While denying the asbestos personal injury claimants from seeking recovery, the Court allowed Chubb to proceed with its claim.
"We further hold that Chubb was not adequately represented in the proceedings that lead to the bankruptcy court's approval of the 1984 Insurance Settlement Agreement and the Manville Plan, and that it did not receive adequate notice of the 1986 Orders. Accordingly, both the bankruptcy court and the district court erred by rejecting Chubb's due process argument. Chubb is therefore not bound by the terms of the 1986 Orders. Consequently, it may attack the Orders collaterally as jurisdictionally void. And, as we held in Manville III, that attack is meritorious."
In re Johns-Manville Corp., --- F.3d ----, 2010 WL 1007832, C.A.2 (N.Y.),2010., March 22, 2010