CMS Moved the Coordination of Benefits Secure Website (COBSW)

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has formally moved:

The URL for accessing the Section 111 Coordination of Benefits Secure Website (COBSW) has been changed to: https://www.cob.cms.hhs.gov/Section111//.
July 13, 2015 - Updated MMSEA Section 111 NGHP User Guide Version 4.7 - Chapters I-V Now Available

The updated MMSEA Section 111 NGHP User Guide dated July 13, 2015 has been posted to the NGHP User Guide page. Refer to Chapter 1-1 of each chapter for a summary of Version 4.7 updates.

COVID Boosters: What Employees and Employers Need to Know

Many employers and state governments are mandating that employees be vaccinated against COVID. Confusion remains over the rapidly changing landscape of booster doses as reports of waning or compromised immunity even though a worker is considered “fully vaccinated” when the original series of doses are completed. 

Published: 2011 Workers' Compensation Law Treatise

The 2011 Supplement to Gelman on Workers' Compensation Law has been published and is shipping. Now in its third edition, the 3 volume hard-bound series, provides a comprehensive analysis of workers' compensation law. Published by West Publishing, a business of Thomsom-Reuters, it is totally integrated into the West citation system and Westlaw® research system. The series and updates may be ordered in hardbound, CD-Rom and/or accessed thorough the Westlaw® research system.

What's New

The newly enacted statutory changes to the New Jersey Workers’ Compensation Act and promulgated Rules permitting Emergent Medical Care Motions, new registration requirements for insurers, and new judicial enforcement powers of Judges of Compensation, including sanctions and contempt powers, are contained in this supplemental material. The judicial decision imposing direct liability against an insurance carrier for delay and/or denial of medical treatment is discussed.

An analysis of the newly adopted procedures for the reimbursement of conditional payments established by Medicare and the protocols to co-ordinate workers’ compensation claims with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services is contained in this supplement. The materials also provide the authorizations required to obtain conditional payment information from the Coordinator of Benefits. Debt collection referral to the Department of the Treasury is also reviewed.

The new Community and Worker Right to Know material has been incorporated into this supplement. The current hazardous substance lists and the substances that have been deemed extremely dangerous are provided.

The supplement reviews new case law concerning electronic cancellation of coverage as well as the standard for claims to be considered casually related to the employment.

The judicial interpretation of the Exclusivity Doctrine is discussion in light of the dual capacity status of a household contact / bystander and also former employee. The evidential requirements in latent occupational claims is reviewed.

The mandatory reporting requirements of the SCHIP Extension Act of 2007 are described as well as the appeal procedure under the reimbursement provision of the Medicare Secondary Payer Act.

These pocket parts provide information concerning the requirements for medical monitoring in workers’ compensation claims. It discusses. the Asbestos Fund, which has been established for those entities where workers’ compensation coverage cannot be established. The newly designed forms that need to be utilized in filing for benefits are included. Also, the recently modified Motion for Temporary and Medical Benefits, including a form Certification, is provided and discussed.

The newly revised Judgments for Total and Permanent Disability are provided in this pocket part. The Judgments include new refinements in offsets for pensions and Social Security disability benefits. Reviewed also is the “intentional wrong exception” to the Exclusivity Bar which has been the subject of new workers’ compensation insurance policy language and regulation.

The recently promulgated administrative rules governing the disposition of Temporary Disability Benefits are discussed. The non-duplication of benefits provisions are reviewed including the multiple agency adjudication process. An expansion of benefits available to Federal public safety officers is reviewed in this supplement.

Collateral medical benefit issues are discussed in light of the recent Supreme Court decision concerning this matter. The pocket parts include a Motion to Join the Collateral Health Carrier and provide sample Certifications to be used in support of the application. New pleadings issued by the Division of Workers’ Compensation in the area of medical payment and reimbursement claims are provided and commented upon in these materials.

