Workers' Compensation

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Truck Crash That Kills 11 Results in Call For A National Cellphone Ban

Citing distraction from the use of a mobile phone by the driver of an 18-wheel semi truck as the probable cause of a crash that killed 11 people, the National Transportation Safety Board recommended banning the use of mobile phones by commercial drivers except in emergencies. Accidents arising from the use of cell phone are resulting major liability & workers' compensation problems for employers.

"Distracted driving is becoming increasingly prevalent, exacerbating the danger we encounter daily on our roadways," said NTSB Chairman Deborah A.P. Hersman. "It can be especially lethal when the distracted driver is at the wheel of a vehicle that weighs 40 tons and travels at highway speeds."

On March 26, 2010, at about 5:14 a.m. CDT, near Munfordville, Kentucky, a truck-tractor semitrailer combination unit driven by a 45-year-old male departed the left lane of southbound Interstate 65, crossed a 60-foot-wide median, struck and overrode a cable barrier system, entered the northbound travel lanes, and struck a 15-passenger van, driven by a 41-year-old male and occupied by 11 passengers (eight adults, two small children, and an infant). The truck driver and 10 of the 12 occupants of the van were killed.

Investigators determined that the driver used his mobile phone for calls and text messages a total of 69 times while driving in the 24-hour period prior to the accident. The driver made four calls in the minutes leading up to the crash, making the last call at 5:14 a.m. CDT, coinciding with the time that the truck departed the highway.

The Safety Board also determined that the median barrier system, which had recently been installed following another cross-median fatal accident on the same section of I-65, contributed to the severity of the accident because it was not designed to redirect or contain a vehicle of the accident truck's size. Because median crossover accidents involving large vehicles are so deadly, the NTSB made recommendations regarding the use of appropriately designed median barriers on roadways with high volumes of commercial vehicles.

At the meeting today, the NTSB issued 15 new safety recommendations to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), the Governors Highway Safety Association (GHSA), all 50 states, and the District of Columbia. The Safety Board also reiterated two previously issued recommendations to the FMCSA.

A synopsis of the NTSB report, including the probable cause, findings, and a complete list of all the safety recommendations, is available on the NTSB's website. The NTSB's full report will be available on the website in several weeks.

RELATED MATERIAL

Board meeting announcement (9/8/11)

Investigative update (5/14/10)

Launch of investigative team to accident site (3/26/10)

The Top 10 Drugs Prescribed For Workers Compensation Claims

A recent study by NCCI Holdings, Inc. reports the top 10 most popular drugs prescribed for workers' compensation claims.

OXYCONTIN®
LIDODERM®
HYDROCODONE-ACETAMINOPHEN
LYRICA®
CELEBREX®
GABAPENTIN
SKELAXIN®
CYMBALTA®
MELOXICAM
CYCLOBENZAPRINE HCL

Workers compensation medical costs per claim average more than $6,000 and soar to nearly $25,000 for lost-time claims. The report examined workers compensation prescription drug (Rx) use, a medical expense that makes up 19% of all workers compensation (WC) medical costs.

Other key findings of the report were:

The indicated Rx share of total medical is 19%; this is slightly higher than the estimate given in the 2010 update
OxyContin® climbs from the number 3 WC drug in Service Year 2008 to number 1 in Service Year 2009
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen drops from the top WC drug in Service Year 2008 to number 3 in Service Year 2009
Recent overall cost increases are driven more by utilization increases than by price increases
Physician dispensing continues to increase in Service Year 2009 in almost every state
Increased physician dispensing is associated with increased drug costs per claim
Per-claim Rx costs vary significantly by state

For over 3 decades the Law Offices of Jon L. Gelman 1.973.696.7900 jon@gelmans.com have been representing injured workers and their families who have suffered occupational accidents and illnesses.

Tuesday, September 13, 2011

Acetone Explosion Results in $917,000 OSHA Fine for Bostik Inc.

