Copyright

(c) 2010-2024 Jon L Gelman, All Rights Reserved.
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query medical privacy. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query medical privacy. Sort by date Show all posts

Thursday, December 5, 2013

ADAO Resource: How To Find a Doctor or Treatment Facility Specializing in Mesothelioma and Asbestos-Related Diseases

Seeking information about medical treatment concerning mesothelioma? The information made available by the ADAO makes the process less difficult, Especially during challenging moments.Today's post was shared by Linda Reinstein and comes from www.asbestosdiseaseawareness.org

Posted on December 4, 2013*Note: From the very founding of our organization, ADAO has abstained from providing any medical or legal referrals. ADAO remains an independent organization that is not influenced by outside sources, such as drug companies, law firms, or companies that manufacture or use asbestos.

Many of us can think back to the heartbreaking time when we first heard the news that a loved one had an asbestos-caused disease. “Mesothelioma – can’t pronounce it, can’t cure it,” was my devastated, personal reaction. It took me many weeks to even begin to understand the diagnosis my husband had received and find the very limited treatment options available to him.

My learning curve was steep and Alan was diagnosed before the advancement of the smart phone.

Navigating the health care system maze is complex – but it shouldn’t be. The Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization (ADAO) is committed to replacing those feelings of fear, loneliness and confusion with the knowledge that there are others who share your experience and want to support you.

We want you to have easy access to information about medical resources for asbestos-caused diseases. The National Cancer Institute has an excellent page, in English and Spanish, to answer your questions on “How To Find a Doctor or Treatment Facility...
[Click here to see the rest of this post]

Thursday, April 14, 2011

Privacy, Clients and Social Media Discussion


Social networking has become a popular topic within the workers’ comp community.  In this edition of Workers’ Comp Matters, host Attorney Alan S. Pierce, welcomes Attorney Jon L. Gelman, to take a look a social networking in the workers’ comp world. Alan and Jon discuss privacy and their clients, client responsibility when it comes to putting up information on social media sites and how social networking can be used as a portal to monitor clients.

Listen - Page URL:    http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/workers-comp-matters/2011/04/privacy-clients-and-social-media/

Listen - MP3 Link:    http://legaltalkmedia.com/LTN/WCM/WCM_030911_SocialNetworking.mp3

Friday, May 11, 2012

OSHA Proposes Fines for NJ Uniform & Laundry Company

The U.S. Department of Labor has cited Wilmington, Mass.-based UniFirst Corp., a uniform and laundry service, for seven serious safety and health violations, including some involving bloodborne pathogen and lead exposure hazards, at its West Caldwell facility. A complaint alleging hazards prompted OSHA's inspection. Proposed penalties total $186,000.

"The violations at this facility compromise the safety and health of UniFirst's workers," said Kris Hoffman, director of OSHA's Parsippany Area Office, which conducted the inspection. "It is vital that the company take appropriate steps to eliminate all identified hazards."

Three willful violations involve a failure to conduct proper training and provide hepatitis B vaccinations, as well as to have engineering and work practice controls in place to eliminate or minimize exposure to bloodborne pathogens. A willful violation is one committed with intentional knowing or voluntary disregard for the law's requirements, or with plain indifference to worker safety and health. The citations carry $165,000 in penalties.

Four serious violations involve a locked emergency door, a lack of training on fire extinguisher use, lead-contaminated surfaces, inadequate training on OSHA's lead standard and not providing gloves to workers exposed to potentially contaminated clothing. A serious violation occurs when there is substantial probability that death or serious physical harm could result from a hazard about which the employer knew or should have known. The citations carry $21,000 in penalties.

"A first step toward a safer, healthier workplace is to develop and implement an illness and injury prevention program in which management and workers proactively identify and eliminate hazardous conditions," said Robert Kulick, OSHA's regional director in New York.

The citations can be viewed at http://www.osha.gov/ooc/citations/UnifirstCorporation_315956458_04_12.pdf*.

UniFirst Corp., which employs 35 workers at the West Caldwell facility, has 15 business days from receipt of the citations to comply, request an informal conference with the OSHA area director, or contest the citations and proposed penalties before the independent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.

To ask questions, obtain compliance assistance, file a complaint, or report workplace hospitalizations, fatalities or situations posing imminent danger to workers, the public should call OSHA's toll-free hotline at 800-321-OSHA (6742) or the agency's Parsippany office at 973-263-1003.

Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, OSHA's role is to promote safe and healthful working conditions for America's working men and women by setting and enforcing standards, and providing training, outreach and education. For more information, visit http://www.osha.gov.