Additionally, these pocket parts provide information concerning the new Rules of the Division of Workers’ Compensation embodying electronic filing requirements and new procedures involving both formal and informal proceedings, motion practice, post judgment process, and judicial performance. The expanded Medicare secondary reporting requirements and the mandatory coordination of benefits are reviewed in this supplement. The recovery aspects of Medicare conditional payments as well as future medical provisions are updated and discussed. The new Child Support Lien distribution forms, computation worksheets and judgments are provided and explained in depth. The NJ Supreme’ Court ruling and the legislative enactments are discussed concerning same sex couples and the availability of workers’ compensation benefits.

This supplement reviews the newly promulgated Rules concerning the Uninsured Employers’ Fund and audio and video coverage of workers’ compensation proceedings. The horrific tragedy of September 11th, 2001 and the impact it has upon the Workers’ Compensation system is discussed. This supplement reviews the newly enacted Smallpox Emergency Protection Act as well as recent court decisions concerning acts of terrorism. The subsequent legislative changes enacted in response to potential terrorist threats are reviewed, including the Public Safety Officers’ Benefit Act as well as the liberalized legislative enactments involving rescue workers and medical personnel.

The far-reaching ramifications of the newly enacted healthcare reform legislation are reviewed. The new prototype occupational medical care program, encompassing potential occupational exposure claims, is presented in this supplement.

The impact of the newly promulgated Federal rules and regulations concerning medical record privacy and compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA) medical authorization requirements are reviewed in this supplement and model forms are furnished. The recently enacted statutory workers' compensation coverage options available to proprietors and partners are discussed. The supplement reviews the recent court decisions expanding the responsibility of the Second Injury Fund for pre-existing medical conditions in cases in which latent diseases become manifest during retirement. The statutory enactments concerning State Temporary Disability Benefits are reviewed. The recently amended Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Act is explained in detail and forms are furnished and discussed.

The new administration and management of claims arising from insolvent workers’ compensation insurance is covered in this pocket part.

The recent Supreme Court decisions concerning the high judicial threshold for evaluation of scientific evidence are analyzed. The requirements for proof of scientific evidence in complex workers’ compensation cases are discussed including the admissibility of testimony from non-physicians experts. Furthermore, the evolving and expanding issues concerning medical monitoring are reviewed.

This pocket part also discusses recent changes in the application for counsel fees. The supplement includes the newly promulgated administrative directive embodying those changes.

To Order

The series and updates may be ordered in hardbound, CD-Rom and/or accessed thorough the Westlaw® research system.

More Information
Table of Contents Supp. 2011
Index, Supp. 2011
Summary of Contents

Related articles

• US Workers Compensation Centennial Commission (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Plaintiffs' Law Firm Jon L. Gelman Ranked a Best Law Firm by U.S. News & World Report (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Facebook Makes an Appearance in Workers' Compensation Court (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• New Jersey Issues Workers Compensation Guidance on Evaluating Disputed Medical Provider Claims (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Congresswoman Woolsey Calls For A GAO Study of Workers Compensation-Cites Insurance Company Cost Shifting (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)

OK's True Cost Control Feature

Counsel fees are a critical element to workers' compensation claims. David DePaolo's recent blog post highlights how counsel fees motivate some claim strategies in Oklahoma where a 30% fee prevails. Today's post was shared by WorkCompCentral and comes from daviddepaolo.blogspot.com

Most of the attention Oklahoma's reform is getting in the work comp world is about opt-out. But another minor provision of that law may be something more meaningful for traditional work comp systems to keep an eye on. Oklahoma for some time has had a "value added" provision on its books for attorney fees. In short, claimant attorneys fees are capped at 30%, but in the past that cap was available only if the employer admitted the claim, provided medical coverage and made a written settlement offer. Under Senate Bill 1062 all that is required now is that the employer make a written settlement offer, then the claimant attorney fee is capped at 30% of the difference between what the settlement offer is, and what the award actually ends up being. For instance, if an employer offers an injured worker a settlement of $10,000, the worker hires an attorney and obtains a $15,000 settlement, the claimant's attorney would only be entitled to attorney fees of up to 30% on the $5,000 difference between the two awards. Because the law in the past required admitting liability and providing medical services, many employers deferred making settlement offers, thus prolonging case adjudication, ergo expense. Since employers would have to admit the claim in order to invoke the cap on attorney fees, claimants' attorneys began adding additional body parts to increase the value of the case and make it more difficult for employers to admit the claim - employers were loath to admit to body parts that they...