US Labor Department’s OSHA cites 50 safety violations, proposes $917,000 in fines against Bostik Inc. following Middleton, Mass., explosion

The U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration has cited Bostik Inc. for 50 alleged violations of workplace safety standards following a March 13 explosion at the company's Middleton plant in which four workers were injured. The adhesives manufacturer faces a total of $917,000 in proposed fines.

OSHA's inspection identified several serious deficiencies in the company's process safety management program, a detailed set of requirements and procedures employers must follow to proactively address hazards associated with processes and equipment that involve large amounts of hazardous chemicals. In this case, the chemical was acetone, used in a PSM-covered process known as direct solvation. On the day of the explosion, a valve on a transfer line inadvertently was left open, resulting in the release of flammable acetone vapors. The vapors exploded after being ignited by an undetermined source.

"The requirements of OSHA's PSM standard are stringent and comprehensive because the stakes are so high," said Assistant Secretary of Labor for OSHA Dr. David Michaels. "Failure to evaluate, anticipate, address and prevent hazardous conditions associated with a process can result in a catastrophic incident such as an explosion."

"In this case, Bostik knew from prior third party and internal compliance audits conducted at the plant that aspects of its PSM program were incomplete or inadequate, and misclassified electrical equipment was in use. The company did not take adequate steps to address those conditions," said Jeffrey A. Erskine, OSHA's area director for northeastern Massachusetts. "Luckily, the explosion happened when there were few workers in the plant. Otherwise, this incident could have resulted in a catastrophic loss of life."

Specifically, OSHA found that the process safety information for the solvation process was incomplete. The employer's analysis of hazards related to the process did not address previous incidents with a potential for catastrophic results, such as forklifts that struck process equipment, and did not address human factors such as operator error, communication between shift changes and employee fatigue from excessive overtime. In addition, the company did not ensure that a forklift and electrical equipment, such as a light fixture, switches and a motor, were approved for use in Class 1 hazardous locations where flammable gases or vapors are present.

As a result, OSHA has issued Bostik nine willful citations, with $630,000 in proposed fines, for these conditions. A willful violation is one committed with intentional knowing or voluntary disregard for the law's requirements, or with plain indifference to worker safety and health.

Bostik Inc. also has been issued 41 serious citations, with $287,000 in fines, for a range of other conditions, including an incomplete and deficient emergency response plan, inadequate training for employees required to fight fires, obstructed exit access and electrical hazards, and additional PSM deficiencies. A serious violation occurs when there is substantial probability that death or serious physical harm could result from a hazard about which the employer knew or should have known.

The Bostik Inc. citations are available at http://www.osha.gov/ooc/citations/Bostik_Inc_315298281.pdf andhttp://www.osha.gov/ooc/citations/Bostik_Inc_315298307.pdf.

Detailed information on process safety management is available athttp://www.osha.gov/SLTC/processsafetymanagement/index.html and http://www.osha.gov/pls/publications/publication.athruz?pType=Industry&pID=166.

Bostik Inc. has 15 business days from receipt of its citations and proposed penalties to comply, meet with OSHA's area director or contest the findings before the independent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission. The investigation was conducted by OSHA's Andover Area Office; telephone 978-837-4460.

To report workplace incidents, fatalities or situations posing imminent danger to workers, call OSHA's toll-free hotline at 800-321-OSHA (6742).

Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, employers are responsible for providing safe and healthful workplaces for their employees. OSHA's role is to ensure these conditions for America's working men and women by setting and enforcing standards, and providing training, education and assistance. For more information, visit http://www.osha.gov.

Monday, September 12, 2011

Workers Compensation Do It Yourselfers Get Help

Workers Compensation claims can be complicated and difficult so some states offer assistance to those who want to handle their own cases. Minnesota is the latest in a series of jurisdictions to offer assistance to both injured workers and employers.

