Copyright

(c) 2010-2024 Jon L Gelman, All Rights Reserved.
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query deaths. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query deaths. Sort by date Show all posts

Monday, December 30, 2013

Global cancer burden rises to 14.1 million new cases in 2012: Marked increase in breast cancers must be addressed

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the specialized cancer agency of the World Health Organization, today released the latest data on cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence worldwide.1 The new version of IARC’s online database, GLOBOCAN 2012, provides the most recent estimates for 28 types of cancer in 184 countries worldwide and offers a comprehensive overview of the global cancer burden. 
GLOBOCAN 2012 reveals striking patterns of cancer in women and highlights that priority should be given to cancer prevention and control measures for breast and cervical cancers globally. 
Global burden rises to 14.1 million new cases and 8.2 million cancer deaths in 2012 
According to GLOBOCAN 2012, an estimated 14.1 million new cancer cases and 8.2 million cancer-related deaths occurred in 2012, compared with 12.7 million and 7.6 million, respectively, in 2008. Prevalence estimates for 2012 show that there were 32.6 million people (over the age of 15 years) alive who had had a cancer diagnosed in the previous five years. 
The most commonly diagnosed cancers worldwide were those of the lung (1.8 million, 13.0% of the total), breast (1.7 million, 11.9%), and colorectum (1.4 million, 9.7%). The most common causes of cancer death were cancers of the lung (1.6 million, 19.4% of the total), liver (0.8 million, 9.1%), and stomach (0.7 million, 8.8%). 
Projections based on the GLOBOCAN 2012 estimates predict a substantive increase to 19.3 million new cancer cases per year by 2025, due to growth and ageing of the global population. More than half of all cancers (56.8%) and cancer deaths (64.9%) in 2012 occurred in less developed regions of the world, and these proportions will increase further by 2025. 
Sharp rise in breast cancer worldwide 
In 2012, 1.7 million women were diagnosed with breast cancer and there were 6.3 million women alive who had been diagnosed with breast cancer in the previous five years. Since the 2008 estimates, breast cancer incidence has increased by more than 20%, while mortality has increased by 14%. Breast cancer is also the most common cause of cancer death among women (522 000 deaths in 2012) and the most frequently diagnosed cancer among women in 140 of 184 countries worldwide. It now represents one in four of all cancers in women. 
“Breast cancer is also a leading cause of cancer death in the less developed countries of the world. This is partly because a shift in lifestyles is causing an increase in incidence, and partly 

Monday, February 4, 2013

World Cancer Day 2013

1.5 million premature cancer deaths could be prevented per year if targets set to reduce NCDs are met by 2025

On World Cancer Day, UICC and International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) reveal real-life impact of achieving goal

Monday 4 February 2013 – World Cancer Day: Geneva, Switzerland – The Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) today announced that 1.5 million lives which would be lost to cancer, could be saved per year if decisive measures are taken to achieve the World Health Organization’s (WHO) ‘25 by 25’ target; to reduce premature deaths due to non-communicable diseases (NCDs) by 25% by 2025.[i]

Currently, 7.6 million people die from cancer worldwide every year, out of which, 4 million people die prematurely (aged 30 to 69 years).i So unless urgent action is taken to raise awareness about the disease and to develop practical strategies to address cancer, by 2025, this is projected to increase to an alarming 6 million premature cancer deaths per year.

“The estimate of 1.5 million lives lost per year to cancer that could be prevented must serve to galvanise our efforts in implementing the World Health Organization’s (WHO) ‘25 by 25’ target,” said Dr Christopher Wild, Director of IARC. “There is now a need for a global commitment to help drive advancements in policy and encourage implementation of comprehensive National Cancer Control Plans. If we are to succeed in this, we have a collective responsibility to support low- and middle-income countries who are tackling a cancer epidemic with insufficient resources.”

The 1.5 million lives lost per year represent 25% of the estimated 6 million premature cancer deaths that will occur by 2025, and the 6 million figure is itself based on population projections of current numbers and aging.[1]

Tuesday, July 2, 2013

New Vital Signs Report How has the prescription painkiller overdose epidemic grown in women

The prescription painkiller epidemic is killing more women than ever before. New data shows prescription painkiller overdose deaths among women have skyrocketed. Since 1999, the percentage increase in deaths was more than 400 percent among women compared to 265 percent in men.

"About 18 women die every day of a prescription painkiller overdose in the US, more than 6,600 deaths in 2010. Prescription painkiller overdoses are an under-recognized and growing problem for women."

