President Barack Obama announced his intent to nominate David Michaels, Assistant Secretary for the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Department of Labor.
Copyright
Wednesday, July 29, 2009
President Barack Obama announced his intent to nominate David Michaels Assistant Secretary for the OSHA
Monday, July 14, 2014
OSHA Chief: Inequality in America Is About Workplace Hazards, Too
Inequality and poverty have taken center stage in American politics in the years since the recession. Fast food workers have raised the profile of low-wage work, cities and states around the country are raising the minimum wage, and elected officials in both parties have made the struggles of poor Americans core political issues. But David Michaels, Ph.D., M.P.H., who leads the Occupational Safety and Health Administration under the Obama administration, says that workplace inequality is more than just wages. In an interview, Michaels, who is responsible for enforcing federal laws to project workers from illness and injury, says the regulatory structures he oversees aren’t sufficient to protect vulnerable workers from harm. NBC: The political conversation about inequality in recent years has focused on wages. You've made the point that when addressing inequality, we should focus more on workplace health and safety issues. Why? Michaels: Wages are clearly a core component of the discussion of inequality and the ability to get into and stay in middle class. But workplace health and safety issues also have an enormous impact. Workplace injury and illness can push workers out of middle-class jobs and make it hard to enter into the middle class in the first place. Studies show that workplace injury... |
Related articles
- The Right to a Safe Workplace (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- OSHA Cites Nebraska Food Supplement Plant for 10 Violations (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- OSHA Reaches Employer Agreement to Stop Discouraging Employee Accident Reports (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- OSHA announces proposed new rule to improve tracking of workplace injuries and illnesses (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- OSHA Needs To Be Strengthened (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
Thursday, July 2, 2009
C-Span TV: David Michaels Author of "Doubt is Their Product"
Sunday, August 9, 2009
Highlighting Safety at OSHA
In a recent discussion on National Public Radio's program "Living on Earth," a "New Approach to Workplace Dangers" was discussed. "President Obama recently announced the nomination of David Michaels to head up the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Michaels, a public health professional, has been an outspoken critic of polluting industries, accusing them of manufacturing uncertainty so as to undermine the science behind regulation. Host Jeff Young talks to Sidney Shapiro, a Wake Forest Law Professor and OSHA expert, about this nomination."
Michael's has indicated that a change of culture is called for. "What polluters have seen is that the strategy that the tobacco industry came up with, which essentially is questioning the science, find the controversy and magnify that controversy, is very successful in slowing down public health protections. And so the scientists who used to work for the tobacco industry are now working for most major chemical companies. They don't have to show a chemical exposure is safe. All they have to do is show that the other studies are in question somehow. And by raising that level of uncertainty, they throw essentially a monkey wrench into the system."
The agency will next have to be given the necessary tools to permit the culture of safety to flourish. OSHA must become proactive about safety. Congress will now have to act to implement new laws to strengthen OSHA's mission of safety.
Monday, November 30, 2020
Former Head of OSHA to Join Biden-Harris Transition Team
Workforce health continues to be focus of concern by the Biden-Harris Transition team. President-elect Joe Biden announced new members of the Transition COVID-19 Advisory Board.
Friday, October 2, 2009
AAAS Enthusiastically Endorses the Nomination of Dr. David Michael as Assistant Secretary of OSHA
The prestigious, American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) has endorsed the nomination of Dr. David Michaels to become Assistant Secretary of Labor for The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). In a letter to Senator Tom Harkin, Chairman of the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, Albert H. Teich, Director of Science & Policy Programs for AAAS enthusiastically endorsed the Michael’s nomination.
The American Association for the Advancement of Science, "Triple A-S" (AAAS), is an international non-profit organization dedicated to advancing science around the world by serving as an educator, leader, spokesperson and professional association. In addition to organizing membership activities, AAAS publishes the journal Science, as well as many scientific newsletters, books and reports, and spearheads programs that raise the bar of understanding for science worldwide.
Sunday, December 6, 2009
David Michaels Confirmed by US Senate to Head OSHA
David Michaels has been confirmed by the US Senate to head the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). The Senate voted favorably to confirm in a session on December 3, 2009.
Click here to read more about David Michaels and OSHA.