Friday, May 4, 2012

Sidetracked By Drugs

New York Mayor, Michael R. Bloomberg.
New York Mayor, Michael R. Bloomberg. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
The core health care delivery problems that exist in workers' compensation are not being driven by the alleged excess prescriptions of pain relief medication. That is a symptom of a system that has been derailed.

The focus of major employer and insurance initiatives of so-called reform legislation in multiple jurisdictions has been to reduce the delivery of prescriptive pain relief. Actually, that is an enforcement issue only that globally exists in the health care industry. New York's Mayor Michael Bloomberg, is working diligently to identify and database the few prescribers and physicians involved.  A national effort modeled after the New York process would go a long way to curtain excessive and unorthodox prescriptions.

To use the prescription drug abuse issue to attack workers' compensation generally is merely sidetracking the real problem with the medical delivery system which is the global denial of compensability of workers' compensation claims by employers and insurance carriers merely to delay and avoid payment of medical benefits.

The recent decision in Federal Court recognizing RICO violations by an insurance carrier, the employer medical expert, and the employer itself, puts the real focus on the problem.  That decision demonstrates the need to get the workers' compensation train back on the tracks and redirect the system so that it pays benefits to injured workers in an efficient and timely basis.

Tuesday, July 3, 2012

Facebook Photo Admissible As Evidence

An injured worker was denied benefits when an Arkansas Court admitted into evidence Facebook pictures that were posted on line showing him drinking and partying. The worker had alleged that as a result of a hernia, sustained at work, he was in excruciating pain.

The trial court held that the evidence went to the weight to be given his testimony and it was within the province of the Court admit them into evidence. The Court dismissed the injured worker's argument that the Facebook photos "are a disgrace to the dignity of the workers' compensation proceeding and the legal system." The case was dismissed.

Clement v. Johnson's Warehouse Showroom, 2012 Ark. App. 17, 2012 WL 11285 (Ark.App.)

Tuesday, February 7, 2023

Available Workers' Compensation Law 2023 Update

Jon Gelman’s* newly revised and updated treatise on Workers’ Compensation Law is now available from Thomson Reuters®. The treatise is the most complete and research-integrated work on NJ Workers’ Compensation law.

Thursday, May 9, 2019

New Opioid Prescription Regulations

Attorney General Gurbir S. Grewal and the New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs, together with the New Jersey Coordinator for Addiction Responses and Enforcement Strategies ("NJ CARES"), today announced a series of regulatory actions that will advance the State’s battle to end the opioid epidemic, including proposed rules that will expand access to the prevention and treatment of opioid use disorder through telemedicine.

Saturday, May 30, 2020

OSHA's vague COVID-19 reporting guidance

OSHA issued a COVID-19 reporting guidance that lacks a foundation in essential epidemiology as well as legal evidentiary principles for admissibility. It is doubtful that court of law would permit the guidance to be used for the determination of causal relationship.

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Genetics and Workers' Compensation Claims


Genetic predisposition to occupational illness and disease presents a complex issue in workers’ compensation claims and health technology assessment. New methods now permit the identification of individuals who have risk factors establishing a greater propensity for disabling medical conditions.

The challenge of how to use this evidence in the workplace, to create both a safer work environment, while maintaining the privacy of the existence of the workers’ genetic propensity is an on going challenge. Additionally, genetic evidence becomes increasingly important to establish pre-existing and co-existing medical conditions that might reduce or bar recovery in claims for benefits under workers’ compensation acts.

Testimony offered at trial has effective defeated claims.  Evidence has been effective presented to defeat occupational claims, A defense expert testified,"....that studies show almost conclusively that no occupation causes a degenerative disc. It's familial. It's genetic. It has to do with how the DNA forms the disc in embryonic development.’” Allgood v. Parsons Trucking Co., 148 N. C.App. 405 (N.C.App. (2002).

A delicate balance exists between, the ethical, moral and legal use of this evidence. The appropriate use of this information by an employers in assessing risks and benefits in the workplace is challenging. Many tasks at work now include risk factors of a  carcinogenic, mutagenic, and/or genotoxic nature.

NIOSH ‘s recently published report,  Genetics in the Workplace: Implications for Occupational Safety and Health, addresses balancing some of aspects of these issues while focussing on the paramount issue of safety in the workplace. The use of genetic information in occupational safety and health research requires careful attention because of the real or perceived opportunities for the misuse of genetic information. Society in general and workers in particular have concerns that discrimination and lack of opportunity will result from the inappropriate use of genetic information [MacDonald and Williams-Jones 2002; Maltby 2000]. While only sparse or anecdotal information supports this contention, a wide range of workers, legislators, scientists, and public health researchers have concern that such discrimination could occur. Thus, GINA and other regulations were passed to prevent the potential misuse and abuse of genetic information in the workplace. Examples of safeguards include rules and practices for maintaining privacy and confidentiality, prohibition of discrimination, and support of a worker’s right of self- determination (autonomy) with regard to genetic information.”