To read more about this report click here: US CDC

Click here to read "Press Release: Prescription Painkiller Epidemic Among Women"

Read more about painkillers and workers' compensation:
Oct 28, 2009
A pharmacy dispensed narcotic painkillers to a Patricia Copening, 35 year old doctor's office receptionist, who killed a 21 year old man in a fatal Las Vegas accident. A case is pending against the seven pharmacies (Wal-Mart, ...
Jun 18, 2013
Labels: Drugs, opioids, pain killers, Prescription medication, workers compensation. Posted by Jon Gelman at Tuesday, June 18, 2013 · Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook · Newer Post Older Post Home ...
Oct 14, 2011
Researchers from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report that Schedule II prescription painkillers, like oxycodone, today cause more drug overdose deaths than cocaine and heroin combined. Oxycodone and ...
Jun 21, 2013
When a physician overprescribes painkillers and the patient dies, it's criminal. Similarly, when a workers' compensation insurance carrier acts the same way, it should be a criminal act,” said Singer. To read the entire letter to ...

Saturday, June 7, 2008

Hispanic Workers Have High Death Rates


The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has again reported higher death dates for Hispanic workers in the United States. Hispanic workers are one of the fastest growing segments in the US workforce and their death rate has been reported as consistently high.

Work-related injury deaths among Hispanic workers during 1992-2006 totaled 11,202 which equates to 13% of the entire US work-related deaths during that timeframe. Of that number 67% of the Hispanics who lost their lives during the years 2003-2006 were foreign born which is an increase of 52% from 1992.

While the highest number of deaths of Hispanic workers were reported 2003-2006 in California (773 deaths), the highest rates were in South Carolina (22.8 per 100,000 Hispanic workers.)

Friday, January 22, 2021

National Strategy for The COVID-19 Response and Pandemic Preparedness

“Our national strategy will be driven by scientists and public health experts who will regularly speak directly to you, free from political interference as they make decisions strictly on science and public health alone.”  President Joe Biden, January 21. 2021

Friday, April 6, 2012

Heart Disease Linked to Asbestos Exposure

The occupational exposure to asbestos fiber has now been linked to fatal heart disease. A recent report associates asbestos exposure at work to a higher risk of dying from cardiovascular disease.

Cardiovascular disease mortality among British asbestos workers (1971–2005)
Anne-Helen Harding,  Andrew Darnton,  John Osman, Occup Environ Med oemed-2011-100313 Published Online First: 2 April 2012doi:10.1136/oemed-2011-100313

"Objectives Asbestos is an inflammatory agent, and there is evidence that inflammatory processes are involved in the development of cardiovascular disease. Whether asbestos is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease has not been established. The objective of this study was to investigate cardiovascular disease mortality in a large cohort of workers occupationally exposed to asbestos.

"Methods Cardiovascular disease mortality in a cohort of 98 912 asbestos workers, with median follow-up of 19 years, was analysed. Unadjusted and smoking-adjusted standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated. The association between indicators of asbestosexposure and mortality was analysed with Poisson regression models, for deaths occurring during the period 1971–2005.

"Results Altogether 15 557 deaths from all causes, 1053 deaths from cerebrovascular disease and 4185 deaths from ischaemic heart disease (IHD) occurred during follow-up. There was statistically significant excess mortality from cerebrovascular disease (SMR: men 1.63, women 2.04) and IHD (SMR: men 1.39, women 1.89). Job and birth cohort were associated with the risk of cerebrovascular and IHD mortality in the Poisson regression model including sex, age, smoking status, job, cohort and duration of exposure. For IHD only, duration of exposure was also statistically significant in this model.

"Conclusions Cerebrovascular and IHD mortality was significantly higher among theseasbestos workers than in the general population and within the cohort mortality was associated with indicators of asbestos exposure. These findings provide some evidence that occupational exposure to asbestos was associated with cardiovascular disease mortality in this group of workers.

.....
For over 3 decades the Law Offices of Jon L. Gelman 1.973.696.7900 jon@gelmans.com have been representing injured workers and their families who have suffered work related accident and injuries.