The Department of Labor and Industry (DLI) has established a new Office of Workers' Compensation Ombudsman to provide advice and assistance to employees and small businesses.

"Our goal is to help injured workers and small businesses who are having problems navigating the workers' compensation system," said Ken Peterson, DLI commissioner. "The ombudsman will complement the other services provided by our agency's Safety and Workers' Compensation Division and will be an additional resource for parties who need in-depth help in resolving problems they encounter in the workers' compensation system."

Various stakeholders have long sought an ombudsman function to help injured workers who are often at a disadvantage because they know very little about how the sometimes complex benefit entitlement system works in workers' compensation. In February 2009, after studying DLI's oversight of workers' compensation, the Minnesota Office of the Legislative Auditor issued a report that encouraged the establishment of an ombudsman function to "help those injured workers who are overwhelmed with the workers' compensation process."

The ombudsman assists injured workers by:

providing advice and information to help them protect their rights and to pursue a claim;
contacting claims adjusters and other parties to help resolve disputes;
assisting in preparing for settlement negotiations or mediation; and
making appropriate referrals to other agencies or entities when further resources are needed.

The ombudsman assists small businesses by:

providing information regarding what to do when an employee reports an injury;
directing them to appropriate resources for assistance in obtaining and resolving issues regarding workers' compensation insurance; and
responding to questions pertaining to employers' responsibilities under Minnesota's workers' compensation law.

Hopefully more states will recognize that their to assist employees and employers in what has become a very complicated process. The Minnesotta effort will go along way to relieve stress and anxiety for everyone involved in the process.

Saturday, September 10, 2011

What Congress Really Needs To Do To Solve the Asbestos Epidemic

The Republican House Majority is again putting on its old and tired dog and pony show to blame the victims of asbestos disease for their occupational illness that were in fact caused by employers and manufactures of asbestos products. The Industry is pulling out the old fraud card and soap box at a scheduled Congressional hearings next week.

Asbestos has been known to be a fatal carcinogen for decades. It is a cause of latent disease that may take decades to manifest after the initial exposure. Minimal exposure to asbestos may be fatal. Asbestos has been linked to asbestosis, and malignancies such as mesothelioma and lung cancer. There is no universal ban on the use of asbestos fiber in the US. Asbestos victims have been held hostage by Congress to give up more rights for compensation as the debate for imposition of a national ban on asbestos continues.

Decades of litigation, originating in US workers' compensation claims, and liability claims, has revealed that employers and manufacturers concealed important information from employees who were exposed to deadly asbestos fiber. That malfeasance has resulted in benefits and awards to injured workers and their families through the US civil justice system and bankruptcy claim process.

Asbestos litigation has evolved in waves or surges of claims over the decades. It is very long term litigation. Sometimes amounting to decades of processing after manifestation of the disease process. Recently there has been an upswing in the number of bystanders and household contacts who suffer disease. This is caused by yet another generation of workers, their family members and bystanders who have been exposed to asbestos fiber. Some has been the result of mere home demolition and rehabilitation. Ironically, many of the victims, first responders and innocent bystanders of The September 11th Attack were exposed by the pulverization of asbestos containing building materials on the attack on the World Trade Center.

It is an unfortunate turn of events when the Republican dominated Congress points the finger at the innocent asbestos victims. The nation would be better served if the focus were on the real culprits, those who manufactured the epidemic of asbestos disease, and an effort made to increase research for a cure to asbestos related illness. It is hopefully time for Congress to help the victims get access to benefits, invest in medical research, and to impose a universal ban of asbestos in the nation.

For over 3 decades the Law Offices of Jon L. Gelman 1.973.696.7900 jon@gelmans.com have been representing injured workers and their families who have suffered occupational accidents and illnesses.

