Copyright

(c) 2010-2024 Jon L Gelman, All Rights Reserved.

Monday, October 28, 2013

Beyond Fast Food Strikes

Today's post was shared by Steven Greenhouse and comes from jacobinmag.com

9631534027_91325b1b89_z

Why the Left shouldn’t write off low-wage strikes.

Struggling through a frigid March rain earlier this year, rounding up carts in the parking lot of the Chicago Whole Foods where I work, one of my bosses stood at the door.
“That weather really sucks,” he said offhandedly. I nodded tersely. “But, hey,” he continued, chuckling. “What are you going to do? Go on strike?”
It made sense that he found the idea of us striking absurd – strikes are at an all-time low, nearly nonexistent in shops like mine, and almost none of my co-workers have ever been in a union. But a month later, we did. Ten Whole Foods workers walked off the job to protest a draconian attendance policy and poverty wages, along with 200 fast food and retail workers across the city and thousands across the country.
Low-wage fast food and retail workers took center stage for the American labor movement this summer. The Fight for 15 (FF15) campaign went public last November, then erupted earlier this spring, as workers walked off the job in New York, then Chicago, then St. Louis, Milwaukee, Detroit, and Seattle. Seven cities organized a second week of one-day strikes at the end of July. Then, on August 29, 62 cities and more than 1,000 workers struck around two principal demands: $15 an hour minimum wage and the right to form a union without retaliation.
We are part of a new generation of workers rediscovering our strongest weapons: the union and the...
[Click here to see the rest of this post]

CDC - NIOSH Update - NIOSH Study of Firefighters Finds Increased Rates of Cancer

Today's post was shared by WCBlog and comes from www.cdc.gov


A combined population of 30,000 firefighters from three large cities had higher rates of several types of cancers, and of all cancers combined, than the U.S. population as a whole, researchers from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and colleagues found in a new study.
The new findings are generally consistent with the results of several previous, smaller studies. Because the new study had a larger study population followed for a longer period of time, the results strengthen the scientific evidence for a relation between firefighting and cancer, the researchers said.
The findings were reported in an article posted on-line on Oct. 14, 2013, by the peer-reviewed journal Occupational and Environmental Medicine. The article is available online at http://oem.bmj.com/content/early/2013/10/14/oemed-2013-101662.full .
The researchers found that:
  • Cancers of the respiratory, digestive, and urinary systems accounted mostly for the higher rates of cancer seen in the study population. The higher rates suggest that firefighters are more likely to develop those cancers.
  • The population of firefighters in the study had a rate of mesothelioma two times greater than the rate in the U.S. population as a whole. This was the first study ever to identify an excess of mesothelioma in U.S. firefighters. The researchers said it was likely that the findings were associated with exposure to asbestos, a...
[Click here to see the rest of this post]

Sunday, October 27, 2013

Increased in risk of specific NHL subtypes associated with occupational exposure to TCE

Trichloroethylene
Study published linking trichloroethylene exposure to cancer.

The chemical compound trichloroethylene (C2HCl3) is a chlorinated hydrocarbon commonly used as an industrial solvent. It is a clear non-flammable liquid with a sweet smell.

"Objectives We evaluated the association between occupational exposure to trichloroethylene (TCE) and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in a pooled 
analysis of four international case-control studies.

Methods Overall, the pooled study population included 3788 NHL cases and 4279 controls. Risk of NHL and its major subtypes associated with TCE exposure was calculated with unconditional logistic regression and polytomous regression analysis, adjusting by age, gender and study.

Results Risk of follicular lymphoma (FL), but not NHL overall or other subtypes, increased by probability (p=0.02) and intensity level (p=0.04), and with the combined analysis of four exposure metrics assumed as independent (p=0.004). After restricting the analysis to the most likely exposed study subjects, risk of NHL overall, FL and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) were elevated and increased by duration of exposure (p=0.009, p=0.04 and p=0.01, respectively) and with the combined analysis of duration, frequency and intensity of exposure (p=0.004, p=0.015 and p=0.005, respectively). Although based on small numbers of exposed, risk of all the major NHL subtypes, namely diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, FL and CLL, showed increases in risk ranging 2–3.2-fold in the highest category of exposure intensity. No significant heterogeneity in risk was detected by major NHL subtypes or by study.