Related articles

Wednesday, November 20, 2013

Drug overdose deaths have quadrupled since 1980

The Workers' Compensation system is embroiled in a debate over use of pain medications. As I noted before, the problem of prescription pain medication and the abuse of medical prescribers, Is not limited to Worker's Compensation alone. The problem is systemic in the medical delivery system throughout the United States and it is foolish to think that it is only an exclusive issue two of Worker's Compensation claims. What is actually occurring, is that the insurance carriers and employers in Worker's Compensation, are utilizing this issue to reduce the delivery of medical benefits at the cost of damaging the very Basic requirements of a Worker's Compensation system. Today's post was shared by RWJF PublicHealth and comes from knowmore.washingtonpost.com

Drug overdose deaths have quadrupled since 1980
Drug overdose deaths have quadrupled since 1980
Since 1980, the number of us who die of drug overdoses has quadrupled. Most of these deaths now result from prescription drugs, especially painkillers. “The dichotomy between good drugs prescribed by doctors and bad drugs sold on the street is just bad science,” one doctor told The New York Times a couple of years back.
The really upsetting maps above show this change over the decade that ended in 2009. Appalachia and New Mexico, as popular culture would lead you to expect, were particularly bad areas for drug fatalities fifteen years ago, but now, the problem is clearly a national one. “What other people had been saying was that this was predominantly a rural problem of drug poisoning,” Lauren Rossen, one of the people who put together this analysis, told me. “We were somewhat surprised to find that drug poisoning death rates were actually highest in metropolitan areas.” Exceptions are the state of New York and a narrow band running through the center of the contiguous states, from North Dakota to Texas.
Click “Know More” to read more about this troubling trend.
[Click here to see the original post]

Tuesday, October 7, 2014

Over Medicating Workers' Compensation Patients

When is it too much? That is the big question. Easy access to medication may also be a major problem. Today' s post is shared from nytimes.com\

A huge number of patients suffer from adverse medication issues that complicate workers' compensation claims even further. New data indicates that over medication of patients even complicates the issues further.
The most common cause of fatal allergic reactions in the United States are medicines, especially antibiotics and radiocontrast agents used in imaging studies, a new analysis found.
Using data from the National Center for Health Statistics, researchers found 2,458 cases of fatal anaphylaxis from 1999 through 2010. Almost 60 percent of the deaths, or 1,446, were caused by reactions to drugs, and in cases where the specific drug was known, half were caused by antibiotics. The rate of drug-induced fatal reactions almost doubled over the period.
Insect stings caused 15.2 percent of the fatalities and food 6.7 percent. The cause was not recorded in a fifth of the cases.
The study, published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, also found that older age was associated with a higher risk for death and that blacks had a higher risk of dying from drugs and food reactions. For insect sting deaths, rates among whites were almost three times as high as rates among African-Americans.
The lead author, Dr. Elina Jerschow, an assistant professor of medicine at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in the Bronx, said that part of the increase in drug-induced allergic deaths is probably due to changes in the way deaths are coded on death certificates. But, she added, “We are using more imaging studies than other countries, and they’re potentially life-threatening. After antibiotics, radiocontrast was the chief culprit.”
A version of this article appears in...
[Click here to see the rest of this post]

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Asbestos Related Diseases Reflecting a Slight Decline

Asbestosis: Number of deaths, crude and age-adjusted death rates, U.S. residents age 15 and over, 1968–2005

Asbestosis deaths among U.S. residents age 15 and over have increased from 78 in 1968 to 1,493 in 2000 and then decreased slightly to 1,470 in 2004. (Ref. No. 2007F01-01, 2007T01-01). Data from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) indicate a trend towards lower asbestos exposure levels from 1979 to 1999, concomitant with mandated reductions in the OSHA permissible exposure limit (PEL). However, data indicate a steady increase in asbestos exposure levels in the mining industry for the years 2000 through 2003 and a slight rise in all other industries in the two years previous to 2003. (Ref. No. 2007F01-05, 2007T01-12).

Residents of California, Florida, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia, and Washington together accounted for nearly half of all asbestosis deaths in the 1995 to 2004 period. (Ref. No. 2007T01-04).

There were over 15,000 malignant mesothelioma deaths among U.S. residents age 15 and over accounting for more than 200,000 years of potential life lost to life expectancy in the 1999–2004 period. (Ref. No. 2007T07-01, 2007T07-03). For 1999–2004, nearly 20% of mesothelioma decedents were female. (Ref. No. 2007T07-01). Occupations associated with significantly elevated mesothelioma mortality in 1999 include plumbers, pipefitters, and steamfitters; mechanical engineers; electricians; and elementary school teachers. (Ref. No. 2007T07-09).

The Work-Related Lung Disease (WoRLD) Surveillance System, produced by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), presents up-to-date summary tables, graphs, and figures of occupationally-related respiratory disease surveillance data on the pneumoconioses, occupational asthma and other airways diseases, and several other respiratory conditions. For many of these diseases, selected data on related exposures are also presented.