Sunday, March 31, 2013
OSHA Needs To Be Strengthened
Commission on Workmen's Compensation Laws in 1972 reported that safety should be encouraged, and that, "....Economic incentives in the program should reduce the number of work-related· injuries
English: A picture of David Michaels, Assistant Secretary of Labor. (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
***
“"I’m the first to admit this [OSHA] is broken,' said David Michaels, the OSHA director, referring to the agency’s record on dealing with workplace health threats. 'Meanwhile, tens of thousands of people end up on the gurney.'"
Thursday, December 8, 2011
US Department of Labor continues to cite beauty salons and manufacturers for formaldehyde exposure from hair smoothing products
In November, OSHA issued citations and fines to two salons for failing to implement precautions to protect workers from exposure to formaldehyde when using certain hair-smoothing products. Formaldehyde can irritate the eyes and nose; can cause allergic reactions of the skin, eyes and lungs; and is a cancer hazard. Salon owners who decide to use products that may contain or release formaldehyde must follow the requirements of OSHA's formaldehyde and hazard communication standards to keep workers safe.
"We want to make sure that salon owners are aware that if they use these products, they have to implement protective measures such as air monitoring and training," said Assistant Secretary of Labor for OSHA Dr. David Michaels. "What is very troubling to the agency is that some of these products clearly expose workers to formaldehyde even when the label states they are ‘formaldehyde free.'"
OSHA continues to respond to complaints and referrals of formaldehyde exposure in salons, beauty schools and manufacturing facilities. To date in calendar year 2011, federal OSHA has issued citations to 23 salon owners and beauty schools in Connecticut, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Florida, Illinois, New York, New Jersey and Ohio, with fines ranging up to $17,500 for failing to protect workers from overexposure and potential exposure to formaldehyde.
Some of these violations include failing to communicate the hazards of exposure to formaldehyde, provide needed protective equipment and test air levels. The requirements of OSHA's formaldehyde standard can be viewed at http://s.dol.gov/KW. In three separate salons, OSHA's tests showed that workers were exposed to formaldehyde levels above the agency's 15-minute short-term exposure limit, which is 2.0 parts of formaldehyde per million parts of air. In one case, OSHA determined that a hair stylist was exposed to more than five times the allowable amount with an actual exposure reading of 10.12 ppm. In another instance, the exposure reading was 4.73 ppm.
OSHA also has issued citations to two Florida manufacturers and two Florida-based distributors of hair products containing formaldehyde for failing to protect their own workers from possible formaldehyde exposure as well as to communicate the hazards of formaldehyde exposure to salons, stylists and consumers. The violations of OSHA's formaldehyde and hazard communication standards include failing to list formaldehyde as a hazardous ingredient on the material safety data sheet, the hazard warning sheet provided to users such as salon owners and stylists; include proper hazard warnings on product labels; and list the health effects of formaldehyde exposure on the MSDS. Labels must include ingredient and health hazard warning information, and the MSDS must provide users with information on the chemicals in a product, the hazards to workers and how to use the product safely.
"The best way to control exposure to formaldehyde is to use products that do not contain formaldehyde. Salons should check the label or product information to make sure it does not list formaldehyde, formalin, methylene glycol or any of the other names for formaldehyde," said Michaels. "If salon owners decide to use products that contain or release formaldehyde, then they must follow a number of protective practices — including air monitoring, worker training and, if levels are over OSHA limits, good ventilation or respirators."
OSHA already has conducted significant outreach to salons, beauty schools and manufacturers to alert them about the hazards of hair smoothing products and the requirements of OSHA's standards. In late September, OSHA issued a second hazard alert to hair salon owners and workers about potential formaldehyde exposure from working with certain hair smoothing and straightening products, which can be viewed at http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/formaldehyde/hazard_alert.html. This alert, which revised the initial alert issued last spring, was prompted by the results of additional agency inspections, a warning letter issued by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and factually incorrect information recently sent to salons by Brazilian Blowout, a company that manufactures hair products.
In response to the Aug. 24 letter sent by Brazilian Blowout to salon owners claiming that all OSHA air tests performed on the company's Brazilian Blowout Professional Acai Smoothing Solution yielded results below OSHA's standard for exposure, the agency sent a letter to the company refuting that assertion. OSHA's letter can be viewed at http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/formaldehyde/brazilian_blowout_letter.pdf*.
