The car crash that killed Gene Erickson caught the attention of federal regulators. Why did the Saturn Ion he was traveling in, along a rural Texas road, suddenly swerve into a tree? Why did the air bags fail? General Motors told federal authorities that it could not provide answers. But only a month earlier, a G.M. engineer had concluded in an internal evaluation that the Ion had most likely lost power, disabling its air bags, according to a subsequent internal investigation commissioned by G.M. Now, G.M.'s response, as well as its replies to queries in other crashes obtained by The New York Times from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, casts doubt on how forthright the automaker was with regulators over a defective ignition switch that G.M. has linked to at least 13 deaths over the last decade. They provide details for the first time on the issue at the heart of a criminal investigation by the Justice Department: whether G.M., in its interaction with safety regulators, obscured a deadly defect that would also injure perhaps hundreds of people. The company repeatedly found a way not to answer the simple question from regulators of what led to a crash. In at least three cases of fatal crashes, including the accident that killed Mr. Erickson, G.M. said that it had not assessed the cause. In another fatal crash, G.M. said that attorney-client privilege may have prevented it from answering. And in other cases, the automaker was more blunt, writing, “G.M.... |
Copyright
(c) 2010-2024 Jon L Gelman, All Rights Reserved.
Showing posts with label United States Department of Justice. Show all posts
Showing posts with label United States Department of Justice. Show all posts
Friday, July 18, 2014
Documents Show General Motors Kept Silent on Fatal Crashes
Thursday, January 16, 2014
Deal reached on tobacco firm corrective statements
RICHMOND — The nation’s tobacco companies and the federal government have reached an agreement on publishing corrective statements that say the companies lied about the dangers of smoking and requires them to disclose smoking’s health effects, including the death on average of 1,200 people a day.
The agreement, filed Friday in U.S. District Court in Washington, follows a 2012 ruling ordering the industry to pay for corrective statements in various advertisements. The judge in the case ordered the parties to meet to discuss how to implement the statements, including whether they would be put in inserts with cigarette packs and on Web sites, TV and newspaper ads. The court must approve the agreement, and the parties are discussing whether retailers will be required to post large displays with the industry’s admissions. The corrective statements are part of a case that the government brought in 1999 under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. U.S. District Judge Gladys Kessler ruled in that case in 2006 that the nation’s largest cigarette makers concealed the dangers of smoking for decades. The companies involved in the case include Richmond-based Altria Group, owner of the biggest U.S. tobacco company, Philip Morris USA; No. 2 cigarette maker, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco, owned by Winston-Salem, N.C.-based Reynolds American; and No. 3 cigarette maker Lorillard, based in Greensboro, N.C. Under the agreement with the Justice Department,... |
Related articles
Wednesday, October 30, 2013
Stryker Corp. Settles FCPA Case, Pays $13 Million
Stryker Corp. settled a long-running U.S. foreign bribery case, agreeing on Thursday to pay $13.3 million to the Securities and Exchange Commission to resolve the allegations — without admitting or denying them.
The Kalamazoo, Mich.-based medical device company first disclosed in 2007 that the SEC and the U.S. Justice Department had made inquiries regarding possible violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which bars the use of bribes to foreign officials to get or keep business. An SEC investigation found that Stryker’s subsidiaries in Argentina, Greece, Mexico, Poland and Romania made about $2.2 million in illicit payments, describing them in company books as legitimate expenses such as charitable donations, service contracts, travel expenses and commissions. The company made about $7.5 million in profit as a result of the payments, the SEC said. “Stryker’s misconduct involved hundreds of improper payments over a number of years during which the company’s internal controls were fatally flawed,” said Andrew Calamari, director of the SEC’s New York office, in a statement. Joe Cooper, the director of communications for Stryker, said in an email the company has enhanced its company-wide anti-corruption compliance program, and was advised that the Justice Department closed its investigation. A Justice Department spokesman declined to comment. The SEC issued an administrative order (pdf) against Stryker requiring the company to pay... |
Related articles
- Senior Care Workers Are Victims of Wage Violations (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Exxon Mobil subsidiary charged for wastewater spill in Pennsylvania (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Work Comp Steps Up to ACA (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Spinal fusions serve as case study for debate over when certain surgeries are necessary (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Judge denies jury trial in Chevron RICO case (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Supreme Court Rejects Tobacco Companies' Appeal of Florida Case (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
Friday, March 2, 2012
BP and plaintiffs reach Gulf oil spill settlement
The Associated Press: BP, plaintiffs reach Gulf oil spill settlement: "BP PLC and a committee representing plaintiffs suing over the 2010 Gulf oil spill have reached an agreement, a federal judge said late Friday night. Specific terms have not been released."