Thursday, July 24, 2014

Preventing Worker Injuries and Deaths from Backing Construction Vehicles and Equipment at Roadway Construction Worksites

Today's post was shared by Construction @ NIOSH and comes from www.cdc.gov

DHHS (NIOSH) Publication Number 2014-125
Workers on roadway construction worksites are exposed to possible injury and death from moving construction vehicles and equipment [NIOSH 2001].
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) recommends that specific procedures and controls be in place at roadway construction worksites to help prevent injuries and deaths from backing construction vehicles and equipment.
Preventing Worker Injuries and Deaths from Backing Construction Vehicles and Equipment at Roadway Construction Worksites [PDF - 430 KB]
[Click here to see the rest of this post]

Friday, August 16, 2013

Bangladesh Building Collapse Highlights Need for Safety Inspections

Today's post comes from guest author Kit Case from Causey Law Firm. 
Ed Note: Samsung has been sued in Brazil over factory working conditions

The total number of workers killed or injured in the collapse of a building in Savar, Bangladesh on April 24, 2013 is not yet known, as rescuers continue to search for survivors.  As of Sunday, April 28th, the count was at least 377 dead.  


Bangladeshi Workers Protest Deaths
Many of those killed were workers at clothing factories housed in the building, known as Rana Plaza, where fire broke out in the wreckage of the building, temporarily suspending rescue efforts as of April 24.  Efforts will restart with the aide of heavy equipment, which had previously been avoided in an effort to not injure those still buried in the rubble.  T

here no longer are assumed to be any victims remaining alive, although hundreds remain unaccounted for. The death toll surpassed a fire five months ago that killed 112 people and brought widespread pledges to improve worker-safety standards. But since then, very little has changed in Bangladesh.
Human Rights Watch reported on the building collapse, noting that it knows of no cases in which the Bangladeshi government has ever prosecuted a factory owner over the deaths of workers.
 USA Today reported on the tragedy with the news that Mohammed Sohel Rana, the fugitive owner of the illegally-constructed building, was apprehended by a commando force while trying to flee to India.  Rana was returned to Dhaka to face charges of negligence. Rana had been on the run since the building collapsed Wednesday. He last appeared in public Tuesday in front of the Rana Plaza after huge cracks appeared in the building. Witnesses said he assured tenants, including five garment factories, that the building was safe. Hours later, the Rana Plaza was reduced to rubble, crushing most victims under massive blocks of concrete.

Human Rights Watch reported on the building collapse, noting that it knows of no cases in which the Bangladeshi government has ever prosecuted a factory owner over the deaths of workers. Many factory owners in Bangladesh are parliamentarians or members of the main political parties. In an interview with a government minister in 2011, the minister told Human Rights Watch that it would be “impossible” to improve workers rights so long as factory owners were senior members of political parties. 

Wednesday, March 24, 2021

UCSF and Johns Hopkins University Launch Digital Trove of Opioid Industry Documents

The University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) and Johns Hopkins University today announced the launch of the Opioid Industry Documents Archive, a digital repository of publicly disclosed documents from recent judgments, settlements, and ongoing lawsuits concerning the opioid crisis.

Friday, December 18, 2009

The Cost of Work Related Deaths


The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has transposed the gloomy statistics of the fatalities of work related accident into a grim economic figure of a "societal cost" of $43 Billion. The data reviewed was from 1992 through 2001 and consisted of 51,864 fatalities. Costs were expressed in 2001 dollars.

"The burden that fatal occupational injury imposes upon society is severe and multidimensional. In addition to the human costs associated with the loss of a family member, an employee, and a coworker, there are costs that are economic in nature. No single metric can capture all the dimensions of loss, either personal or economic; it is extraordinarily difficult to measure the contribution of a family member or that of an active member of a community or group. To understand the dimensions of loss more fully, it is necessary to measure the aspects of fatal occupational injury that can be captured. Demographic data on fatal workplace injury was captured in the National Traumatic Occupational Fatality Surveillance system, maintained by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).

"The current document is an attempt to build upon the surveillance data by adding an economic component; the data in this monograph provide a measure of the economic loss to society from the premature deaths of workers in various economic sectors, by states, to society as a whole, over time, by cause of death, and by demographic characteristics. The findings are compelling: over the period studied, 1992–2001, the estimated costs from these premature deaths exceeded $43 billion. "


Friday, June 7, 2013

Frank Lautenberg: The Senator From Paterson

Senator Frank Lautenberg passed away this week and his legacy of helping the workers will live on for generations. "The boy Paterson," as he used to say, knew first hand of the problems confronted by those who worked in his hometown's asbestos factories.

Official Photograph of U.S. Senator Frank Laut...
Official Photograph of U.S. Senator Frank Lautenberg
1924-2013
 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
At one of my early meetings with the late Irving J. Selikoff, MD, the world renown asbestos expert of the health dangers of asbestos fiber, the doctor highlighted the necessity for a strong link between medicine and politics. Both Dr. Selikoff and Senator Lautenberg, grew up and worked in Paterson, NJ.

