Copyright

(c) 2010-2024 Jon L Gelman, All Rights Reserved.

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

Facebook Makes an Appearance in Workers' Compensation Court

Social networking sites, such as Facebook, have now become informational sources that workers' compensation lawyers are now utilizing for evidentiary purposes. The question that remains unanswered is how information obtained through social networking sites can be admitted and utilized as evidence.

In a recently published article, Law School Professor Gregory M. Duhl and attorney Jaclyn S. Millner, focus on the issues of professional responsibility, discovery, privacy and evidence when social networking factors integrate with a workers's compensation proceeding. Since the compensation system is theoretically no-fault and the evidentiary system is informal, the authors theorize that the workers' compensation arena will act as a fertile ground for experimentation in the legal application of this new technology. 

Social networking site have experienced a surge in use. Web users spend more time on Facebook now than on Google.  Workers' Compensation judges are  also increasing their use of social networking sites.

Text, photos and commentary, shared among the social network, will provide a new avenue of factual discovery that may assist the decision maker in reaching an evaluation of the claim. The authors review the professional responsibilities of attorneys to their clients in advising them of the potential benefits and hazards of social networking, as well as  their  strategy for preparing text and photographic material into evidence. They conclude that lawyers handling workers' compensation matters need to be educated on how to properly utilize facts and opinions gathered from the social networking system.

Duhl, Gregory M. and Millner, Jaclyn S., Social Networking and Workers’ Compensation Law at the Crossroads (September 2010). Pace Law Review, Vol. 31; William Mitchell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2010-16. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1675026
...
For over 3 decades the Law Offices of Jon L. Gelman 1.973.696.7900
 jon@gelmans.com have been representing injured workers and their families who have suffered occupational illnesses. Author NJ Workers Compensation Law (West).

Related Articles:

Saturday, September 11, 2010

Fraud Unit DA in California Admits to Knowing Zero About Employee Rights


"I don't really know about what employees' rights are when it comes to workers' comp," he said.  "I know what fraud is, I can talk about that all day long.  But in terms of what their rights are, I will admit to Yolo County I am neglectful of that."


Lt. Stroski continues,  "So if anyone wants to help me out with that I would be glad to take that advice and run with it and include it in our outreach program. Bottom line is I have been remiss in doing that because I don't feel I'm qualified.  If you are going to ask me that, the answer is zero, I don't feel qualified."


Complete Article:  http://tinyurl.com/28avsla


For over 3 decades the Law Offices of Jon L. Gelman 1.973.696.7900 jon@gelmans.com have been representing injured workers and their families who have suffered occupational illnesses. Author NJ Workers Compensation Law (West).

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

NJ Workers Compensation Payments to Decrease

For the first time in history, the NJ workers compensation benefit rates are going to decrease. The maximum benefit rate will decrease 0.3% from $794.00 to $792.00 per week.


The 2011 maximum workers' compensation benefit rates for temporary disability, permanent total disability, permanent partial disability and the dependency rate are based upon the States's Average Weekly Wage (SAWW) for the year prior. New Jersey currently provides for a maximum benefit of 75% of the statewide average weekly wage (SAWW). 


The New Jersey maximum rate has been considered significantly low when compared to to other states and perennially a higher adjustment has been recommended.  

The rate applies to those work related injuries and deaths that occur in 2011. NJ ADC 12)2351.6, 42 N.J.R. 1994 (a). In 2007 the rate rose a modest 2.7 %.

Historically, NJ maximum workers' compensation has only risen yearly over the decades. The 2011 announced decrease represents a major slow down in the State's economy. Despite the announced fall in scheduled disability rates, the cost of soaring medical treatment remains uncapped and its economic impact remains uncertain in an era of declining payrolls and lower premium collections for compensation benefits.
Related Articles:
For over 3 decades the Law Offices of Jon L. Gelman 1.973.696.7900 jjon@gelmans.com have been representing injured workers and their families who have suffered occupational illnesses. Author NJ Workers Compensation Law (West).

Monday, September 6, 2010

$30.4 Million Verdict in Popcorn Flavoring Lawsuit

A jury in the Chicago area awarded a local factory worker $30.4 Million for a pulmonary illness resulting from exposure to popcorn flavoring,  diacetyl. The verdict is considered to be largest ever in the US for an individual claim involving a chemical used to flavor popcorn.

Click here to read the Chicago Tribune article

For over 3 decades the Law Offices of Jon L. Gelman 1.973.696.7900 jon@gelmans.com have been representing injured workers and their families who have suffered occupational illnesses. The read more about diacetyl and workers' compensation click here.