Related articles
- Gulf oil spill trial delayed for settlement talks (newsok.com)
- BP's Gulf Oil Spill Trial Delayed One Week (thestreet.com)
- BP Said to Consider $14 Billion Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill Accord (businessweek.com)
Friday, January 13, 2012
Cold War Compensation Act - EEOICPA: US DOL Notifies Workers of 17 Facilities of Eligibility
US Department of Labor notifies workers of 17 facilities associated with Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act about potential eligibility under EEOICPA
The U.S. Department of Labor is notifying former workers of 17 facilities associated with the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act about compensation and medical benefits potentially available to them under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act, which is administered by the department's Division of Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation. Survivors of qualified workers also may be entitled to benefits.
Former employees may be eligible if they worked at any of the facilities during a period of covered U.S. Department of Energy-funded environmental remediation efforts. Additionally, three facilities already covered under the EEOICPA now have expanded periods of eligibility.
On Dec. 15, 2010, DEEOIC determined that the Uranium Mill at Shiprock, N.M., was a covered DOE facility for the purposes of the EEOICPA. Given that Uranium Mill at Shiprock was only one of the facilities associated with the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act, DEEOIC conducted a review considering whether additional facilities met the statutory definition of a covered DOE facility under the EEOICPA. Based on that review, DEEOIC determined that the above-mentioned facilities meet the definition.
On July 31, 2001, the Labor Department began administering Part B of the EEOICPA. Part B covers current and former workers who have been diagnosed with cancer, beryllium disease or silicosis, and whose illness was caused by exposure to radiation, beryllium or silica while working directly for DOE, that department's contractors or subcontractors, a designated Atomic Weapons Employer or a beryllium vendor. Part E, created by an amendment to the EEOICPA on Oct. 28, 2004, provides federal compensation and medical benefits to DOE contractors and subcontractors who worked at covered facilities and sustained an illness as a result of exposure to toxic substances.
The EEOICPA also provides additional compensation for uranium workers who worked at facilities covered by the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act, which is administered by the U.S. Department of Justice. To assist individuals regardless of where they live, the department has 11 stationary resource centers located throughout the country. These resource centers provide an initial point-of-contact for individuals interested in filing a claim under EEOICPA, and staff provide both in-person and telephone-based assistance. For additional information about how to file a claim under EEOICPA, call toll-free at 866-888-3322 or visit the DEEOIC's website at http://www.dol.gov/owcp/energy/.
Editor's note: A list of the 17 facilities and the periods of covered DOE-funded environmental remediation efforts follows this release. Facilities with an expanded eligibility period are indicated by an asterisk.
Facilities associated with the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act
- Uranium Mill in Monument Valley, Ariz., from May 1989 through February 1990 and September 1992 through May 1994
- Uranium Mill in Tuba City, Ariz., from January 1985 through February 1986 and January 1988 through April 1990
- Climax Uranium Mill in Grand Junction, Colo., from December 1988 through August 1994
- Uranium Mill in Gunnison, Colo., September 1991 through December 1995
- Uranium Mill in Maybell, Colo., from May 1995 through September 1998
- Uranium Mill in Naturita, Colo., May 1994 through November 1994 and June 1996 through September 1998
- New Uranium Mill in Rifle, Colo., September 1988 through September 1989 and April 1992 through October 1996
- Old Uranium Mill in Rifle, Colo., September 1988 through September 1989 and April 1992 through October 1996
- Uranium Mill No. 1 in Slick Rock (East), Colo., in 1995 and 1996
- Uranium Mill No. 2 in Slick Rock (West), Colo., in 1995 and 1996
- Uranium Mill in Lowman, Idaho, in 1992 and from 1994 to the present
- Uranium Mill in Ambrosia Lake, N.M., from July 1987 through April 1989 and October 1992 through July 1995
- Uranium Mill and Disposal Cell in Lakeview, Ore., from 1986 through 1989
- Uranium Mill in Falls City, Texas, from January 1992 through June 1994
- Uranium Mill in Mexican Hat, Utah, from July 1987 through October 1987 and September 1992 through February 1995
- Uranium Mill in Riverton, Wyo., from May 1988 through September 1990
- Uranium Mill in Converse County (Spook Site), Wyo., from April 1989 through September 1989
- *Uranium Mill in Durango, Colo., already covered for 1948 through 1953, now also is covered for October 1986 through May 1991
- *Vitro Manufacturing in Canonsburg, Pa., already covered as a beryllium vendor facility for 1948, and as an Atomic Weapons Employer facility for 1942 through 1959 (with residual radiation coverage for 1958 through 1985), now also is covered for 1983 through 1985 and for 1996
- *Uranium Mill in Monticello, Utah, already covered for 1948 through 1960, now also is covered for remediation performed by DOE and DOE contractors under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act for 1983 through 2000
*Additional years of qualifying employment have been added to these three facilities currently covered under the EEOICPA.
Related articles
- The Law School's Roll in Workers' Compensation Law To Be Discussed (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- US Labor Department's MSHA cites corporate culture as root cause of Upper Big Branch Mine disaster (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Hostess Fined $105,000 (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)