Copyright

(c) 2010-2024 Jon L Gelman, All Rights Reserved.
Showing posts with label Medical device. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Medical device. Show all posts

Sunday, May 3, 2015

Synchromed II Implantable Infusion Pump Systems: FDA Consent Decree To Limit Use

Medtronic, Inc. cited for manufacturing violations

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced today the filing of a consent decree against Medtronic, Inc., and two of the company’s officers—S. Omar Ishrak and Thomas M. Tefft —for repeatedly failing to correct violations, related to the manufacture of Synchromed II Implantable Infusion Pump Systems, medical devices that deliver medication to treat primary or metastatic cancer, chronic pain and severe spasticity. These violations occurred at the company’s Neuromodulation facilities in Columbia Heights, Minnesota, where the devices are manufacture.

The consent decree cites violations of the quality system regulation for medical devices, which requires manufacturers to have processes in place to assure that the design, manufacture and distribution of a device allows for its safe us

The legal action requires the company to stop manufacturing, designing and distributing new Synchromed II Implantable Infusion Pump Systems except in very limited cases, such as when a physician determines that the Synchromed II Implantable Infusion Pump System is medically necessary for a patient’s treatment.

The consent decree also requires Medtronic to retain a third-party expert to help develop and submit plans to the FDA to correct violations. The consent decree will remain in effect until the FDA has determined that Medtronic has met all the provisions listed in the consent decree.

Once Medtronic receives permission from the FDA to resume the design, manufacture and distribution of these products, the company must continue to submit audit reports so the agency can verify the company’s compliance. In addition to these audits, the FDA will monitor the company’s activities through its own inspections.

The FDA first approved the Synchromed II Implantable Infusion Pump Systems in 2004, and first identified problems with the manufacture of these pumps in 2006. These problems can result in over- or under-infusion or a delay in therapy for patients.

Between 2006 and 2013, FDA investigators conducted five inspections at Medtronic’s Neuromodulation facilities, resulting in three warning letters notifying the company of major violations. The violations included inadequate processes for identifying, investigating, and correcting quality problems with the Synchromed II Implantable Infusion Pump Systems; failure to document design changes; and failure to ensure that finished products meet design specifications.

“The FDA expects that all patients will be treated with safe, effective and high-quality medical devices,” said Jan Welch, acting director of the Office of Compliance in the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health. “We will continue to stop distribution of devices made by firms that fall short of regulatory requirements.”

Patients who are implanted with a Synchromed II Implantable Infusion Pump System should maintain regular follow-up appointments with their physicians. Patients who experience a change or return of symptoms, or hear a device alarm, should contact their physician immediately.

The FDA, an agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, protects the public health by assuring the safety and effectiveness of human and veterinary drugs, biological products for human use, and medical devices. The agency also is responsible for the safety and security of our nation’s food supply, cosmetics, dietary supplements, products that give off electronic radiation, and for regulating tobacco products.


Thursday, June 26, 2014

FDA Issues Guidances for Industry on Social Media

Today's article shared from Thomas Abrams

Ongoing changes in technology transform medical products – and the ways that both patients and health care providers learn about those products. In today’s world, in addition to traditional sources of medical product information, patients and health care providers regularly get information about FDA-regulated medical products through social media and other Internet sources, and those technologies continue to evolve. But regardless of the Internet source used to communicate about medical products, the public health is best served by clear, accurate, truthful and non-misleading information about them.

That’s why the agency has proposed two draft guidances for industry with recommendations to help manufacturers and their representatives accurately communicate online about prescription drugs and medical devices.

These documents strive to ensure that the information provided by drug and device companies is accurate and will help patients to make well-informed decisions in consultation with their health care providers.

Our first guidance provides recommendations for the presentation of risk and benefit information for prescription drugs or medical devices using Internet/social media sources with character space limitations, such as Twitter and the paid search results links on Google and Yahoo. These recommendations address the presentation of both benefit information and risk information in this setting. We understand that...