Click here to read more about occupational illness and genetics.

Wednesday, June 5, 2013

More Regulation Called for of State Opt-Out Plans

A recently published report by the New Street Group, sponsored by Sedgwick  calls for the intervention of state regulation over workers' compensation opt-out plans. Recognizing the gray line between State and Federal insurance programs, the report concludes that the Federal  and state courts may ultimately decide the direction of workers' compensation in the US.
By Peter Rousmaniere and Jack Roberts


Read more about "opt-out" plans and workers' compensation
May 07, 2013
Governor Mary Fallin today signed into law Senate Bill 1062, a bill that reforms the workers' compensation system in Oklahoma by removing it from the judicial system and making it an administrative process. The bill, by ...
Jun 03, 2013
The Electronic Privacy Information Center, or EPIC, filed a lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security to establish that all air travelers have the right to opt out of airport body scanners. In additional to the privacy ...
Jan 19, 2013
The US Transportation Safety Administration (TSA) is following the lead on many other countries, including the European Community, and is removing all Backscatter machines from service. While not admitting to the radiation ...
Nov 16, 2012
An activist movement is encouraging individuals to opt-out of going through airport x-ray scanners during Thanksgiving travel. Health concerns have been raised over the use of machines. Many United States unions have ...


Related articles

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

The Urgent Need for Workers Compensation Flu Pandemic Planning

The 2009 influenza pandemic (flu) has created a new framework of acts and regulations to respond the World Health Organization’s (WHO) phase 6 pandemic alert. Governmentally imposed employment disruptions resulting from regulatory work disruptions to prevent the spread of disease maybe massive. While workers’ compensation was envisioned as a summary and remedial social insurance program, the challenges facing the workers’ compensation system to deliver benefits as promised may be seriously burdened.


There has been a global reaction to the 2008 influenza pandemic. On April 25, 2009, the WHO director-General Dr. Margaret Chen declared the H1N1 virus outbreak as a “Public Health Emergency of International Concern.” The international declaration indicated that a coordinated international response was potentially necessary to prevent curtail the spread of the disease that was perceived as a public health risk. Recommendations to restrict both trade and travel may follow.


The United States has structured its response on both a State and Federal level to the 2009 influenza alert. The Public Health Service Act (PHS) permits the Secretary of Health and Human Service (HHS) to access a special emergency fund, allows or the use of unapproved medical treatments and tests, and allows waiver of certain reimbursement of Medicare and Medicaid expenses, and waives penalties and sanctions for violation of the HIPAA Privacy Rule requirements. Additionally, the President may issue an emergency declaration under The Stafford Act to co-ordinate emergency relief under State and Federal programs, ie. use and distribution of anti-viral medications.


The Federal government has sweeping powers under the PHS that could disrupt employment throughout the country. Recommendations for school closings will impact children and staff well beyond the approximate 700 facilities that were closed in the Spring of 2009 during the H1N1 initial outbreak. The Federal government under the PHS has authority to quarantine (interstate and border) and to isolate. An Executive Order (E.O. 13375, April 2005) enumerates the “quarantainable diseases.” Travel restrictions may be imposed to limit the spread of a communicable disease. Employees may not be permitted to board flights under either voluntary airline restrictions or through the Federally imposed “Do Not Board” lists.


These closings and restrictions have raised issues as to what programs, if any, will be able to provide benefits to the employees because of the involuntary nature of the closings and disruptions. A recent Harvard School of Public Health study reveals that 80% of businesses foresee severe problems in maintaining operations if there is an outbreak. The workers’ compensation system could be requested to provide temporary disability benefits for occupational disease absences on a massive scale never before experienced. Pre-emption by superseding emergency regulatory actions may curtail employment that will trigger the implementation of State workers’ compensation benefits. The employer and the workers’ compensation insurance carriers will be required to pay temporary disability and medical benefits as a direct consequence of efforts to prevent the spread of a communicable disease. The carefully crafted employee-employer notification structure integrated into the workers’ compensation system may be partially or entirely disrupted by the consequences and chaos of the global health emergency.


Workers’ Compensation claims arising out of the influenza pandemic of 2009 will need to fit into the convoluted framework statutory acts and regulation. Reimbursement from the usual collateral third-party reimbursement sources may be restricted. In addition to the Doctrine of Sovereign Immunity, enjoyed by the Federal and State governments, other legislation including The “Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act" (PREP Act) limits liability of others under certain specific emergency circumstances.