[Click here to see the rest of this post]

Related articles

• Legal Fees and Reform (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Witnesses present divergent settlement figures in Garlock estimation trial (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Liberty Mutual FIles Suit in NY To Stop Elimination of Reopener Fund (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Workers' Compensation Benefits, Employer Costs Rise with Economic Recovery (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Senate fails to revive workers' comp bill for first responders (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Needlestick Injuries Are a Costly Problem for the Health Care Industry (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Texas Pointing Way to Healthy Market (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• "Opting Out" of Worker's Compensation Hurts Workers and Employers (Part 1) (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Facebook Disclosure for 87 Class Action Plaintiffs? Federal Court Denies Discovery Request (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)

Found on

Reshaping Workers’ Compensation for the Sharing Economy

The most dramatic factor in re-shaping the future of workers’ compensation is that we now have a sharing economy,  Quietly, over the decades, “work” has been influenced dramatically by the Millennial Generation. As the sharing generation reinvents the economy, the element of “trust” will have the most important impact in the direction of social legislative programs such as workers’ compensation.

Compensation Judges Are Becoming Linkedin

A new trend is underway as Judges reach out for ways to stay informed and exchange information in the new technology of the world. It has been reported that Judges from the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals to State trial level Judges are reaching out to stay connected. Derek Mosley, a municipal court judge in Wisconsin, is linked to over 419 connections on linked in.

Workers' Compensation Judges have joined the social networking crowd in large numbers. Over 445 "hits" show up on Linkedin.com for workers compensation judges. While some links are public others are private allowing for anonymity.

It has been reported that Judges have used Facebook searches to establish the veracity of excuses in case where the attorney calls in sick. The opposite may now be true, the attorney might be able to learn what the Judge has eaten for breakfast.

The logic for connecting through the social networking community is well placed. The access to information through connections and groups provides information, trends and analysis at low cost and relatively ease of use.

Working ‘Off the Clock’ is Not OK

Working ‘Off the Clock’ is Not OK.

Today's post was shared by Trucker Lawyers and comes from www.facebook.com

Pilot Travel Center employees in #‎Mississippi "were working through lunch, without pay" ... The employees ended up receiving "$141,096 in back wages and liquidated damages." This award made a difference in the lives of the employees and their loved ones, according to the article below. #‎workers Here's the intro from the U.S. Department of Labor: "Not paying workers for all of the hours they worked not only harms the workers, but also their families by depriving them of the wages they need to get by. Because of a Wage and Hour Division investigation, the employees at Pilot Travel Center received $141,096 in back wages and liquidated damages. More information about workers’ rights and employers’ responsibilities also is available at www.dol.gov/whd." Working ‘Off the Clock’ is Not OK.

[Click here to see the rest of this post]

Found on

Related articles

• US sues Los Arcos Mexican Grill & Seafood in Tennessee to recover unpaid minimum and overtime wages for 70 employees (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Oakland A's Will Pay Back Wages to Interns and Clubhouse Workers (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• NJ Gas Station Owner Agrees to Pay $3 Million in Back Wages to Employees (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Wage Theft -- Another Assault on Workers' Compensation (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• US Department of Labor recovers $4.83 million in back wages, damages for more than 4,500 Wal-Mart workers (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Truckers Fired Over Workers' Comp Claim: What to Do Next (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Wage Theft is a Much Bigger Problem Than Other Forms of Theft - But Workers Remain Mostly Unprotected (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)

Worker Alleging Workers Compensation Discrimination Awarded $361,000

A worker in Minnesota was awarded $361,000 against his employer for being discriminated against for filing a workers' compensation claim. The worker alleged that the employer terminated him after he suffered a work related accident and filed a claim for workers' compensation benefits.

The worker was injured on the job when a car lost control and struck the truck that the worker was driving. The employer alleged that the employee did not disclose previous injuries on his job application and terminated him. A jury subsequently awarded the injured employee $111,000 in dames for lost wages and emotional distress and another $250,000 for punitive damages.