Paterson, was the home of several asbestos manufacturing factories since it was on a railroad link and was equal distant to major US East coast seaports. Asbestos was a strategic commodity for the US military during World War II.  Asbestos had allegedly "miracle properties" that acted as an insulating agent on Navy ships, boiler rooms  and other heat producing equipment. The serious and adverse effects of asbestos fiber to humans was not readily made known to workers and the public at large.

Consequently, an epidemic of asbestos related disease, including: asbestosis, lung cancer and mesothelioma followed decades after exposure and inflicted disease and death in epidemic proportions. The "original 17" workers' compensation asbestos cases in New Jersey for exposures at The Union Asbestos and Rubber Company plant in Paterson NJ were heard at the Paterson (Passaic County) office of the NJ Division of Workers' Compensation. My father, Carl Gelman, represented the workers and the their dependents, and their medical expert was Dr. Irving J. Selikoff, MD. All were Patersonians.

Dr. Selikoff went onto head the Environmental Sciences Laboratory at the Mount Sinai Medical Center, NY, and continued to follow the cohort of workers through The Paterson Asbestos Control project. That lead to a research project that was published and presented at the New York Academy of Sciences in 1964. International concern was raised over the deadly hazard of asbestos fiber.

Medical research alone could not protect workers in a meaningful way, and Dr. Selikoff knew that, and impressed upon me that the US Senate and Congress would be catalysts for political change that help protect workers from asbestos and other hazardous progress. Likewise, Senator Lautenberg knew that also, and had strong and professional relationship with Dr. Selikoff.

Senator Lautenberg advanced the concept of an important medical-political relationship from asbestos to other environmental hazards and chemicals, including tobacco. The "boy from Paterson,"  sparked by a strong foundation of concern for asbestos workers and public health, brought to Washington a vision for a safer and healthier nation that made a difference to all.


Statement of Hon. Frank R. Lautenberg, U.S. Senator from the                    
State of New Jersey

"Madam Chairman, thank you for holding today's hearing on the health
effects of asbestos. Let me welcome Senator Murray to the committee and
thank her for working to keep Americans safe from asbestos.

   Every year, more than two-thousand Americans die premature and
painful deaths from exposure to asbestos. Their deaths leave children
without parents, and families struggling to make ends meet.

   New Jersey has America's sixth-highest number of deaths from
asbestos. From asbestos used in ship insulation at shipyards to
asbestos used to insulate pipes at refineries and factories, at least
two-thousand seven-hundred and seventy-five New Jerseyans died because
of asbestos exposure from 1979 to 2001. Just last week, a school in
Asbury Park was closed because part of the ceiling fell and asbestos
was found. This toxin's presence in offices, schools and homes could
pose health risks for years to come--ranging from breathing problems to
lung damage and cancer.

    One of the leading researchers on the link between asbestos and
lung disease was Dr. Irving Selikoff, who lived in New Jersey. Dr.
Selikoff did his research on workers across my state, including those
in my home town of Paterson. In 1979, Dr. Selikoff showed that one in
five asbestos workers developed a fatal lung disease. Senator Murray's
bill is a strategy for real action to reduce asbestos in the places we
live and work.

    The bill will ban the use of asbestos to the maximum extent
possible and benefit companies who are producing safer alternatives. It
also calls for more research on the health affects of asbestos, as well
as the best treatment options for asbestos-related illnesses and better
coordination among federal agencies. Congress owes our children and
grandchildren action now to protect them from asbestos in the future.

    I look forward to hearing the testimony of today's witnesses.

    Thank you Madam Chairman.

EXAMINING THE HUMAN HEALTH EFFECTS OF ASBESTOS AND THE METHODS: MITIGATING SUCH IMPACTS, Tuesday, June 12, 2007, The US Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works.
.........
 
"Mr. LAUTENBERG. Mr. President, since time is limited, I am going to get down to the nuts and bolts. I come from a State in which asbestos was prominent in manufacturing in many places. As a matter of fact, early in the 1950s, a doctor named Irving Selikoff, who was a researcher as well as a physician, discovered the lethality of asbestos. He is the one who raised the alarm about the dangers of that product.

He saw mesothelioma and asbestosis.

In my office in New Jersey, I had a man and his wife and his mature son, who was about 30 years old, come in to see me because they all had mesothelioma, but only the father worked in the manufacturing facility, the mill. His wife and child, his son, were made ill as a result of the mother washing her husband's clothes. That is how lethal, how dangerous asbestos is.