The enormity of the Pandemic presents a new and novel challenge to the system and one that must be considered by both Federal and State planners. Workers’ Compensation programs have adapted to emergencies before including natural disasters and terrorist attacks. The urgency of the situation requires that the system be vaccinated now.


Friday, February 12, 2021

Just Published - Workers' Compensation Law 2021 COVID-19 Update

Jon Gelman’s* newly revised and the updated treatise on Workers’ Compensation Law has been published by Thomson Reuters®. The treatise is the most complete and research integrated work available on NJ Workers’ Compensation law. Updated annually for over 35 years, this body of work provides practical tips, objective analysis, and academic support for the workers' compensation community.

Monday, August 12, 2013

3 Responses for “What the Recent Data Breach Says About the State of Health IT”

The privacy of medical records is an essential component of the workers' compensation system. As the use of electronic records becomes more commonplace the need to maintain the records in a secure format becomes increasingly critical.  Today's post was shared by The Health Care Blog and comes from thehealthcareblog.com By David Do, MD

Earlier this month officials at Oregon Health Sciences University discovered that residents in several departments were storing patient information on Google Drive, and had been doing so for the past two years. Given They treated this discovery as a breach of privacy and notified 3000 patients about the incident.

While I don’t condone the storage of patient information on unapproved services like Gmail or Google Drive, this incident pretty much highlights the sorry state of information systems within the hospital and the unfulfilled need by physicians for tools that facilitate workflow and patient care.

It says something that the Oregon residents felt compelled to take such a drastic action. I don’t know what punishment – if any – those responsible were given by administrators for their “crimes.” I’ll leave it to readers to make up their own minds about the wisdom of the unauthorized workaround and the appropriateness of any punishment. But I do know that the message the incident sends is a very clear one.

We’re screwing this up. There is really no earthly reason why it should be any more difficult to share a patient record than it is to share a Word doc, a Powerpoint or yes, even a cloud-based Google Drive spreadsheet.

Why the Breach Happened
What’s going on here? Let’s say I admit a patient to the hospital.  Our friend was hospitalized here just last month, and like many patients, he has dementia...

[Click here to see the rest of this article]

Friday, June 21, 2019

AI and Workers' Compensation: Who is Watching the Machine?

Artificial intelligence [AI] is the new challenging frontier in the administration of workers’ compensation benefits. While there are cost savings benefits that will be achieved through deep learning and machine intervention there are also serious ethical concerns coming to the forefront as this new technology evolves. 

Deep machine learning is complicated and it is in an ambitious goal. The result may afford a good prediction, but it lacks an explanation of "why" in many instances. 

The potential decrease costs in both administration and payment of workers’ compensation benefits have been alluded to in advertisements of software manufacturers. Already vendors are claiming reductions including: a 5% reduction in claims cost; a 50% decrease in the cost of medical-only claims; and a 25% to 60% reduction in attorney involvement. 

AI programs transfer the decision-making role onto a computer algorithm rather than a human being. In others words, the plight of the injured worker is not left to the decision making capacity of an adjuster, but rather a computer utilizing logarithms. The logarithms can be biased concerning such stereotypes as: racial, demographic, genetic, gender, economic, and/or religious. AI can be utilized to admit or deny claims, restrict temporary disability benefits and direct medical care. 

The lack of privacy in the vast amount of data flowing into machine learning programs continues unabated. Some of the data is distributed without consent and without transparency. How much of this data is used by AI programs remains unknown. The process is unexplainable. 

Computer based learning systems have available vast amounts of data, from unknown sources, that form a gold mine of information available. Insurance carriers and employers can use this data to reduce claims costs and ultimate payouts. The data grows daily from multiple sources both with in the workers’ compensation community as well as from collateral information resources. In the information world the availability of electronic information grows constantly. 

The deployment of artificial intelligence programs that involve deep machine learning raise significant issues involving questions as to the explainability of the decision making process. The Explainability of Artificial intelligence [XAI] including the algorithms employed in the decision making process is problematic. An overriding question is who is responsible for the potential harm since an individual cannot sue a computer. 

The ethical dilemma created is that it is difficult to regulate logarithms. The federal government has taken the lead on this challenging issue. The Defense Advancement Research Projects Agency [DARPA] assesses how the components of AI can be explained and applied in a responsible manner. The components include: how rich, complex and subtle information is perceived; how the machine learns the information within an environment; how the information is abstracted to create new meanings; and how artificial intelligence can reason to plan and decide. 