In New Jersey a discrimination complaint may be filed with the Division of Workers' Compensation as an administrative remedy, which is separate from any common law action which might be instituted against the employer. The Division of Workers' Compensation shall conduct an investigation and forward the complaint and the results of the investigation to the Commissioner of the Department of Labor within 30 days of filing. The Commissioner will then act in accordance with the statutory provisions to determine whether or not there has been an unlawful discharge of, or discrimination against, the employee as a result of an application for workers' compensation benefits or as a result of the employee's testimony in a workers' compensation claim. An employee who has been discriminated against will be restored to his employment and will be compensated by his employer for any loss of wages arising out of the discrimination, as long as he is still qualified to perform his job duties.

For over 3 decades the Law Offices of Jon L. Gelman  1.973.696.7900  jon@gelmans.com have been representing injured workers and their families who have suffered occupational accidents and illnesses.

Related articles

• Using the Forbidden Words-Texas Workers Compensation (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Bilateral Carpal Tunnel Results in Workers' Compensation Total Disability (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Atlantic Mutual Placed into Liquidation (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• CDC Urges Employers to Prohibit Cell Phone Use While Driving (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• New Facebook Address for Injured Workers Law and Advocacy Group (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)

Chinese Hackers Pursue Key Data on U.S. Workers

The meaning of confidentiality appears to be strained daily by reports in the media that digital information is either made public by hacking and/or government access. Workers' Compensation by law in most jurisdiction has been built on a theoretical foundation of privacy and confidentiality. The ramification of disclosure of this information will bring discrimination to a level level of development that may may inhibit the filing of claims altogether. Today's post is share from the NYTimes.com and reflects a concern over the extent of data disclosure about US Workers.

Chinese hackers in March broke into the computer networks of the United States government agency that houses the personal information of all federal employees, according to senior American officials. They appeared to be targeting the files on tens of thousands of employees who have applied for top-secret security clearances.

The hackers gained access to some of the databases of the Office of Personnel Management before the federal authorities detected the threat and blocked them from the network, according to the officials. It is not yet clear how far the hackers penetrated the agency’s systems, in which applicants for security clearances list their foreign contacts, previous jobs and personal information like past drug use.

In response to questions about the matter, a senior Department of Homeland Security official confirmed that the attack had occurred but said that “at this time,”...

[Click here to see the rest of this post]

Related articles

• U.S. may act to keep Chinese hackers out of Def Con hacker event (updatednews.ca)
• Hackers promise to break Tor on a $3,000 budget (dailydot.com)
• Keeping privacy in focus (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Mets' Harvey Is Covered Like Any Other Employee With a Workplace Injury (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Will Workers' Compensation Adapt to "On Demand" Employment (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Why We're Still Killing Workers in the USA (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• On-Demand Labor - Is Workers' Compensation Ready for Flex-Time Employment? (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Facebook Disclosure for 87 Class Action Plaintiffs? Federal Court Denies Discovery Request (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)

Federal Court Civil Action Stayed Pending Criminal Case

A civil action instituted by LM Insurance Corporation was stayed against a defendant employer pending a Federal criminal action. The application to stay the Federal civil action was made by the employer to the court following the issuance of multiple Grand Jury Subpoenas and the execution of a Search and Seizure Warrant against the defendant employer in his home and place of business.

Workers’ Compensation Is About Relationships

Today's post comes from guest author Ryan Benharris (MA) from Deborah G. Kohl Law Offices.

Prevention of accidents should be the first step in establishing a successful workers’ compensation system. If an employer were truly concerned about the health and safety of the employee there would be no need for workers’ compensation.

Unfortunately the profit motive of the employer sometimes corrupts the process, and shortcuts are taken at work to increase production at an anticipated lower cost to the employer.

Employers need to understand that the human and financial costs of industrial accidents and exposures can be devastating. Injured workers, through the workers’ compensation process, may seek the payment of medical benefits, lost time payments and permanent disability awards. 

Hopefully, the relationship between employees and employers can improve, and the workplace can become a safer environment.
....

Jon L.Gelman of Wayne NJ is the author NJ Workers’ Compensation Law (West-Thompson) and co-author of the national treatise, Modern Workers’ Compensation Law (West-Thompson). For over 3 decades the Law Offices of Jon L. Gelman 1.973.696.7900 jon@gelmans.com have been representing injured workers and their families who have suffered occupational accidents and illnesses.