This bill is an abstract exercise. There are real people involved, people who are going to die as a result of the exposure. I have seen it up front and personal. A friend of mine who was a lawyer, after practicing 20 years, got a call from a member of a union one day that had asbestos workers, and he was told to get a chest x ray. He did. After 20 years of no illness, nothing, suddenly they found that he had a spot on his lung, and it turned into mesothelioma and he was dead soon thereafter.

I recently had a World War II vet--I am one as well--come into my office, sick from mesothelioma, from work he did 40 years ago. We have seen so many cases where the gestation period is so long, so that to suddenly close this out and say that is going to be enough money, $140 billion--it sounds like a lot, but it is not a lot when it comes to individuals who need help and who need to be able to continue to conduct their lives and do whatever they can to make life comfortable.

The Congressional Budget Office has stated that the fund will need $10 billion more. Other analysts put the figure as high as $300 billion. So it is fairly obvious that I am going to oppose this bill and support the point of order. I urge my colleagues to do the same because what we are doing is dismissing the suffering of people who have been exposed to this, even though the companies knew how dangerous the material was they were working with. They permitted people to work with it and did not do anything about it, except ultimately, in many cases, they went bankrupt as a result of their behavior.

FAIRNESS IN ASBESTOS INJURY RESOLUTION ACT OF 2005--Resumed -- (Senate - February 14, 2006)
................


"Mr. LAUTENBERG. Mr. President, I rise today in memory of a dear friend of mine, Prof. Irving J. Selikoff. Irving's uncompromised dedication to medical research and education in disease caused by hazardous materials paved the way for new standards of occupational safety. He was an extremely committed individual and I have learned a great deal about life, ethics, and public policy from him.
Dr. Selikoff's commitment to making the world a better place to live has been an inspiration to me and has further spurred my efforts to improve the public health. Mr. President, Dr. Irving Selikoff passed away on May 20, 1992, but he left us a legacy of medical knowledge that will continue to change the way people across the Nation live for many years to come. He will be missed.

Mr. President, on August 3, 1992, the industrial union department of the AFL-CIO adopted a resolution in memory of Dr. Selikoff. I want to share these words with my collegues and I ask unanimous consent that it be included in the Record.

Senator Lautenberg's Resolution in Memory of Dr. Irving J. Selikoff, January 15, 1915-May 20, 1992

Dr. Selikoff was a legend among workers. No other physician had as close a relationship with so many working people. He saw himself as a public servant, proud of working for a city medical school and being paid by the people.

He was first recognized as a scientist while serving in a public tuberculosis hospital, where he conducted the clinical trials for Isoniazid. This drug brought the `white plague', then the most serious disease in the workplace, under control. He started a clinic in Paterson, New Jersey, a community of textile workers. There, in response to disease among his own patients, all union members, he linked lung scarring and cancer to working with asbestos.

When he understood the importance of this finding, he left his clinic and established at Mt. Sinai School of Medicine a program designed to end the asbestos scourge with tools of science and medicine placed in the hands of unions. Soon his work on asbestos and many other workplace pollutants impacted every affiliate of the Industrial Union Department.

Dr. Selikoff studied and counseled workers and their families in Baltimore, Charleston, Lansing, Duluth, Midland, Norfolk, Nitro, Port Allegheny, New York's Chinatown, the Rocky Mountains and the mountains of Vermont, Canada's Mohawk reservation and hundreds of other places. He became known as a great scientist, but he never stopped being a doctor who worked tirelessly every day of the week, examining chartered plane loads of workers on Sunday and bringing clinics to wherever workers gathered, whether in the union hall at night or the convention on Saturday.

He knew that doctors need to understand the workplace and the labor movement. He required all his students to work in or with the Industrial Union Department. He gave us a network of physicians and scientists who continue to help us, whether in the clinic or before the Congress.

He knew that labor and science function internationally. He gave us a community of university allies in thirty countries under the aegis of Collegium Ramazzini and its Institute for Occupational and Environmental Health Research.

He knew that we seldom could achieve zero exposure to most toxic substances in the workplace. He helped us create the Workplace Health Fund to assist workers at risk, become partners in cancer treatment research and develop special programs of education.

Dr. Selikoff gave us an agenda for the future, and a Center at Mt. Sinai, the Selikoff Fund of the Workplace Health Fund, and the Ramazzini Institute for Occupational and Environmental Health Research to carry out the agenda. It is up to those of us who benefitted from his life work to continue to support the institutions he created.
  • IRVING J. SELIKOFF TRIBUTE (Senate - August 04, 1992)
    [Page: S11410]

Thursday, October 17, 2013

Outdoor air pollution: a leading environmental cause of cancer deaths

The specialized cancer agency of the WHO, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), announced that it has classified outdoor air pollution as carcinogenic to humans. The IARC evaluation concluded that there is sufficient evidence that exposure to outdoor air pollution causes lung cancer.