The integrity of workers’ compensation is being challenged by AI systems that lack explainability. The goal of employers and or insurance companies in utilizing AI for cost-claim reduction is noble. The playing field must remain balanced and the right to “due process” in workers compensation programs needs to be preserved. The oversight by governance, policy, and rules concerning XAI should be utilized to maintain the integrity of workers’ compensation programs.


…. 
Jon L. Gelman of Wayne NJ is the author of NJ Workers’ Compensation Law (West-Thomson-Reuters) and co-author of the national treatise, Modern Workers’ Compensation Law (West-Thomson-Reuters). For over 4 decades the Law Offices of Jon L Gelman 1.973.696.7900jon@gelmans.com has been representing injured workers and their families who have suffered occupational accidents and illnesses.

Thursday, May 7, 2015

NJ State Bar Association Opposes Workers' Compensation COLA Bill

"The New Jersey State Bar Association respectfully has concerns with S-929 (Sweeney) which concerns certain workers' compensation supplemental benefits. The New Jersey State Bar Association opposes this legislation in order to preserve the “Reverse Offset” provision in New Jersey, visa vie Social Security, which provides for a reduction of the workers' compensation benefit of a worker also receiving disability insurance. Enacting this legislation has the potential of harming the economic integrity of New Jersey’s current cost effective system by allowing for a double recovery of disability benefits and workers’ compensation benefits, which will in turn increase the cost of doing business in New Jersey. A potential alternative that would limit these adverse consequences would be to limit the application of the bill to survivor/death benefits. For the reasons set for above, the New Jersey State Bar Association respectfully opposes this bill."

Thursday, September 1, 2011

Who Is Paying the Premiums for Workers Compensation Anyway

Employes have been subject to "give backs" and "add on" costs for decades, but now employers want to shift the cost of workers compensation insurance to employees. The intent of the workers' compensation act was to shift the costs of workers' compensation coverage to the consumer of the product and/or user of the service and not the employee.


A recent Massachusetts Judge reiterated that principle, but left open the question as to whether the employee could consensually contract to accept the costs of workers' compensation coverage. If this occurs, it is ultimately a "deal breaker."


Cost shifting of workers' compensation coverage is a dangerous precedent going to the heart of the initial promise made to workers in creating the system. Is is against  "public policy," and defeats the Legislative intent of the act. While the economy is soft and the workers' compensation system in a weakened condition it is not time to abandon ship unless a more creative approach for reform of the entire system comes into play. As jobs remain scarce, the process would not be consensual, but merely coercion. Shifting the cost would ultimately remove the deterrent effect for unsafe workplaces, and yet is another reason why employers and ultimately consumers should remain responsible for workers compensation  costs.


See: Awuah v. Coverall North America, Inc.,--- N.E.2d ----, Mass. , 2011 WL 3805255, Mass., August 31, 2011 (NO. SJC-10829)

For over 3 decades the Law Offices of Jon L. Gelman  1.973.696.7900  jon@gelmans.com have been representing injured workers and their families who have suffered occupational accidents and illnesses.

Tuesday, September 5, 2023

Implementing AI for Workers’ Compensation Law Firms and Insurance Companies

Artificial intelligence [AI] opens new frontiers for workers’ compensation law firms and insurance companies. Last week, Google announced new applications that will vastly expand how workers’ compensation claims can be serviced, managed, and supported.

Wednesday, March 23, 2016

Expectations Must Adapt to Change

In the "old days" the US workers' compensation system,  meet or "exceeded exceptions." Looking backward we recognize an aggressive and dedicated work ethic, that the government, private industry and labor," managed to embrace into a "Grand Bargain" called Workers' Compensation. 

Times have changed. In the past the corporate and executive workplace was a formal "tie and jacket" environment. Seasoned member always gripe how things have changed for the worse and long for a return to the comforting and familiar "good old times." 

Thursday, June 9, 2016

NJ Supreme Court Allows COLA Pension Freeze

LaVECCHIA, J., writing for a majority of the Court. In this appeal, the Court considers whether the 2011 suspension of State pension cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs), L. 2011, c. 78, contravened a term of the contract right granted under the earlier enacted “non-forfeitable right” statute, L. 1997, c. 113 (presently codified as N.J.S.A. 43:3C-9.5).

FL Supreme Court Rules Yet Another Part of the Work Comp Law Unconstitutional

The Florid Supreme Court today ruled yet another part of the Florida Workers' Compensation Act unconstitutional. The cut off of benefits provision was declared unconstitutional. The future of workers' compensation law in FL is now uncertain.