More About Workers' Compensation and Medical Benefits

National Analysis of Workers Compensation Medical Benefits

Jul 30, 2011

The just published, Issue 3 of the Workers' Compensation Resources Research Report (WCRRR) provides 23 years of information on cash benefits, medical benefits, and total (cash plus medical) benefits per 100,000 workers ...

http://workers-compensation.blogspot.com/

Workers' Compensation: Health Benefits, US Supreme Court and ...

Mar 21, 2012

The implementation of the Act will ultimately have far reaching consequences of the overall operation of both the delivery of workers' compensation medical benefits and the ultimate assessment/apportionment of permanent ...

http://workers-compensation.blogspot.com/

Workers' Compensation Medical Benefits are in Critical Condition

Nov 13, 2008

Now that Barach Obama is a going to be at the helm of the US, greater attention is being focused on the need for a national health care system incorporating workers' compensation medical coverage. With private insurance ...

http://workers-compensation.blogspot.com/

Pensions, Workers Compensation and Medical Benefits

Aug 29, 2011

The medical issue remains open usually and medical benefits remain the responsibility of the employer. The medical issue becomes a complication when costs are attempted to be shifted to collateral medical carriers or ...

http://workers-compensation.blogspot.com/

Related articles

• Why Doctors Prescribe Opioids to Known Opioid Abusers - NEJM
• NJ Workers Compensation Court Disrupted by Storm
• $85 Million Verdict Against KBR for Negligently Exposing Soldiers to Toxins in Iraq
• Employee Termination Because of Facebook Comment Does Not End Workers' Compensation Benefits

Public Disclosures Don't Bar Halliburton FCA Suit, Court Says

Today's post is shared from law360.org. The False Claims Act’s public disclosure bar does not prevent a water purification specialist's lawsuit accusing Halliburton Co and KBR Inc of violating contractual duties to test and purify lavatory and drinking water used by U.S. troops in Iraq, a federal court in Virginia ruled on Thursday. The FCA’s public disclosure bar jurisdictionally bans claims based on matters that were publicly disclosed unless the relator was the original source of the allegations. Although the court ruled that the companies did make public disclosures about the information at-issue, it determined that it was more likely than not that whistleblower Benjamin Carter did not base his claims on that information. “Carter has shown that he had independent knowledge of the facts underlying his claim and that he derived his allegations from his own independent knowledge,” the court wrote. Carter, a former reverse osmosis water purification unit operator, has long been locked in a legal battle against Halliburton and KBR affiliate Kellogg Brown & Root Services Inc. over claims they billed the government for water purification work they never did at U.S. bases in Al Asad and Ar Ramadi, Iraq. Halliburton had argued that Carter got his information from prior allegations brought against the oil company, but the district court ruled that Carter based his claims on first-hand experiences. “Although the...

[Click here to see the rest of this post]

Found on

Related articles

• KBR Seeks Combat Immunity in Soldier Toxic-Exposure Suit (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• BP ordered to pay $130 million to oil spill claims administrator (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Facebook Disclosure for 87 Class Action Plaintiffs? Federal Court Denies Discovery Request (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Employee Rights Hurt by Supreme Court Decisions (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Tribunal finds Chevron not liable for environmental claims in Ecuador (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)

Blowing the Whistle on Unsafe Workplace Conditions Gets a Boost

The New Jersey Supreme Court gave a boost to whistleblowers who challenge employers. The Court in a 4 to 2 decision held that an employee who becomes the victim of employer retaliation for engaging in protected whistle-blowing activities, can file a wage-loss claim without proving constructive discharge.

An employee at DuPont Chambers Works for thirty years reported that phosgene gas, a highly toxic and reactive substance, was being handled in a dangerous fashion. The employee, who reported the unsafe workplace condition to the headquaters of DuPont buut became a target of employer harassment and suffered the residuals of psychological disability

Justice Albin, delivering the opinon of the Court stated: "If an employer engages in unlawful retaliation, then it is accountable for the damages proximately caused to the employee."