The specialized cancer agency of the World Health Organization, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), announced today that it has classified outdoor air pollution as carcinogenic to humans (Group 1).

After thoroughly reviewing the latest available scientific literature, the world’s leading experts convened by  the IARC Monographs Programme concluded that there is sufficient evidence that exposure to outdoor air  pollution causes lung cancer (Group 1). They also noted a positive association with an increased risk of  bladder cancer.

Particulate matter, a major component of outdoor air pollution, was evaluated separately and was also
classified as carcinogenic to humans (Group 1).

The IARC evaluation showed an increasing risk of lung cancer with increasing levels of exposure to
particulate matter and air pollution. Although the composition of air pollution and levels of exposure can vary dramatically between locations, the conclusions of the Working Group apply to all regions of the  world.

A major environmental health problem Air pollution is already known to increase risks for a wide range of diseases, such as respiratory and heart diseases. Studies indicate that in recent years exposure levels have increased significantly in some parts of the world, particularly in rapidly industrializing countries with large populations. The most recent data indicate that in 2010, 223 000 deaths from lung cancer worldwide resulted from air pollution.

The most widespread environmental carcinogen “The air we breathe has become polluted with a mixture of cancer-causing substances,” says Dr Kurt Straif, Head of the IARC Monographs Section. “We now know that outdoor air pollution is not only a major  risk to health in general, but also a leading environmental cause of cancer deaths.”

The IARC Monographs Programme, dubbed the “encyclopaedia of carcinogens”, provides an authoritative source of scientific evidence on cancer-causing substances and exposures. In the past, the Programme evaluated many individual chemicals and specific mixtures that occur in outdoor air pollution. These included diesel engine exhaust, solvents, metals, and dusts. But this is the first time that experts have classified outdoor air pollution as a cause of cancer.

“Our task was to evaluate the air everyone breathes rather than focus on specific air pollutants,” explains Dr Dana Loomis, Deputy Head of the Monographs Section. “The results from the reviewed studies point in the same direction: the risk of developing lung cancer is significantly increased in people exposed to air pollution.”

Friday, February 13, 2015

Smoking: The under-estimated contributing factor

Smoking and occupational illness is a compounding factor in workers' compensation claims and that a study reports is also underestimated. A study funded by the American Cancer Society and published in the New England Journal of Medicine this week reveals.

"Mortality among current smokers is 2 to 3 times as high as that among persons who never smoked. Most of this excess mortality is believed to be explained by 21 common diseases that have been formally established as caused by cigarette smoking and are included in official estimates of smoking-attributable mortality in the United States. However, if smoking causes additional diseases, these official estimates may significantly underestimate the number of deaths attributable to smoking."

"During the follow-up period, there were 181,377 deaths, including 16,475 among current smokers. Overall, approximately 17% of the excess mortality among current smokers was due to associations with causes that are not currently established as attributable to smoking. These included associations between current smoking and deaths from renal failure (relative risk, 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7 to 2.3), intestinal ischemia (relative risk, 6.0; 95% CI, 4.5 to 8.1), hypertensive heart disease (relative risk, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.9 to 3.0), infections (relative risk, 2.3; 95% CI, 2.0 to 2.7), various respiratory diseases (relative risk, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.6 to 2.4), breast cancer (relative risk, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.2 to 1.5), and prostate cancer (relative risk, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2 to 1.7). Among former smokers, the relative risk for each of these outcomes declined as the number of years since quitting increased."


Historically, occupational exposure to tobacco smoke has been recognized as a compensable condition. An Atlantic City NJ casino card dealer employed at the Claridge Hotel who was exposed to second hand tobacco smoke was awarded workers' compensation benefits. NJ Judge Cosmo Giovinazzi award $150,00 for lost wages and medical benefits to a card dealer holding that second-hand tobacco smoke materially contributed to the employee's lung cancer.

Smoking and Mortality — Beyond Established Causes
Brian D. Carter, M.P.H., Christian C. Abnet, Ph.D., Diane Feskanich, Sc.D., Neal D. Freedman, Ph.D., Patricia Hartge, Sc.D., Cora E. Lewis, M.D., Judith K. Ockene, Ph.D., Ross L. Prentice, Ph.D., Frank E. Speizer, M.D., Michael J. Thun, M.D., and Eric J. Jacobs, Ph.D.
N Engl J Med 2015; 372:631-640 February 12, 2015 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa1407211

….
Jon L. Gelman of Wayne NJ is the author of NJ Workers’ Compensation Law (West-Thompson-Reuters) and co-author of the national treatise, Modern Workers’ Compensation Law (West-Thompson-Reuters). For over 4 decades the Law Offices of Jon L Gelman  1.973.696.7900  jon@gelmans.com  have been representing injured workers and their families who have suffered occupational accidents and illnesses.