Thursday, September 8, 2011

OSHA Cites Manufacturers and Distributors of Formaldehyde Hair Products

Companies failed to protect workers, warn product users of hazards

The U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration has cited two Florida manufacturers and two Florida-based distributors of hair products containing formaldehyde for 16 health violations involving alleged failures to protect their employees from possible formaldehyde exposure and to communicate with the products' users, such as salons and stylists, about the hazards of formaldehyde exposure. Proposed penalties for the companies total $49,200.

"Employers are responsible for identifying the risks associated with producing and using these hair products, as well as for taking appropriate measures to ensure that they protect their own employees and other workers who may be using their products, such as stylists, from any potential hazards," said Cindy Coe, OSHA's regional administrator in Atlanta.

OSHA's inspections were initiated based on a referral by Oregon's Occupational Safety and Health Division, which tested more than 100 product samples at 50 salons using hair smoothing or straightening products. Some products causing formaldehyde exposure were traced back to the Florida manufacturers and distributors. Formaldehyde can irritate the eyes and nose, and cause coughing and wheezing. It is a sensitizer, which means that it can cause allergic reactions of the lungs, skin and eyes, such as asthma, rashes and itching. It also has been linked to cancer.

Both M&M International Inc. in Delray Beach, a distributor of the straightening hair product "Marcia Teixeira," and Copomon Enterprises in Boca Raton, a distributor of the keratin-based hair product "Keratin Complex Smoothing Therapy," have been cited for three serious violations and fined $12,600 each for failing to ensure that material safety data sheets reflected the content of formaldehyde in the products or the hazards associated with formaldehyde exposure, as well as for failing to develop a written hazard communication program for their own employees. A serious violation occurs when there is substantial probability that death or serious physical harm could result from a hazard about which the employer knew or should have known.

Pro Skin Solutions Inc. in Orlando, a manufacturer of keratin-based products used for hair straightening, has been cited for five serious violations with penalties of $15,000. Violations include failing to establish a written respiratory protection plan, provide an emergency eyewash station, develop appropriate procedures to protect employees in the event of an emergency and develop or implement a written hazard communication program. The company also failed to address formaldehyde exposure and inhalation hazards, including possible cancer-causing effects, on material safety data sheets for the formaldehyde-containing products.

Additionally, Pro Skin Solutions has been cited for two other-than-serious violations with no monetary penalties for failing to maintain air sampling records and provide written procedures for evaluating chemical hazards. An other-than-serious violation is one that has a direct relationship to job safety and health, but probably would not cause death or serious physical harm.

Keratronics Inc. in Coral Springs, a manufacturer of keratin-based products used for hair straightening, has been cited for three serious violations with penalties of $9,000 for failing to provide an eyewash station for employees using corrosive products, evaluate the hazards of keratin-based products for development of the material safety data sheets, and develop or maintain a written hazard communication program on handling chemicals such as timonacic acid, formalin, acetic acid and hydrolyzed keratin.

All manufacturers, importers and distributers are required by OSHA standards to identify formaldehyde on any product that contains more than 0.1 percent formaldehyde, either as a gas or in a solution that can release formaldehyde at concentrations greater than 0.1 part per million. The material safety data sheet that comes with the product also must include this information, as well as explain why the chemical is hazardous, what harm it can cause, what protective measures should be taken and what to do in an emergency. The sheets are used by employers to determine products' potential health hazards and methods to prevent worker exposure.

Federal OSHA issued a hazard alert earlier this year to hair salon owners and employees about potential formaldehyde exposure resulting from working with some hair smoothing and straightening products. It can be viewed at http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/formaldehyde/hazard_alert.html.

In addition, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration recently issued a warning letter to GIB LLC in North Hollywood, Calif., doing business as Brazilian Blowout, concerning misbranding relating to formaldehyde. That letter is available at http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/EnforcementActions/WarningLetters/ucm270809.htm.