For more information on formaldehyde exposure in salons, visit http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/hairsalons/index.html.
For small businesses in all states across the country, OSHA's On-site Consultation Program offers free and confidential advice for employers seeking help to identify and prevent job hazards or improve their safety and health management systems. In fiscal year 2010, the program provided free assistance to more than 30,000 small businesses covering more than 1.5 million workers across the nation. For more information, visit http://www.osha.gov/dcsp/smallbusiness/consult.html.
"These consultation services are separate from enforcement and do not result in penalties or citations," said Michaels. "Consultants from state agencies or universities work with employers to identify workplace hazards, provide advice on compliance with OSHA standards, and assist in establishing safety and health management systems."
Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, employers are responsible for providing safe and healthful workplaces for their employees. OSHA's role is to ensure these conditions for America's working men and women by setting and enforcing standards, and providing training, education and assistance. For more information, visit http://www.osha.gov.
Related articles
- Women look for frizz-free hair without health risks (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
- OSHA Issues Hazard Alert for Hair Salon Owners & Workers? (futureenv.blogspot.com)
- The Need to Incorporate Occupational Histories Into Electronic Medical Records (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Winners - Safe Workplaces for Everyone photo contest (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Trade Association Labels Formaldehyde Unsafe & Advocates Removal from Hair Straightening Products (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- OSHA Cites Manufacturers and Distributors of Formaldehyde Hair Products (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
Friday, November 1, 2013
OSHA releases new resources to better protect workers from hazardous chemicals
While many chemicals are suspected of being harmful, OSHA's exposure standards are out-of-date and inadequately protective for the small number of chemicals that are regulated in the workplace. The first resource OSHA has created is a toolkit to identify safer chemicals that can be used in place of more hazardous ones. This toolkit walks employers and workers step-by-step through information, methods,
tools and guidance to either eliminate hazardous chemicals or make informed substitution decisions in the workplace by finding a safer chemical, material, product or process. The toolkit is available at http://www.osha.gov/dsg/safer_chemicals/index.html.
"We know that the most efficient and effective way to protect workers from hazardous chemicals is by eliminating or replacing those chemicals with safer alternatives whenever possible," said Dr. David Michaels, assistant secretary of labor for occupational safety and health.
Monday, April 18, 2011
OSHA To Fine Employers for Distracted Driving Accidents
The enforcement program was described by Michaels at a symposium on the prevention of Occupationally-Related Distracted Driving conference hosted by Johns Hopkins University. Following the policy announced by President Obama in his Executive Order banning texting while driving, OSHA is calling upon all employers to ban texting while driving.
It is the intention of OSHA to provide education and enforcement on the issue of distracted driving. OSHA will investigate motor vehicle accidents, including cell phone records, and will issue citations and fine employers where an accident involved texting while driving. While OSHA has juridiction over employers, and not employees, it hopes to encourage all employers to declare motor vehicles a "text free zone."
Related articles
- OSHA at 40 (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Distracted Driving Workers Compensation Claim Draws Major Public Attention (workers-compensation.blogspot.com
- NIOSH Supports Efforts to Ban Distracted Driving
- The Trend to Exclude Distracted Driving from Workers' Compensation Coverage
- Are Driving Distractions Within the Course of the Employment
- Employee Cell Phone Chat Results in $5.2 Million Payment to Worker by Employer
Friday, May 13, 2011
Court Orders Workers Compensation Insurance Carrier to Comply With OSHA Subpoena
Related articles
· OSHA Anniversary April 21, 2011 10:00am C-Span Event (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
· OSHA To Fine Employers for Distracted Driving Accidents (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
· Video of The History of US OSHA (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
· OSHA at 40 (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
· US OSHA Warns Workers of Brazilian Blowout Formaldehyde Hazards (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
Friday, March 5, 2010
OSHA is Listening
The U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) held a public meeting, "OSHA Listens," to solicit comments and suggestions from OSHA stakeholders on key issues facing the agency. The meeting was scheduled for Feb. 10 from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. EST in Washington, D.C.