Sunday, September 5, 2010

The Fatal Consequences of the GM Bankruptcy

Logo of General Motors Corporation. Source: 20...Image via Wikipedia
The General Motors (GM) bankruptcy is going to adversely impact workers' compensation. It has been estimated that GM is facing  $500 Million worth of future mesothelioma claims that its bankruptcy estate is going to avoid paying. The claims will arise because  deadly asbestos fiber that was used in in the manufacture of GM products including brakes.

Last month U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Robert Gerber in New York permitted the unsecured creditors (asbestos claimants) to obtain documentation from GM about the number of estimated / asbestos liability claims it could be facing in the future. As a result of the bankruptcy action, GM transfered its assets only to
Motors Liquidation Co., but it plans not to transfer its asbestos liabilities to the new company. Therefore, future asbestos claims against GM will not be paid.

Brakes linings were raw asbestos. GM brakes were sold to and used by auto-mechanics for decades.  
Asbestos is a known carcinogen and its deadly effects have been recognized since the early 20th century. One of the latent diseases caused by asbestos exposure is mesothelioma, a rare and fatal illness.

Workers' Compensation systems throughout the United States have been literally swamped with asbestos related claims as the workforce aged and the disease has manifested. The workers' compensation insurance carriers and past employers who used asbestos products have sought to be reimbursed for benefits paid to injured workers by the ultimate wrongdoers, the suppliers, manufacturers and distributors of asbestos products. Those wrongdoers failed to place warning of its products concerning the hazards of asbestos fiber and knew of the hazards.


Taking away the right of ill employees to seek benenfits from GM for its alleged wrongful acts will severely impact the workers' compensation system throughout the US, especially if this process of avoidance becomes of model for future asbestos bankruptcy actions. Difficulties navigating the workers compensation systems at present for occupational illness benefits have become burdensome and extremely difficult for injured workers and their families. GM's attempt to absolve itself from financial responsibility for asbestos related disease should not be permitted as it may create a fatal economic attack on the ailing compensation system.

For over 3 decades the Law Offices of Jon L. Gelman 1.973.696.7900 jon@gelmans.com have been representing injured workers and their families who have suffered asbestos related disease.

Saturday, September 4, 2010

CMS/MSP Statute Tolling Case Set for Hearing by Federal Court

The claim filed by the US government for reimbursement against multiple law firms and insurance companies has been scheduled for a hearing September 13, 2010 on the pending motions. The Federal government, who has claimed that the Statute of Limitation was tolled, is seeking reimbursement involving over 900 specific claims that were paid involving a liability action. The gross settlement was $275 Million for which payment was made in 2003.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicad Services (CMS) under the Medicare Secondary Payer Act has alleged that it was not reimbursed. The Government contends that the Statute of Limitations under 28 U.S.C.2415 is 6 years and not three years. Alternatively the Government has argued that the Statute  f Limitations was tolled under 28 U.S,C, 2416(c), which permits tolling where a claim has accrued, but "facts material to the right of action are not known and reasonably could not be known" by the Government.

The attorneys and insurance companies contend that the Statute of Limitations is a valid defense since the the claim arose when the defendants were originally obligated under the settlement agreement to make payment. Travelers and AIG, as parent companies,  claim that they are not proper parties to the case and should be removed as parties. The insurance companies, in a brief filed in June 2003, also allege that the bar to permitted the statute of limitation tolling should have been dropped under Federal statute. The stated in  "....once the facts making up the 'very essence of the right of action' are reasonably knowable."

United States of America v. James J. Stricker, et al., Case No. 1:09-cv-02423-KOB (USDCT AL).

Related Articles:
Amended Complaint Filed in CMS Recovery Action Against Law Firms

For over 3 decades the Law Offices of Jon L. Gelman 1.973.696.7900 jon@gelmans.com have been representing injured workers and their families who have suffered occupational exposures.

Thursday, September 2, 2010

Spinal Kinetics-A New Computer Assisted Radiographic Mensuration Analysis

A new approached to the objective measurement of spinal damage is now being offered by Spinal Kinetics. The technique provides standards for the measurement for spinal ligamentous assessments using Computer Assisted Radiographic Analysis (CRMA). Board Certified Radiologists utilize a new computer assisted program to  determine: a treatment plan, ability to play and work, as well a pain management.


Click here to read more about this Spinal Kinetics
..........
For over 3 decades the Law Offices of Jon L. Gelman 1.973.696.7900 jon@gelmans.com have been representing injured workers and their families who have suffered occupational exposures.