Keratronics, M&M International and Copomon Enterprises were inspected by OSHA's Fort Lauderdale Area Office, 1000 S. Pine Island Road, Suite 100, Fort Lauderdale, Fla. 33324; telephone 954-424-0242. Pro Skin Solutions was inspected by OSHA's Tampa Area Office, located at 5807 Breckenridge Parkway, Suite A, Tampa, Fla. 33610; telephone 813-626-1177. To report workplace incidents, fatalities or situations posing imminent danger to workers, call the agency's toll-free hotline at 800-321-OSHA (6742).

The companies have 15 business days from receipt of the citations and proposed penalties to comply, request a conference with OSHA's area director or contest the findings before the independent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.

Wednesday, September 7, 2011

Distracted Driving Accidents Echo Intoxication Caused Injuries

The New England Journal of Medicine reports that the activism against driving while intoxicated is beginning to be mirrored in distracted driving crashes. This parallel will probably cause workers' compensation courts and state legislature to shortly revisit the compensability of certain claims caused by employees who engage in distracted driving and will likely bar them from eligibility as workers compensation claims.

"As cell phone technology improved, texting while driving, which necessitates taking one’s eyes off the road, also became a major concern. The new term 'distracted driving' encompasses many behaviors that divert attention from driving, hampering awareness and performance and increasing risk."

The moral outrage being generated from distracted driving behavior will most likely mandate the imposition of technological changes to restrict cell phone use in moving vehicles. While that technology is being developed and deployed, workers and their employers should take heed of the growing public policy against such conduct.

Turning Over in Bed Not Compensable Event

A NJ Workers' Compensation Court has held that turning over in bed to shut off an alarm clock, an act that aggravating a pre-existing back injury, was not a compensable workers' compensation event. The Court held that the subsequent event, turning in bed, was an intervening, superseding event unrelated to the original work related accident.

The Court enunciated that in workers' compensation claims the injured worker has the burden of proof to establish the causal relationship of the subsequent event to the prior event. This "bridging" of causal relationship is well defined in the law of torts under the so-called "but for rule." The second event, turning in bed, was considered an unrelated intentional act and not compensable.

Judge Philip A. Tornetta stated in his opinion, "... There was not a scintilla of evidence to refute the fact that petitioner’s turning in bed was nothing more than an innocent, unintentional act , which no doctor had restricted him from doing."

Ippolitto v County of Bergen, et al., NJ Division of Workers' Compensation, CP 2007-25283, 2010-17376, Decided August 1, 2011.

Tuesday, September 6, 2011

9-11 Photographic Remembrance - Photographer Joe McNally Comments on His Project

Joe McNally, an incredibly skilled professional photographer discusses his project commemorating the 10 anniversary of the World Trade Center attack in New York City. Joe's recent blog reveals his dedication, commitment and endurance in photographing the horrific event 10 years ago and then updating the project for the 10th Anniversary. His project is now on display at the Time-Warner Center in New York City.

Click here to read the Blog Post: http://bit.ly/n7rR7v

Home Renovation Cited As An Increased Risk for Mesothelioma

This old house is becoming a serious health hazard as renovations are made to asbestos laden homes. A recent study published in the Medical Journal of Australia reports that an increased trend of mesothelioma, a rare and fatal cancer causally connected to asbestos exposure, in exposures related to home renovation. The latency period for the disease's development, time of exposure to time of manifestation of mesothelioma, was found to be shorter than expected.

Even though asbestos was banned in Australia in 2003 the number of claims has continued to increase. This is a typical occurrence in asbestos related illness. The cancer may not develop for 15 to 35 years following exposure.

While workers' compensation have provided some benefit to injured workers and dependents in the US over the last 3 decades, most claims have sought recoveries against the suppliers, manufacturers and health research organizations of asbestos fiber. That litigation is not limited by the narrow and limited recovery caps of a workers' compensation claim.

Old housing stock may contain many asbestos products including: attic insulation, boiler and plumbing insulation, asbestos backed flooring tiles, ceiling tiles, roofing, and spackling and plaster. While asbestos is not yet banned in the US, workers should carefully test old houses before renovations.