[Click here to see the rest of this post]

Monday, January 6, 2014

CMS Takes a New Direction in the Proposed MSP Appeal Process

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services (CMS) has proposed rules for the Medicare Secondary Payer (MSP) appeals process that will target the “applicable plan” as the primary responsible party for recovery. 

Medicare, in pursuing recovery directly from the applicable plan, removes the beneficiary, as well as the provider or supplier, as the responsible party to initial a re-determination and all subsequent levels of the administrative process that could culminate in judicial review.

Docket ID:CMS-2013-0270
Topic(s):Administrative Practices and Procedures, Health Facilities, Health Professions, Kidney Diseases, Medical Devices, Medicare, Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements, Rural Areas, X-Rays
Document Type:Proposed Rule
Received Date:Dec 27, 2013
Start-End Page:78802 - 78807
Comment Start Date:Dec 27, 2013
Comment Due Date:Feb 25, 2014


Friday, November 22, 2013

New Scrutiny for Medical Devices

Today's post was shared by FairWarning and comes from well.blogs.nytimes.com

Metal-on-metal replacement hips remain high-risk, but other devices are to be downgraded.

Metal-on-metal replacement hips remain high-risk, but other devices are to be downgraded.

Wayne Schneider’s heart stopped beating late last year while the Minneapolis paramedic was out on an emergency call.

Another medic performed CPR for a few minutes, and then used a medical device that delivered cardiac compressions mechanically for 64 minutes, until Mr. Schneider’s heart started beating normally on its own.

“I’m not sure people would have been able to sustain manual CPR for so long,” said Mr. Schneider, 57. “I’m a lucky guy.”

Friday, November 1, 2013

As Robot-Assisted Surgery Expands, Are Patients And Providers Getting Enough Information?

Today's post is shared from kaiserhealthnews.org.

The use of robotic surgical systems is expanding rapidly, but hospitals, patients and regulators may not be getting enough information to determine whether the high tech approach is worth its cost.

Problems resulting from surgery using robotic equipment—including deaths—have been reported late, inaccurately or not at all to the Food and Drug Administration, according to one study.
The study, published in the Journal for Healthcare Quality earlier this year, focused on incidents involving Intuitive Surgical’s da Vinci Robotic Surgical System over nearly 12 years, scrubbing through several data bases to find troubled outcomes. Researchers found 245 incidents reported to the FDA, including 71 deaths and 174 nonfatal injuries. But they also found eight cases in which reporting fell short, including five cases in which no FDA report was filed at all.

The FDA assesses and approves products based on reported device-related complications. If a medical device malfunctions, hospitals are required to report the incident to the manufacturer, which then reports it to the agency. The FDA, in turn, creates a report for its Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database.

The use of surgical robots has grown rapidly since it was first approved for laparoscopic surgery (a type of surgery that uses smaller incisions than in traditional surgery) by the FDA in 2000. Between 2007 and 2011 the number of da Vinci systems installed increased by 75 percent in the United...
[Click here to see the rest of this post]

Thursday, October 31, 2013

Aviation Safety: F.A.A. Allows Use of Electronic Devices Throughout Flights

Finally, the US F.A.A. has taken a step forward in making the airplane flight experience a better one. For decades, passengers and crew have been battling flight attendants over turning off and stowing personal electronic devices (PED). With so many passengers and crew virtually attached to the Internet for  data, news and other media electronically, it was inevitable that PED use would be allowed on flights. Now the airlines will adjust its electronics to create a profit center for the sale of Internet and network access. The burden has also shifted to US airlines to commit to a testing program, and establish protocols for stowing devices. Today's post is shared from nytimes.com .  

The change will most likely take effect before the end of the year, the F.A.A. said. Rules for cellphone use are set by the Federal Communications Commission, and unlikely to change soon, because of the nature of the cellphone system.