"Public involvement in the government's activities is a priority for this administration and is important to enhancing OSHA efforts to protect the safety and health of workers," said Assistant Secretary of Labor for OSHA Dr. David Michaels. "This public meeting gives us an opportunity to hear your ideas, suggestions and comments on key issues facing this agency."
Some of the questions OSHA invited public input on included:
- What can the agency do to enhance and encourage the efforts of employers, workers and unions to identify and address workplace hazards?
- What are the most important emerging or unaddressed health and safety issues in the workplace, and what can OSHA do to address these?
- How can the agency improve its efforts to engage stakeholders in programs and initiatives?
- What specific actions can the agency take to enhance the voice of workers in the workplace, particularly workers who are hard to reach, do not have ready access to information about hazards or their rights, or are afraid to exercise their rights?
- Are there additional measures to improve the effectiveness of the agency's current compliance assistance efforts and the on site consultation program, to ensure that small businesses have the information needed to provide safe workplaces?
- Given the length and difficulty of the current OSHA rulemaking process, and given the need for new standards that will protect workers from unaddressed, inadequately addressed and emerging hazards, are there policies and procedures that will decrease the time to issue final standards so that OSHA may implement needed protections in a timely manner?
- As we continue to progress through a new information age vastly different from the environment in which OSHA was created, what new mechanisms or tools can the agency use to more effectively reach high risk employees and employers with training, education and outreach? What is OSHA doing now that may no longer be necessary?
- Are there indicators, other than worksite injuries and illness logs, that OSHA can use to enhance resource targeting?
- In the late 1980s, OSHA and its stakeholders worked together to update the Permissible Exposure Limits (PELs) (exposure limits for hazardous substances; most adopted in 1971), but the effort was unsuccessful. Should updating the PELs be a priority for the agency? Are there suggestions for ways to update the PELs, or other ways to control workplace chemical exposures?
Meeting Agenda
9 a.m. Welcome and Introductory Comments
David Michaels, Assistant Secretary, OSHA
Deborah Berkowitz, Chief of Staff, OSHA
9:10-9:50 Panel 1
Tonya Ford, Uncle killed at ADM facility in 2009
Katherine Rodriguez, Father killed at British Petroleum in 2004
Wanda Morillo, Husband killed in a NJ industrial explosion in 2005
Celeste Monforton, American Public Health Association
Linda Reinstein, Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization
9:50-10:30 Panel 2
Marc Freedman, U.S. Chamber of Commerce
Keith Smith, National Association of Manufacturers
Frank White, ORC
Stephen Sandherr, Association of General Contractors
10:30-10:40 Break
10:40-11:20 Panel 3
Workers United
Peg Seminario, AFL-CIO
Scott Schneider, Laborers' Health and Safety Fund
Mike Wright, United Steel Workers
11:20-11:50 Panel 4
Chris Patton, American Society for Safety Engineers
Katharine Kirkland, Association of Occupational and Environmental Clinics
Aaron Trippler, American Industrial Hygiene Association
11:50-12:30 Panel 5
Kathleen McPhaul, American Public Health Association, Univ. of Maryland Nursing
Hestor Lipscomb, Duke University Medical School
Rick Neitzel, National Hearing Conservation Association
Matt Schudtz, University of Maryland Law School
12:30-1:30 Lunch
1:30-2:00 Panel 6
Karen Harned, Nat'l Federation of Independent Business, Small Business Legal Center
Cynthia Hilton, Institute of Makers of Explosives
Thomas Slavin, Navistar, Inc.
2:00-2:30 Panel 7
Andrew Youpel, Brandenburg Industrial Service Company
Robert Matuga, National Association of Home Builders
Tom Broderick, Construction Safety Council
2:30-3:00 Panel 8
Don Villarejo, California Institute for Rural Studies
Luzdary Giraldo, NY Committee for Occupational Safety and Health
Roger Cook/Peter Dooley, Western NY Council on Occupational Safety and Health
3:00-3:40 Panel 9
Rick Engler, NJ Work Environmental Council
Tom O'Connor, National Council for Occupational Safety and Health
Norman Pflanz, Nebraska Appleseed Center for Law
Chris Trahan, Building and Construction Trades Department
3:40-3:50 Break
3:50-4:10 Panel 10
John Masarick, Independent Electrical Contractors
Davis Layne, VPPPA
4:10-4:40 Panel 11
Bruce Lapham, Valcourt Building Services, LC
Scott A. Mugno, FedEx Express
Marc Kolanz, Brush Wellman Inc.