Monday, September 5, 2011

Asbestos: ADAO to Livestream the film -- Breathtaking

Kathleen Mullen’s Documentary Gives Comprehensive Insight into the Tragedy Associated with Commercial Mining

The Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization (ADAO,) which combines education, advocacy, and community to provide a unified voice for asbestos victims, today announced that it will be livestreaming Breathtaking on September 26th. The documentary, directed by Ontario filmmaker Kathleen Mullen, is “a personal investigation into the continued use of asbestos” and details her father’s tragic death due to exposure to asbestos from Canadian mining.

Breathtaking addresses the asbestos industry through a moving and personal investigation into the death of Mullen’s father, and the baffling present-day use, pubic mining, and incessant export of asbestos in spite of decades of scientific evidence that asbestos kills people. Commercially mined since the Industrial Revolution, asbestos was nicknamed the ‘magic mineral’ for its fabric-like, and fire retardant properties and has been used in everything from brake pads to oven mitts. Although it has been discovered to be carcinogenic, and asbestos use has been banned in many countries and limited in others. However, Canada, Russia and several other countries, still mine asbestos and export it for use in developing nations.

Mullen uses heartbreaking clips of her dying father’s legal testimony, together with family photos, and home movies to take the audience on an investigative journey. From her family home in British Columbia to Quebec, India and Detroit, Mullen paints a global, yet still personal picture of the many lives affected by the continued use of asbestos.

“As I began Breathtaking, everyone to whom I mentioned I was making the film responded with a personal story of their own,” Mullen says. “I soon realized that this story was a lot bigger than just my own family’s grief.”

The Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization (ADAO) recognizes the global and negative impact of the Canadian asbestos industry and has partnered with Mullen to hold a first-ever, international livestreaming of Breathtaking on September 26th, 2011 at 6:30 pm EST from the ADAO website.

The 45 minute screening will begin with a short introduction from Mullen and conclude with a thirty minute question and answer session via Twitter with the filmmaker and ADAO President and Co-Founder, Linda Reinstein.

“ADAO is thrilled to be able to bring this critical issue to the forefront through the incredible film,Breathtaking. It is through the new avenues of digital technology and social media that we are seeing awareness about asbestos hazards expand rapidly around the globe,” said Reinstein about the livestreaming event.

Click Here To View Trailer: http://tinyurl.com/4yznj99

Friday, September 2, 2011

When the Boss Calls

The use of cells phones while driving still remains a serious problem as drivers continue to ignore laws throughout the country. Unenforced and unenforceable laws throughout the nation aren't meeting the well intentioned goal of restricting their use. A major excuse is the need to use it for work and my "boss" required the employee to use it.

The epidemic of distracted driving continues to spread. Economic consequences are not yet frequent enough and severe enough to change the culture of abuse. Industry still hasn't taken the bold steps required to solve the problem.

Even though the genie of the "car phone" is out of the bottle, carefully engineered technology can resolve the problem. The same companies that brought us the unhealthy combination of cell phones and distracted driving can engineer the cure.

Employers seem to lack the economic motivation to take action. Employers who insit on their use for employment reasons can be compared to those employers who remove a machine guard to increase production at the cost of injury. It is senseless and tragic to insist that employees are required to us cellphones for employment. It is time that mandatory technology safeguards be implemented to curb abuse and avoid trajic and unnecessary accidents.

Thursday, September 1, 2011

Who Is Paying the Premiums for Workers Compensation Anyway

Employes have been subject to "give backs" and "add on" costs for decades, but now employers want to shift the cost of workers compensation insurance to employees. The intent of the workers' compensation act was to shift the costs of workers' compensation coverage to the consumer of the product and/or user of the service and not the employee.

A recent Massachusetts Judge reiterated that principle, but left open the question as to whether the employee could consensually contract to accept the costs of workers' compensation coverage. If this occurs, it is ultimately a "deal breaker."