Conclusions Our pooled analysis apparently supports the hypothesis of an increase in risk of specific NHL subtypes associated with occupational exposure to TCE.

Saturday, October 26, 2013

Kings Dominion: Please Shut Down "Miners' Revenge" Halloween Attraction

Making a Halloween Attraction out of a fatal work disaster is in bad taste and repulsive. Today's post was shared from change.org

Kings Dominion hopes to make some big bucks this year with a Halloween attraction called “Miners’ Revenge.”

According to Kings Dominion website, which is selling tickets for $32.99, the theme of this Halloween thriller is this:

"Alone in the darkness… the only sound is the pulsing of your heart as the searing  heat slowly boils you alive… It was reported to be the worst coal mine accident in history. The families of missing miners begged for help but it was decided that a rescue was too dangerous. The miners were left entombed deep underground. Lamps at their sides and pick-axes in their hands they are searching for the men who left them to die…"

Really?

I can’t even describe my outrage reading this advertisement.

In April 2010, we had the Upper Big Branch explosion in West Virginia where rescuers desperately searched in unfathomable conditions hoping, praying to find one of the 29 Upper Big Branch miners alive.

    It was in 2007 when a mine rescue had to be abandoned at the Crandall Canyon Mine in Utah where six miners were trapped (and not presumed dead in the beginning). The rescue was dangerous and considered one of the most difficult in history, and then three rescuers perished trying to desperately dig to get to their mining brothers.

    It was in 2006 when we had the triple disasters of Sago, Darby and Aracoma — losing 19 miners in West Virginia  to fire and CO poisoning, rescuers braving horrific conditions looking for their lost brothers.

    In 2001 — 13 miners killed at the Jim Walters Mine in Alabama only days after 9/11. Twelve of those who perished were miners who would not leave the mine, and were trying to rescue one of their own.

    We have the 1993 Magma Mine accident in Arizona in which a half million pound raise collapsed on four miners in a copper mine.

    The 1992 South Mountain Mine disaster in West Virginia  where eight perished.
    In the 1999 Kaiser explosion in Louisana no one died, but Gary Guy was found by a fellow employee with his skin peeling off from caustic chemicals. Twenty-two were injured — 14 seriously.

Click here to read the entire article and sign the petition


Orca whale trainer saw best of Keiko, worst of Tilikum

The fatal accident of a whale trainer continues to be of concern. after a "whale ate" a Sea World trainer. Todays' blog was shaved by CNN.

Watch an encore of "Blackfish" on CNN, Saturday, October 26 at 7 p.m. ET and Sunday, October 27 at 9 p.m. ET.

Colin Baird still remembers the day he got the call from work more than 23 years ago, when he learned of his co-worker's fate.

"We need you to come in," said his colleague from the Sealand of the Pacific in Victoria.

His fellow trainer, 20-year old Keltie Byrne, had slipped and fallen into the orca tank. Byrne was an exceptionally strong swimmer but she was no match for the aquarium's killer whales.

"She tried to get back out and the other girl tried to pull her up, but the whale grabbed her back foot and pulled her under," eyewitness Nadine Kallen told CNN affiliate CTV in 1991. "And then the whales -- they bounced her around the pool a whole bunch of times, and she was screaming for help.

"They tried to grab her with sticks, but they couldn't get her," Kallen said. "And she finally didn't come up any more."

There were three orcas at Sealand at the time -- two females, Haida and Nootka, and Tilikum, the sole male. Tilikum would later become infamous for the 2010 killing of SeaWorld trainer Dawn Brancheau.