Donelson v. DuPont Chambers Works, A-112-09, Decided June 9, 2011 (NJ 2011)

Related articles

• Texas Disallows Work Comp Retaliation Suits Against State Based on Sovereign Immunity (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• New Facebook Address for Injured Workers Law and Advocacy Group (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Court Orders Workers' Compensation Insurance Carrier to Comply With OSHA Subpoena (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• US OSHA Warns Workers of Brazilian Blowout Formaldehyde Hazards (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Worker Alleging Workers Compensation Discrimination Awarded $361,000 (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)

Law to Ban Medical Expense Claims Proposed

Legislation (A-2652) [introduced May 10, 2012] has been proposed in NJ that would ban charging workers’ compensation claimants for medical expenses and gives the Division of Workers’ Compensation sole jurisdiction over work-related medical claims. The law would be a positive initiative for all parties as it will subject medical provider claims to an exclusive remedy and consolidate the claims before a single administrative agency for resolution.


The legislation will be the subject of consideration by the NJ Assembly Labor Committee on Monday, May 14, 2012.


Click here to read: Clearing the Workers' Compensation Benefit Highway of Medical Expense Land Mines

By John H. Geaney and Jon L. Gelman
"Medical expenses in contested workers’ compensation cases are now a significant and troublesome issue resulting in uncertainty, delay and potential future liability. Th recent NJ Supreme Court decision, University of Mass. Memorial Hospital v. Christodoulou, 180 N.J. 334 (2004) has left the question of how to adjudicate medical benefits that were conditionally paid or paid in error. Presently there is no exclusively defined procedure to determine the allocation, apportionment of primary responsibility for unauthorized medical expenses and reimbursement."


Statement of the Bill

"This bill prohibits the charging of workers’ compensation 
claimants for medical expenses that have been authorized by the 
employer or its carrier or its third party administrator, that have 
been paid by the employer, its carrier or third party administrator 
pursuant to pursuant to the workers’ compensation law, or which 
been determined by the Division of Workers’ Compensation to 
be the responsibility of the employer, its carrier or third party 
administrator.  The bill gives the division sole jurisdiction over 
disputed work-related medical claims, and directs the division to 
provide procedures to resolve those disputes, including procedural 
requirements for medical providers or any other party to the 
dispute.  Finally, the bill provides that the treatment of an injured 

worker or the payment of workers’ compensation to an injured 

worker or dependent of an injured or deceased worker shall not be 
delayed because of a claim by a medical provider. "


Further Reference:
NJ Task Force Report on Medical Provider Claims
"During our meetings, it came to the attention of the Task Force that “balance billing” is a 
problem. This is the practice wherein authorized medical providers accept fees paid by the
carrier and then issue a bill to the petitioner for any remaining balance. In an effort to eradicate
this practice, the Task Force recommends an amendment to N.J.S.A. 34:15-15. Section 15 of the
Act requires that employers furnish and pay for physicians, surgeons and hospital services for the
injured worker. Having reviewed the statute and the case law, the Task Force believes that there
is a need to clarify that balance billing in the workers’ compensation setting is inappropriate.

Accordingly, the Task Force recommends the following amendment to N.J.S.A. 34:15-15 which
we would propose would appear as a paragraph between the final two paragraphs of that section.

This additional language would read as follows:
“Fees for treatments that have been authorized by the employer or
its carrier or its third party administrator, or which have been
determined by the court to be the responsibility of the employer, its
carrier or third party administrator, shall not be charged against or
collectible from the injured worker. Sole jurisdiction for any
disputed medical charge arising from a workers’ compensation
claim shall be vested in the Division of Workers’ Compensation.”

Related articles

• AIG Exits Workers Compensation As Comp Medical Issues Grow (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Facebook, Organ Donations and Medical Privacy of Workers' Compensation (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Trending: Opting-Out of Workers' Compensation (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Sidetracked By Drugs (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Federal RICO Claim May Not Be Preempted by a State Workers Compensation Act (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• NJ Supreme Court To Rule on Several Critical Issues (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• The Religious Opt-Out Scheme: A New Approach to Eliminate Workers' Compensation (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)

US Supreme Court Asked to Review MSP Preemption Issue

The US Supreme Court has been asked to review a claim on behalf of an injured worker who asserts that the Medicare Secondary Payer Act did not preempt State law (i.e.. Texas) that required a Workers' Compensation claimant to obtain preauthorization from relevant insurance carriers before incurring certain medical expenses. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals held that Medicare's conditional payment for a workers surgeries did not render the  state law mandate for  preauthorization requirements "moot."