Cost shifting of workers' compensation coverage is a dangerous precedent going to the heart of the initial promise made to workers in creating the system. Is is against "public policy," and defeats the Legislative intent of the act. While the economy is soft and the workers' compensation system in a weakened condition it is not time to abandon ship unless a more creative approach for reform of the entire system comes into play. As jobs remain scarce, the process would not be consensual, but merely coercion. Shifting the cost would ultimately remove the deterrent effect for unsafe workplaces, and yet is another reason why employers and ultimately consumers should remain responsible for workers compensation costs.

See: Awuah v. Coverall North America, Inc.,--- N.E.2d ----, Mass. , 2011 WL 3805255, Mass., August 31, 2011 (NO. SJC-10829)

For over 3 decades the Law Offices of Jon L. Gelman 1.973.696.7900 jon@gelmans.com have been representing injured workers and their families who have suffered occupational accidents and illnesses.

Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Surveillance Crosses the Privacy Line

Surveillance in workers compensation matters creates sensitive issues regarding privacy. The bright-line of what is public versus private becomes even more acute as employers and insurance companies investigate fraud concerns. When companies cross the line the consequences can be serious.

Several Montana attorneys have sought relief from a Court for what they call a breach of the privacy of the injured workers whom they represent. The attorneys allege that insurance fraud investigators, on behalf of a Montana insurance fund, have violated the privacy rights of their client by recording surveillance videos and giving them to examining physicians, in order to facilitate reports that the injured workers are malingering.

The attorneys represent that in over 800 instances, over the past several years, criminal surveillance tapes were unilaterally provided to defense medical experts to the detriment of their client's right to privacy. Harassment of injured workers creates fear that deters claims to benefit of employers and their insurance carriers. Inured workers have limited resources to fight such unscrupulous behavior. The attorneys in Montana had done a great pro bono and public service to take on Goliath on behalf of David. Hopefully the courts will balance the playing field and protect the rights of the injured worker from such tactics.

Workers' compensation was designed as a simple and equitable system. It was intentionally designed for the benefit of all the parties who participate in it. It is important that when the system becomes unbalanced that all the participants join in the effort equally to both redesign and rebalance the program.

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Zadroga 9-11 Compensation Fund To Accept Claims October 3rd

The 9/11 Zadrogra Compensation Fund is scheduled to start accepting claims for compensation on October 3, 2011. Announcement of the publication of the Final Rule was just announced.

With the 10-year anniversary of Sept. 11, 2001, approaching, September 11th Victim Compensation Fund (VCF) Special Master Sheila L. Birnbaum today announced the final rule governing the fund. Since issuing the proposed regulations in June 2011, Special Master Birnbaum has reviewed formal comments and met with, and received feedback from, hundreds of New York-area residents, workers and first responders at town hall meetings held in New York and New Jersey.

For more information about The 9/11 Fund claims click here.

For over 3 decades the Law Offices of Jon L. Gelman 1.973.696.7900 jon@gelmans.com have been representing injured workers and their families who have suffered occupational accidents and illnesses.

Copyright

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Related articles

Related articles

Tuesday, September 13, 2011

Related articles

Monday, September 12, 2011

Related articles

Saturday, September 10, 2011

Related articles

Thursday, September 8, 2011

For over 3 decades the Law Offices of Jon L. Gelman 1.973.696.7900 jon@gelmans.com have been representing injured workers and their families who have suffered occupational accidents and illnesses.

Related articles

Wednesday, September 7, 2011

Related articles

Related articles

Tuesday, September 6, 2011

Related articles

Related articles

Monday, September 5, 2011

Related articles

Friday, September 2, 2011

Related articles

Thursday, September 1, 2011

Related articles

Wednesday, August 31, 2011

For over 3 decades the Law Offices of Jon L. Gelman 1.973.696.7900 jon@gelmans.com have been representing injured workers and their families who have suffered occupational accidents and illnesses.

Related articles

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Related articles