory process. OSHA staff will be available to clarify the proposed standards related to silica for general industry, maritime and construction. Staff will also answer questions on OSHA's underlying analysis of health risks, potential costs and benefits, and economic impacts associated with the proposed rule and how to submit comments to the rulemaking record.
The deadline to submit written comments and testimony on the proposal is Monday, Jan. 27. Members of the public may submit comments by visiting http://www.regulations.gov.
Additional information on the proposed rule can be found at http://www.osha.gov/silica.
Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, employers are responsible for providing safe and healthful workplaces for their employees. OSHA's role is to ensure these conditions for America's working men and women by setting and enforcing standards, and providing training, education and assistance. For more information, visit www.osha.gov.
Related articles
- Silica exposures in fracking : Over 60 percent of workers may be excessively exposed
- Fear of Reporting Safety Claims
- Court Holds OSHA HazCom Standard Not A Bar To State Failure to Warn Claims
- OSHA proposes more than $460,000 in fines against Long Island, NY, contractor for repeat fall and scaffolding hazards
- Black Friday: OSHA Issues Safety Warning to Employers
- How Safe Is Healthcare for Workers?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)