A Writ of Certiorari was filed with the US Supreme Court on Aug. 8, 2012 and a response is due September 11, 2013 

Guadalupe Caldera v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, US Supreme Court Docket No. 12-40192. Case below, 716 F 3d 861, Docket No, 12-40192, 5th Cir Ct Appeals, Decided May 14, 2013.

….

Jon L.Gelman of Wayne NJ is the author NJ Workers’ Compensation Law (West-Thompson) and co-author of the national treatise, Modern Workers’ Compensation Law (West-Thompson). For over 4 decades the Law Offices of Jon L Gelman  1.973.696.7900  jon@gelmans.com  have been representing injured workers and their families who have suffered occupational accidents and illnesses.

Texting a Message to A Driver Imposes Liability for an Accident

In an unanimous decision a NJ Appellate Court held a texter potentially liable for causing a motor vehicle accident:

"The issue before us is not directly addressed by these
statutes or any case law that has been brought to our attention.
"We must determine as a matter of civil common law whether one
who is texting from a location remote from the driver of a motor
vehicle can be liable to persons injured because the driver was
distracted by the text. We hold that the sender of a text
message can potentially be liable if an accident is caused by
texting, but only if the sender knew or had special reason to
know that the recipient would view the text while driving and
thus be distracted.

"In this appeal, we must also decide whether plaintiffs have
shown sufficient evidence to defeat summary judgment in favor of
the remote texter. We conclude they have not. We affirm the
trial court's order dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against the
sender of the text messages, but we do not adopt the trial
court's reasoning that a remote texter does not have a legal
duty to avoid sending text messages to one who is driving.

"We conclude that a person sending text messages has a 
duty not to text someone who is driving if the texter knows, or 
has special reason to know, the recipient will view the text 
while driving. But we also conclude that plaintiffs have not 
presented sufficient evidence to prove that Colonna had such 
knowledge when she texted Best immediately before the accident.

LINDA KUBERT AND DAVID
KUBERT,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
KYLE BEST, SUSAN R. BEST,
EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF
NICKOLAS J. BEST, DECEASED,
Defendants,
and
SHANNON COLONNA,

Defendant-Respondent.
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
APPELLATE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. A-1128-12T4
August 27, 2013

….

Jon L. Gelman of Wayne NJ is the author NJ Workers’ Compensation Law (West-Thompson) and co-author of the national treatise, Modern Workers’ Compensation Law (West-Thompson). For over 4 decades the Law Offices of Jon L Gelman  1.973.696.7900  jon@gelmans.com  have been representing injured workers and their families who have suffered occupational accidents and illnesses.

Read more about "texting" and workers' compensation:

Working While Texting: The New Workers Compensation Defense

Jul 31, 2009

New technology encroaching upon the workplace has been both a help and a hindrance. Recent studies add to the growing volumes of data reporting that the use of cell phones while driving provides a significant distraction ...

http://workers-compensation.blogspot.com/

Distracted Driving Workers Compensation Claim Draws Major Public

Feb 11, 2011

A workers compensation claim filed by a state trooper for injuries he sustained while texting and speeding 126 miles per hour that resulting in a fatal accident with oncoming teenagers, a driver and a passenger, has drawn ...

http://workers-compensation.blogspot.com/

CDC Urges Employers to Prohibit Cell Phone Use While Driving

Apr 29, 2011

CDC urged employers to prohibit texting while driving. A safety initiative by employers will go along way to reducing workers' compensation costs. "What is already known on this topic? Highway transportation crashes are the ...

http://workers-compensation.blogspot.com/

Workers' Compensation: OSHA To Fine Employers for Distracted ...