4:40-5:10 Panel 12
Pamela Vossenas, Unite Here! International
John Morawetz, International Chemical Workers Union Council
Dinkar Mokadam, Association of Flight Attendants-CWA
5:10-5:50 Panel 13
Rick Inclima, International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Jason Zuckerman, Employment Law Group
Richard Renner, National Whistleblowers Center
Tim Sharp, Alaska Review Board & Laborer's Council
Click here to read more about OSHA and workers' compensation.
Friday, January 20, 2012
$1 Million Ordered in Wages and Damages for Retailiation
The U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration has ordered AirTran Airways, a subsidiary of Dallas, Texas-based Southwest Airlines Co., to reinstate a former pilot who was fired after reporting numerous mechanical concerns. The agency also has ordered that the pilot be paid more than $1 million in back wages plus interest and compensatory damages. An investigation by OSHA's Whistleblower Protection Program found reasonable cause to believe that the termination was an act of retaliation in violation of the whistleblower provision of the Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century, known as AIR21.
"Airline workers must be free to raise safety and security concerns, and companies that diminish those rights through intimidation or retaliation must be held accountable," said OSHA Assistant Secretary Dr. David Michaels. "Airline safety is of vital importance, not only to the workers, but to the millions of Americans who use our airways."
The pilot's complaint alleged that the airline removed him from flight status on Aug. 23, 2007, pending an investigative hearing regarding a sudden spike in the pilot's mechanical malfunction reports, or PIREPS. The airline held an internal investigative hearing on Sept. 6, 2007, that lasted 17 minutes. Seven days later, the airline terminated the pilot's employment, claiming that he did not satisfactorily answer a question regarding the spike in reports. OSHA found that the pilot did not refuse to answer any questions during the hearing, answers to questions were appropriate, and the action taken by the airline was retaliatory.
"Retaliating against a pilot for reporting mechanical malfunctions is not consistent with a company that values the safety of its workers and customers," added Michaels. "Whistleblower laws are designed to protect workers' rights to speak out when they have safety concerns, and the Labor Department will vigilantly protect and defend those fundamental rights."
Either party to the case can file an appeal with the Labor Department's Office of Administrative Law Judges, but such an appeal does not stay the preliminary reinstatement order.
AirTran Airways is a subsidiary of AirTran Holdings Inc. with headquarters in Orlando. On May 2, 2011, Southwest Airlines completed the acquisition of AirTran Holdings Inc. and now operates AirTran Airways as a wholly-owned subsidiary.
OSHA enforces the whistleblower provision of AIR21, as well as 20 other statutes protecting employees who report violations of various securities, trucking, workplace health and safety, nuclear, pipeline, environmental, rail, maritime, health care, consumer product and food safety laws.
Employees who believe that they have been retaliated against for engaging in protected conduct may file a complaint with the secretary of labor for an investigation by OSHA's Whistleblower Protection Program.
Detailed information on employee whistleblower rights is available online at http://www.whistleblowers.gov.
Related articles
- AirTran must reinstate pilot who reported problems (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
- AirTran must reinstate pilot who reported problems (cbsnews.com)
- OSHA cites Creamer Sanzari Joint Venture for safety hazards at Passaic River bridge project in Clifton, NJ (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Hostess Fined $105,000 (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- OSHA fines Paterson, NJ, company $126,000 for failing to guard machines and exposing workers to fall and electrical hazards (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
Thursday, November 3, 2011
OSHA: Corporate Fraud Contributed To Nation's Economic Problems
Related articles
- OSHA Seeks Public Comment on SOX Whistleblower Procedures (lawprofessors.typepad.com)
- The Culture of Workers Compensation Needs to Change (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- OSHA Cites Manufacturers and Distributors of Formaldehyde Hair Products (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- US Dept of Labor Moves Aggressively on Misclassification of Employees (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Employer Co-Op Pays OSHA Fines after 26 Industry Employee Deaths (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
Thursday, April 21, 2011
OSHA Anniversary April 21, 2011 10:00am C-Span Event
Related articles
- OSHA at 40 (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- OSHA Advances Recording of Musculoskeletal Disorders (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- US OSHA Warns Workers of Brazilian Blowout Formaldehyde Hazards (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- OSHA To Fine Employers for Distracted Driving Accidents (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Conference- The Triangle Shirtwaist Fire and its Legacy: Out of the Smoke and the Flame (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
Saturday, April 16, 2011
OSHA at 40
OSHA at 40
David Michaels, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health
Peg Seminario, Director of Safety and Health, AFL-CIO
Joseph Van Houten, Senior Director of Worldwide Environment, Health, and Safety, Johnson & Johnson
David Weil, Professor of Economics, Boston University School of Management
Reece Rushing, Director of Government Reform, Center for American Progress
Seating is on a first-come, first-served basis and not guaranteed.