Tilikum -- or "Tili," as he was known -- was popular and "very easy to work with," Baird recalled.

"He was very easygoing, he learned quickly, he learned well, very responsive," he said. "You know, he was probably my favorite of the three."
...
[Click here to see the rest of this post]




Found on


Halloween Costumes: What to Look For

Today's post was shared by U.S. CPSC and comes from www.cpsc.gov

CPSC and U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s recent seizure at a U.S. port of two shipments of children’s Halloween costumes with safety issues has resulted in many questions to us about what parents should look for when buying a Halloween costume.

Here are some things for you to consider:

Q: Are costumes required to be flame resistant?

A: Yes. Costumes can’t have fabrics that burn rapidly and intensely. This applies to all clothing, including costumes.

Q: Are accessories such as wigs, beards and wings also required to be flame resistant?

A: Yes. Both Halloween accessories and toys must meet flammability requirements.

Q: Different Halloween costumes have different warnings. Some say “flame resistant.” Some say “keep away from flames.” Some say nothing. Does this mean that some items are flame resistant and others are not?

A: No. All costumes must meet the flammability requirements. This doesn’t mean that textiles won’t burn. All textiles can burn and should be kept away from flames. Parents should look for costumes made from synthetic fibers like nylon and polyester because these materials are less likely to ignite, will resist burning and will extinguish more quickly if they do ignite.

Manufacturers sometimes promote this by putting a “flame resistant” label on the package. The warning label to keep a costume away from flames is important advice that is provided by the...


[Click here to see the rest of this post]



Found on



Related articles
Six Retailers Announce Recall of Buckyballs and Buckycubes High-Powered Magnet Sets Due to Ingestion Hazard (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
Bangladesh: Is Worker Safety Failing in the Global Supply Chain? (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
U.S. Textile Plants Return, With Floors Largely Empty of People (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
Frigidaire Recalls Professional Blenders Due to Laceration Hazard (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
Cambridge Metal & Plastics Recalls Motorcycle Training Wheels Due to a Crash Hazard (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
Votive Candle Holders Sold at Cracker Barrel Old Country Store Recalled Due to Fire Hazard; Made by Mercuries Asia (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)


Black lung injury not compensable because company was OSHA-compliant


Today's post is shared from thinkprogress.org via @RWJF_PubHealth

A furnace operator seeking a Workers’ Compensation claim against his employer for allegedly suffering exposure to occupational pneumoconiosis was properly denied because the company was compliant with OSHA standards, the state Supreme Court has held.

Randy Torris originally filed a claim alleging he suffered exposure to the hazards of occupational pneumoconiosis, also known as “black lung,” while working as a furnace operator for Alcan Rolled Products-Ravenswood, LLC.

In 2009, an administrator rejected Torris’ claim. Torris then appealed the ruling to the state Workers’ Compensation Board of Review, which affirmed the administrator’s decision in a 2011 ruling saying Torris did not meet the exposure requirement for a valid pneumoconiosis claim.

Torris again appealed, asserting that there was sufficient evidence to prove he was exposed to the hazards of occupational pneumoconiosis for the entire time he worked for the company.

In its defense, Torris’ employer argued it performed regular industrial hygiene testing while Torris was with the company and also met OSHA regulations to limit employee exposure to excessive or harmful quantities of dust.

The state Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision released Oct. 4, upheld the board’s ruling citing state rule §85-20-52.2 (2006).

The rule states that if “an employer submits credible...

[Click here to see the rest of this post]



Found on



Related articles
Safety Violations Matter: Wisconsin Court Reaffirms Basis for Employer Safety Penalties (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
What a Government Default Will Do To Workers' Compensation (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
Steel company fined $115,400 by US Labor Department's OSHA for failing to abate workplace hazards (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
Florida rejects workers' compensation rate hike (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
How OSHA's West Fertilizer fine stacks up against others (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
OSHA cites Nebraska Cold Storage for 14 safety violations including ammonia exposure (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)