Thursday, July 11, 2019

Expert Physicians Urge US to Ban Asbestos

Today's post is shared from nejm.org

"Each year, nearly 40,000 Americans die often painful, protracted deaths from diseases caused by asbestos. These deaths occur in firefighters, police officers, construction workers, miners, military veterans, shipyard workers, and maintenance workers whose exposures to asbestos are primarily occupational. Death also occurs in partners and children of such workers, whose only exposures to asbestos were from dust on clothing brought home from work by a family member. In the United States, treatment of asbestos-related diseases — including malignant mesothelioma, asbestosis, lung cancer, laryngeal cancer, and ovarian cancer1 — costs hundreds of millions of dollars each year.

Friday, July 25, 2014

OSHA cites willful safety violation after workers expected to 'free climb' 195-foot tower without adequate fall protection

Two workers were free climbing, or climbing without safety lines, a 195-foot communication tower under construction without adequate fall protection in Coolville. As a result, Morlan Enterprises has been cited for one willful and eight serious safety violations by the U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration. OSHA has proposed penalties of $52,500.
"Free climbing a communication tower is extremely dangerous, and it was this company's responsibility to ensure appropriate fall protection was provided and used," said Deborah Zubaty, OSHA's area director in Columbus. "Employers and cell tower owners and operators must do everything possible to stop senseless, preventable tragedies in the communication tower industry."
No more falling workers. Disturbing trend in communication towers-related worker deaths. 2011 = 6; 2012 = 2; 2013 = 13. Source: CY data from OSHA Integrated Management Information System.
In 2013, 13 workers were fatally injured at communication work sites. The majority of these deaths were a result of falls. OSHA requires employers to provide fall protection equipment, train employees how to use the safety equipment and ensure that they use it properly and consistently.
Morlan Enterprises was contracted by New Era Broadband Services of Coolville to perform tower construction and antenna installation services at 20 locations in the Meigs County area. The New Era Broadband construction project is being funded by a grant, administered through the U.S. Department of Agriculture-Rural Utilities Service, to bring broadband services to underserved communities in the area.
The willful violation cites the company for failing to ensure workers climbing the tower were using effective and adequate fall protection, including installing a climbing cable to the tower. A willful violation is one committed with intentional, knowing or voluntary disregard for the law's requirement, or with plain indifference to employee safety and health.
Eight serious violations were cited for failing to provide workers with training on fall hazards, provide personal protective equipment, such as shock-absorbing lanyards and hard hats, and requiring workers to purchase their own fall arrest harnesses and other protective equipment. Other violations involved failing to make provisions for prompt medical attention* before starting work and having first aid kits available for emergencies.
An OSHA violation is serious if death or serious physical harm could result from a hazard an employer knew or should have known exists.
OSHA is concerned about the alarming increase in preventable injuries and fatalities at communication tower work sites. As a result, OSHA is collaborating with the National Association of Tower Erectors and other industry stakeholders to ensure that every communication tower employer understands how to protect workers performing this high-hazard work.
More fatalities occurred in this industry in 2013 than in the previous two years combined. This disturbing trend appears to be continuing, with seven worker deaths occurring so far in 2014. To prevent these tragic incidents, OSHA has sent a letter to communication tower employers urging compliance and strict adherence to safety standards and common-sense practices. OSHA has also created a new Web page targeting the issues surrounding communication tower work. This outreach follows a November 2013 memo to OSHA's compliance officers and regional administrators* mandating increased attention, education and data collection on the industry.
Morlan Enterprises, based in Parkersburg, West Virginia, has 15 business days from receipt of its citations and penalties to comply, request an informal conference with OSHA's area director, or contest the findings before the independent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.

Wednesday, December 16, 2020

Major increase in work-related deaths reported

The US Bureau of Labor Statistics has released the census of fatal occupational injuries in 2019. A major increase in work-related deaths has been reported over the prior year. The changing workplace and a major increase in deliveries were reflected in the report in that nearly one out of every five fatally injured workers was employed as a driver/sales worker or truck driver.

Thursday, May 31, 2018

Workers exposed to common paint strippers suffer fatal reactions

Litigation is advancing against the distributors and resellers of paint strippers containing methylene chloride and NMP. The lawsuits were filed for damages resulting from the alleged exposure, illness and death of users of the products.