It’s no coincidence that there’s been an outpouring of research on wage trends of late, just in time for the annual meeting of the world’s central bankers at Jackson Hole, Wyo. But one noted monetary expert who should but won’t be there is Elsa, the ice queen from “Frozen,” whose policy of “Let it Go” is critically important when it comes to allowing for non-inflationary wage growth (so perhaps “let ‘em grow” is a bit more precise). This new spate of analysis, which I’ll describe in a moment, generates two important findings. First, considerable lingering labor market slack is still a drag on wage growth. Second, the linkages between wage growth and price inflation are not very tight at all. Both findings should lead those poised to snuff out wage growth — in the case of the Fed, by raising interest rates — to stand down. A key challenge for the Fed in recent years has been figuring out just how tight or slack the job market is, a question that’s been harder than usual because the unemployment rate isn’t as revealing a signal as usual. The reasons for the weaker signal are weak labor force participation and unprecedented shares of long-term unemployment, both of which dampen the jobless rate’s traditional dominance as a measure of labor market tautness. Simply put, the job market... |
Copyright
(c) 2010-2024 Jon L Gelman, All Rights Reserved.
Showing posts with label The Washington Post. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Washington Post. Show all posts
Sunday, August 24, 2014
This is why wages have risen so slowly. (But the Fed can help!)
Friday, January 3, 2014
Unemployment benefits, the cruelest cut of all
To 1.3 million jobless Americans: The Republican Party wishes you a Very Unhappy New Year!
It would be one thing if there were a logical reason to cut off unemployment benefits for those who have been out of work the longest. But no such rationale exists. On both economic and moral grounds, extending benefits for the long-term unemployed should have received an automatic, bipartisan vote in both houses of Congress. The result is a cruel blow to families that are already suffering. On Saturday, benefits were allowed to expire for 1.3 million people who have been unemployed more than six months. These are precisely the jobless who will suffer most from a cutoff, since they have been scraping by on unemployment checks for so long that their financial situations are already precarious, if not dire. Extending unemployment benefits is something that’s normally done in a recession, and Republicans correctly point out that we are now in a recovery. But there was nothing normal about the Great Recession, and there is nothing normal about the Not-So-Great Recovery. We are emerging from the worst economic slump since the Depression, and growth has been unusually — and painfully — slow. Only... |
Related articles
- Charts: The Worst Long-Term Unemployment Crisis Since the Depression (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Extension of Benefits for Jobless Is Set to End (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Knasas, The Next Target: Unions expect difficult legislative session in 2014 (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- The Appalling Stance of Rand Paul (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- NEOC Awards Whistleblower Client Misclassified as Independent Contractor (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Aid Programs Helped U.S. Survive the Great Recession (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- 10 Reasons That Long-Term Unemployment Is a National Catastrophe (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)