The administrator of the F.A.A., Michael P. Huerta, said he expected that, with rare exceptions, airlines would allow the use of tablets, MP3 players and smartphones in “airplane mode,” with their cell network connections turned off. The airlines will have to conduct tests on their equipment and submit the results to the F.A.A. for approval, he said.

Soon after Mr. Huerta spoke, Delta and JetBlue announced that they would submit a plan for passengers to use electronics in flight.

The change would not be universal, Mr. Huerta said....
[Click here to see the rest of this post]

Thursday, October 24, 2013

US Inspector General Wants More Disclosure By Back Surgeons Who Implant their Own Devices

Back surgery is a big business and the selling of implanted medical devices are costly transactions. The US Office of Inspector General has issued a report today that their should be more disclosure to patients when back surgeons implant their own devices.

"PODs have a substantial presence in the spinal device market. PODs
provided devices used in nearly a fifth of the spinal surgeries billed to
Medicare in FY 2011, and over a third of the hospitals in our sample
purchased spinal devices from PODs. Many of these hospitals began
purchasing from PODs after 2009. Also, few hospitals in our sample
required physicians to disclose their ownership in device companies,
such as PODs, to their patients.

"In FY 2012, hospitals that purchased from PODs performed more spinal
surgeries and had slightly more complex spinal surgery caseloads than
hospitals that did not purchase from PODs. After they began purchasing
from PODs, hospitals experienced increased rates of growth in the
number of spinal surgeries performed as compared to the growth rate for
hospitals overall. Determining the cause for the increased rate of spinal
procedures was beyond the scope of our review.

"In addition, our findings raise questions about PODs’ claims that their
devices cost less than other suppliers. Within the device categories we
examined, PODs’ devices either cost the same as or more than devices
from companies not owned by physicians. This, combined with the
volume of spinal surgeries we found at hospitals that purchase from
PODs, may increase the cost of spinal surgery to the Medicare program
and beneficiaries over time. Further, hospitals inconsistently required
physicians to disclose ownership interests in PODs to either the hospitals
or their patients. Thus the ability of hospitals and patients to identify
potential conflicts of interest among these providers is reduced.

"The Sunshine Act may improve the ability of hospitals and patients to
identify physicians’ investment in device companies. The Act will
require most PODs to report to CMS all physician ownership and
investment interests.18 CMS plans to list these companies and their
payments on a publicly available Web site.

Click here to read the complete report.

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Knee Replacement Medical Device Recalled

The US Food and Drug Administration  (FDA) has notified healthcare professionals of a Class I recall of the LPS Diaphyseal Sleeve, a manufactured medical device used in human knee replacement surgery.
It has been found that The LPS Diaphyseal Sleeve to Diaphyseal Sleeve Base taper connection may not be sufficient to accommodate potential physiologic loads that may be transferred to the junction during normal gait activities by some patients. This may result in fracture of the sleeve at the taper joint which may also lead to loss of function or loss of limb, infection, compromised soft tissue or death.
The device was manufactured by: DePuy Orthopaedic, Inc, a company owned by Johnson and Johnson.

Friday, August 27, 2010

Hip Implants Recalled Due to Failure

Johnson and Johnson has recalled 2 Hip Implants because of failure. The two implants were made by the DePuy Orthopaedics unit of Johnson and Johnson. The decision to withdrawn the products was based upon the fact that many patients require a second hip replacement because of product failure.
DePuy release a statement today that they two products being recalled were: the ASR XL Acetabular System, a hip socket used in traditional hip replacement, and the ASR Hip Resurfacing System, a partial hip replacement that involves placing a metal cap on the ball of the femur, a method intended to preserve more bone. There about 93,000 of the defective appliances that have been implanted worldwide.

For over two years the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been besieged with complaints about the failure of the devices and painful surgery to replace them.


The office of Jon L. Gelman has advocated for consumer rights and has helped those who have unfortunately received defective medical devices. Please call 1-973-696-7900 or e-mail for further information.

Workers' Compensation and Joint Replacement