Related articles
- Wal-Mart, Crowd Control, and OSHA's General Duty Clause (scienceblogs.com)
- Distracted Driving Workers Compensation Claim Draws Major Public Attention (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- OSHA Advances Recording of Musculoskeletal Disorders (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Workplace Health and Safety - A Step Backwards (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- Zadroga Fund Cancer Claims Info Sought by NIOSH (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
- US OSHA Warns Workers of Brazilian Blowout Formaldehyde Hazards (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
Saturday, March 27, 2010
David Michaels Testifies That OSHA Needs An Update-Enhance Penalties
"....If we are to fulfill the Department's goal of providing good jobs for everyone, we must make even more progress. Good jobs are safe jobs, and American workers still face unacceptable hazards. More than 5,000 workers are killed on the job in America each year, more than 4 million are injured, and thousands more will become ill in later years from present occupational exposures. Moreover, the workplaces of 2010 are not those of 1970: the law must change as our workplaces have changed. The vast majority of America's environmental and public health laws have undergone significant transformations since they were enacted in the 1960s and 70s, while the OSH Act has seen only minor amendments. As a British statesman once remarked, 'The only human institution which rejects progress is the cemetery.'"
"Monetary penalties for violations of the OSH Act have been increased only once in 40 years despite inflation during that period. Unscrupulous employers often consider it more cost effective to pay the minimal OSHA penalty and continue to operate an unsafe workplace than to correct the underlying health and safety problem. The current penalties do not provide an adequate deterrent. This is apparent when compared to penalties that other agencies are allowed to assess."
"Criminal penalties in the OSH Act are also inadequate for deterring the most egregious employer wrongdoing. Under the OSH Act, criminal penalties are limited to those cases where a willful violation of an OSHA standard results in the death of a worker and to cases of false statements or misrepresentations. The maximum period of incarceration upon conviction for a violation that costs a worker's life is six months in jail, making these crimes a misdemeanor.....Nothing focuses attention like the possibility of going to jail. Unscrupulous employers who refuse to comply with safety and health standards as an economic calculus will think again if there is a chance that they will go to jail for ignoring their responsibilities to their workers...... A fresh look at the OSH Act and its relevance for the 21st century is indeed overdue."Click here to read more about OSHA and workers' compensation.
Saturday, May 4, 2013
OSHA Moves to Protect Temporary Workers
The U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration today announced an initiative to further protect temporary employees from workplace hazards. The announcement was made during a program at the department's headquarters marking Workers' Memorial Day – an annual observance to honor workers who have died on the job and renew a commitment to making work sites across the country safer.
Dr. David Michaels |
OSHA today sent a memorandum to the agency's regional administrators directing field inspectors to assess whether employers who use temporary workers are complying with their responsibilities under the Occupational Safety and Health Act. Inspectors will use a newly created code in their information system to denote when temporary workers are exposed to safety and health violations. Additionally, they will assess whether temporary workers received required training in a language and vocabulary they could understand. The memo, which can be viewed at http://s.dol.gov/ZM, underscores the duty of employers to protect all workers from hazards.
"On Workers' Memorial Day, we mourn the loss of the thousands of workers who die each year on the job from preventable hazards," said Dr. David Michaels, assistant secretary of labor for occupational safety and health. "Many of those killed and injured are temporary workers who often perform the most dangerous jobs have limited English proficiency and are not receiving the training and protective measures required. Workers must be safe, whether they've been on the job for one day or for 25 years."