Copyright

(c) 2010-2024 Jon L Gelman, All Rights Reserved.
Showing posts with label Social Security Reverse Offset. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Social Security Reverse Offset. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 14, 2019

Governor Conditionally Vetoes NJ Supplemental Benefits Bill

The NJ supplemental workers' compensation bill has been conditional vetoed by NJ Governor Murphy. In the conditional veto message the Governor notes that the legislation's unintended consequences would jeopardize NJ's "reverse offset," shift the cost responsibility and not provide an economic benefit to the injured workers. The NJ Senate then took action.

Wednesday, September 5, 2018

Totally Injured Workers Maybe Getting an Increase in Benefits

The proposed Trump Administration 2019 Budget (p. 115) may allow NJ workers’ compensation beneficiaries to receive an increase in benefits. By eliminating the Social Security “reverse offset,” totally and permanently injured NJ workers will receive a triennial annual COLA increase.

“The Budget includes a re-proposal to eliminate reverse offsets in fifteen states where Workers' Compensation (WC) benefits and temporary disability insurance benefits (TDI) are offset instead of DI benefits."

Thursday, May 7, 2015

NJ State Bar Association Opposes Workers' Compensation COLA Bill

"The New Jersey State Bar Association respectfully has concerns with S-929 (Sweeney) which concerns certain workers' compensation supplemental benefits. The New Jersey State Bar Association opposes this legislation in order to preserve the “Reverse Offset” provision in New Jersey, visa vie Social Security, which provides for a reduction of the workers' compensation benefit of a worker also receiving disability insurance. Enacting this legislation has the potential of harming the economic integrity of New Jersey’s current cost effective system by allowing for a double recovery of disability benefits and workers’ compensation benefits, which will in turn increase the cost of doing business in New Jersey. A potential alternative that would limit these adverse consequences would be to limit the application of the bill to survivor/death benefits. For the reasons set for above, the New Jersey State Bar Association respectfully opposes this bill."