Trying to hold onto a job while caring for a family member is a tough juggling act. Caregivers sometimes have to arrive late or leave early, cut back to part-time work, and decline travel or promotions. For women, these competing responsibilities may prove particularly perilous, a study recently published in the Journal of Applied Gerontology suggests. Women who are caregivers are also significantly less likely to be in the labor force, compared to women who are not caregivers. Yet for men, caregiving has no impact on employment status. The authors, two professors of social work, unearthed these patterns in national data gathered in 2004 in the Health and Retirement Study. They looked at participants aged 50 to 61, more than 5,100 people, roughly a third of them family caregivers. About 4 percent were caring for a spouse, 15 percent for a grandchild and about 20 percent for a parent; some took care of more than one relative. (Every study seems to use a different definition of caregiving. In this case, the researchers defined it as caring for parents or grandchildren for at least 100 hours over two years; spousal caregivers had no minimum time requirement.) As in virtually every other study, women were more likely to care for parents. Seven percent of the total sample assisted with parents’ personal needs, compared to 3.6 percent of men. Close to 16 percent of men helped parents with chores, errands and transportation, while more than 20 percent of... |
Copyright
(c) 2010-2024 Jon L Gelman, All Rights Reserved.
Showing posts with label Journal of Applied Gerontology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Journal of Applied Gerontology. Show all posts
Friday, November 22, 2013
Work, Women and Caregiving
Monday, October 14, 2013
California To Regulate New Home Care
Injured workers have been receiving home health care at increased rates as hospitals and rehabilitation cnters are releasing recuperating workers quickly under discharge protocols. Today's post is shared from the NY Times. California has become the latest state to tighten oversight of home health agencies that provide custodial care — help with bathing, dressing, toileting and other basic tasks — to older adults and people with disabilities. Gov. Jerry Brown on Sunday signed the Home Care Services Consumer Protection Act of 2013, which will require agencies to conduct background checks on workers, provide five hours of training, list aides in an online registry and obtain a license certifying their compliance with basic standards. Home health agencies had opposed the bill’s training and background check requirements. The governor vetoed a similar bill last year; this year’s version dropped a requirement that aides hired from referral agencies or directly by seniors get background checks and be listed in the online registry. Mr. Brown also asked for a delay in putting the legislation in place until January 2016. Critics have long argued that the home care industry has been too lightly regulated. According to a new study in the Journal of Applied Gerontology, only 15 states require training for home care workers or on-site supervision of their activities. Altogether, 29 states mandate that agencies be licensed. The move to tighten industry... |
Related articles
- Home Care Workers Win Wage and Overtime Protection (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Ideas of Federal Panel on Long-Term Care Don't Cover Costs (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Work Comp Steps Up to ACA (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Study: Calif. workers compensation overhaul too new to parse (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Senior Care Workers Are Victims of Wage Violations (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Senior Care Workers Are Victims of Wage Violations (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Bill limiting workers' comp claims by athletes is sent to governor (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)