The workers’ compensation system nationally has been challenged over the last two plus years of the COVID Pandemic. The multi-state administered workers’ compensation program is based on a litigious patchwork of state programs with varying degrees of eligibility, procedures, and benefits.
Occupational disease claims [ODC], such as infectious disease cases, have generally been problematic for the workers’ compensation system in proof and defense. They are usually costly to litigate and monumental in risk exposure.
Occupational disease claims as an added component to the statutory policy provisions of workers’ compensation and have been evolving throughout the decades. The crafters of the original compensation acts in the US in 1911 did not incorporate ODC claims into the program. They were added in the 1950s when employers wanted to shelter themselves from large verdicts in civil actions anticipated from silica exposures. ODC claims resulted in an unanticipated wave of asbestos disease claims in the 1970s.
Those who advocate for a Federalized program for the delivery of medical benefits observe that varying statutory eligibility requirements for compensability of infectious disease claims result in litigation delays and denial of urgent care.
Those encouraging changes look to a recent study that estimated a single-payer universal healthcare system would have saved 212,000 lives in 2020 alone during the COVID-19 Pandemic. The report calculated that a Medicare-for-All system could have prevented US $105.6 billion of medical expenses associated with COVID-19 hospitalization.
The phases of the SAR-CoV-2 illustrate the need for rapid delivery of care at the onset of the infection was necessary to contain the “Cytokine storm.” Many SAR-CoV-2 system complications may be caused by a condition known as cytokine release syndrome or a cytokine storm. An infection triggers your immune system to flood your bloodstream with inflammatory proteins called cytokines. Additional complications could result in secondary and sometimes fatal reactions and Long COVID / Post Acute COVID Sequelae [PASC].
Advocates of a Medicare-for-All [MFA] system state that the United States should follow the path already taken by European countries, whose workers’ compensation systems pre-dated those of the US. It would provide immediate medical benefits to workers without the need for litigation and the associated administrative costs. Also, the potentially catastrophic results in endless and unpredictable waves of disease would not strain the state workers’ compensation programs.
A MFA program has support from both the far right and left of the major US political parties. Time will tell if the current and future consequences of the SAR-CoV-2 pandemic will generate the necessary momentum to cause infectious disease claims to be incorporated into a MFA program.
Recommended Citation: Gelman, Jon L., Is Medicare-For-All a Prescription for Infectious Diseases in the Workplace?, Workers' Compensation Blog, June 20, 2022), https://workers-compensation.blogspot.com/2022/06/is-medicare-for-all-prescription-for.html
Jon L. Gelman of Wayne, NJ, is the author of NJ Workers’ Compensation Law (Thomson-Reuters) and co-author of the national treatise, Modern Workers’ Compensation Law (Thomson-Reuters). For over five decades, the Law Offices of Jon L Gelman 1.973.696.7900 firstname.lastname@example.org have represented injured workers and their families who have suffered occupational accidents and illnesses.
Blog: Workers ' Compensation
LinkedIn Group: Injured Workers Law & Advocacy Group
Author: "Workers' Compensation Law" Thomson-Reuters