Copyright

(c) 2010-2024 Jon L Gelman, All Rights Reserved.
Showing posts with label The Washington Post. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Washington Post. Show all posts

Sunday, August 24, 2014

This is why wages have risen so slowly. (But the Fed can help!)

Today's post was shared by Steven Greenhouse and comes from www.washingtonpost.com

It’s no coincidence that there’s been an outpouring of research on wage trends of late, just in time for the annual meeting of the world’s central bankers at Jackson Hole, Wyo. But one noted monetary expert who should but won’t be there is Elsa, the ice queen from “Frozen,” whose policy of “Let it Go” is critically important when it comes to allowing for non-inflationary wage growth (so perhaps “let ‘em grow” is a bit more precise).
This new spate of analysis, which I’ll describe in a moment, generates two important findings. First, considerable lingering labor market slack is still a drag on wage growth. Second, the linkages between wage growth and price inflation are not very tight at all. Both findings should lead those poised to snuff out wage growth — in the case of the Fed, by raising interest rates — to stand down.
A key challenge for the Fed in recent years has been figuring out just how tight or slack the job market is, a question that’s been harder than usual because the unemployment rate isn’t as revealing a signal as usual. The reasons for the weaker signal are weak labor force participation and unprecedented shares of long-term unemployment, both of which dampen the jobless rate’s traditional dominance as a measure of labor market tautness. Simply put, the job market...
[Click here to see the rest of this post]

Friday, January 3, 2014

Unemployment benefits, the cruelest cut of all

Today's post was shared by Steven Greenhouse and comes from www.washingtonpost.com

To 1.3 million jobless Americans: The Republican Party wishes you a Very Unhappy New Year!
It would be one thing if there were a logical reason to cut off unemployment benefits for those who have been out of work the longest. But no such rationale exists. On both economic and moral grounds, extending benefits for the long-term unemployed should have received an automatic, bipartisan vote in both houses of Congress.
It didn’t. Nothing is automatic and bipartisan anymore, not with today’s radicalized GOP on the scene. In this case, a sensible and humane policy option is hostage to bruised Republican egos and the ideological myth of “makers” vs. “takers.”
The result is a cruel blow to families that are already suffering. On Saturday, benefits were allowed to expire for 1.3 million people who have been unemployed more than six months. These are precisely the jobless who will suffer most from a cutoff, since they have been scraping by on unemployment checks for so long that their financial situations are already precarious, if not dire.
Extending unemployment benefits is something that’s normally done in a recession, and Republicans correctly point out that we are now in a recovery. But there was nothing normal about the Great Recession, and there is nothing normal about the Not-So-Great Recovery.
We are emerging from the worst economic slump since the Depression, and growth has been unusually — and painfully — slow. Only...
[Click here to see the rest of this post]