Apr 18, 2011

Following the policy announced by President Obama in his Executive Order banning texting while driving, OSHA is calling upon all employers to ban texting while driving. It is the intention of OSHA to provide education and ...

http://workers-compensation.blogspot.com/

Related articles

• US Supreme Court Asked to Review MSP Preemption Issue (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Despite backlogs, VA disability claims processors get bonuses (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Who Is Paying the Bills for Occupational Illnesses and Disease? (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Report Recommends Raising Workers' Compensation Premiums (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Truck Drivers Beware - Your Insurance May Not be What You Think (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Facebook Disclosure for 87 Class Action Plaintiffs? Federal Court Denies Discovery Request (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Speed Camera Enforcement Will Begin on Sepember 9th, the First Day of School (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)

Senate fails to revive workers' comp bill for first responders

The NJ Senate has been unable change the burden of proof required for First Responders to prove compensability. While some jurisdictions have multiple "presumptions of compensability" statutorily enacted, NJ has consistently maintained a minimal number. Today's post was shared by WCBlog and comes from www.nj.com

State Senate Democrats have failed to override Gov. Chris Christie's recent veto of a bill that would have made it easier for emergency first responders to obtain workers' compensation coverage when they get injured or contract a disease on the job during a terrorist attack or another catastrophic event.

The bill would have required the employer to challenge any work-related injuries and illness, shifting the burden away from nurses, firefighters, police officers, rescue squad members and other first responders who have to prove how and when they were hurt or sickened under the current system.

Wages and medical benefits would be paid if "any death or disability, including post traumatic stress disorder, arises from the physical or psychological impact of stress or injury experienced by the public safety worker during response to a terrorist attack, epidemic or other catastrophic emergency," according to the bill sponsored by Sen. Linda Greenstein (D-Middlesex).
Christie said while the state is grateful for the heroic work of its first responders, New Jersey can't afford this legislation.

Protect American workers from exposure to silica on the job

At least 1.7 million construction workers could be protected from cancer-causing silica if an OSHA protection – stalled for two years – is put into action.

The Laborers International Union (LIUNA) has set up petition to the White House, urging the executive to move forward on the proposed OSHA rule to reduce silica exposures.  You can join the 2700 other people who have signed on here:

Sign the petition.

In the time it takes to create an account at the White House website – about three minutes – at least three more workers will have been exposed to silica. 

Workers Compensation Act Does Not Bar A Negligence Action Against A General Partnership

In a recent court decision, an injured worker was permitted, in addition to her workers' compensation claim, to file an action against the general partnership for negligent conduct. The Court found that even though the workers' compensation is no-fault, the employee has a right to proceed and recover damages directly against the general partnership.

The injured employee was employed by Time Warner Entertainment Co., L.P. and slipped on black ice in the parking lot. The employee filed and claimed benefits from the employer in workers' compensation. Additionally, the employee filed a civil action against, among others, the Time Warner EntertainmentAdvance/Newhouse Partnership.

The court held that the employee could pursue an action in negligence against a general partnership after receiving workers' compensation benefits from her employer.

Whitfield v. Bononno Real Estate Group, et al., 2011 WL 1798874 (N.J.Super. A.D.) Decided May 12, 2011.

For over 3 decades the Law Offices of Jon L. Gelman 1.973.696.7900 jon@gelmans.com have been representing injured workers and their families who have suffered occupational accidents and illnesses.


Related articles

• New Facebook Address for Injured Workers Law and Advocacy Group (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Court Orders Workers' Compensation Insurance Carrier to Comply With OSHA Subpoena (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Common Themes, The Green Mountain System & Newt Gingrich (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Bilateral Carpal Tunnel Results in Workers' Compensation Total Disability (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Google, Apple, Lucas Film Accused of Fixing Employee Wages (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)

Coronavirus (COVID-19) - The workers' compensation community should support TTSI

The workers' compensation community should play an active role to contain the spread of COIVD-19. Labor, Industry and insurance companies must be encouraged to participate in contact tracing, testing and supported isolation [TTSI]. All reports of illness and incidents of COVID-19 should trigger reportable investigations that are co-ordinated with local and state health agencies. Communication with employees should be encouraged for testing, isolation and expansion of contact testing.