Air and water problems mainly make headlines these days when extraordinary pulses of pollution surge in places like Beijing and Shanghai. But there are still enormous, if largely hidden, health and environmental costs in many parts of the United States that have failed to meet the goals set decades ago under the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act (e.g., see Muller, Mendelsohn, Nordhaus, 2011). Sometimes the issue is visible. I visited Houston briefly this week and snapped the photo above on the airport approach. Not pretty. Read on for excerpts from two relevant articles. The first, from the Allegheny Front, explores how lessons learned in trying to cut pollution from natural gas facilities in Houston can be applied in Pennsylvania’s fracking zone. The second, by my Pace University colleague and longtime water analyst John Cronin, digs in on the gap between Environmental Protection Agency statements on water pollution and the results in America’s waterways. Here’s “Houston Air Pollution: Preview for Pennsylvania?” It’s the second article in a planned four-part series, “The Coming Chemical Boom,” that was in part paid for by the Fund for Investigative Journalism. ... |
Copyright
(c) 2010-2025 Jon L Gelman, All Rights Reserved.
Showing posts with label Clean Air Act. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Clean Air Act. Show all posts
Tuesday, October 29, 2013
Updates on America's Persistent Air and Water Pollution Challenges
Friday, October 25, 2013
EPA Hits The Road To Seek Input On New Rules
The Environmental Protection Agency on Wednesday kicks off an 11-city "listening tour" as part of its effort to craft emissions rules for existing power plants. The tour starts in New York and Atlanta. Meetings will then be held from Boston to Seattle, wrapping up on Nov. 8. The agency is expected to solicit ideas on how best to regulate carbon emissions from the more than 1,000 power plants now in operation - the cornerstone and arguably the most controversial part of the Obama administration's strategy to address climate change. The EPA will use a rarely employed section of the federal Clean Air Act, known as section 111(d), and will rely heavily on input from states to craft a flexible rule that can be applied to states with different energy profiles. President Barack Obama set a June 2014 deadline for the agency to propose its rules, which need to be finalized in June 2015. Officials from some of the nine northeastern states in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) - a carbon trading program targeting power sector emissions - will attend some of the sessions and make the case that the initiative has a "plug and play" option for states to meet future federal... |
Related articles
- EPA Obtains Warrant to Address Over 1000 Drums and Containers at New Jersey Facility; Ongoing Investigation Reveals Presence of Hazardous Materials (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- EPA Finalizes Cleanup Plan for Gowanus Canal Superfund Site in Brooklyn, New York; $506 Million Cleanup Will Remove Contaminated Sediment and Create Jobs (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- EPA Web Tool Expands Access to Scientific, Regulatory Information on Chemicals (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- What Happens When The Government Shuts Down 94 Percent of the EPA (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- EPA Announces the start of Sampling Activities at the CTS of Ashville, Inc. Superfund Site in Ashville,North Carolina (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Exxon Mobil subsidiary charged for wastewater spill in Pennsylvania (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
Saturday, July 21, 2012
Welcome, sulfur dioxide...not
Hello, carbon monoxide
The air, the air
Is everywhere
HAIR, The Broadway Musical
A Federal Court of Appeals ruled against several states and state regulatory agencies, together with corporations and industrial associations, who petitioned for review of the Environmental Protection Agency’s rule entitled “Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Sulfur Dioxide,” and of the subsequent denial of their petitions for reconsideration of the standard.
The petitioners contended, first, that EPA failed to follow notice-and-comment rulemaking [ 75 Fed. Reg. 35520 ] procedures, and second, that the agency arbitrarily set the maximum sulfur dioxide (SO2) concentration at a level lower than statutorily authorized. National Environmental Development v. EPA, No. 10-1252, (Cir Ct App DC) Decided July 20, 2012
Related articles
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)