Fire Kills 16 at Factory Making Shoes for Export

Today's post was shared by Steven Greenhouse and comes from sinosphere.blogs.nytimes.com

A fire tore through a shoe factory in eastern China, killing at least 16 people, and the state media said that the police on Wednesday took into custody the owners of the plant, which makes shoes for export around the world.

The blaze at the plant in Wenling was the latest in a series of deadly industrial accidents in China, casting attention on the poor occupational safety situation in the country. Last summer, 120 people were killed in a fire at a poultry slaughterhouse in northeastern China, in which blocked exits were cited as a cause of the high number of deaths.

Xinhua, the state-run news agency, said that the police took into custody Lin Jianfeng, the legal representative of the plant, and Lin Zhenjian, a shareholder of Taizhou Dadong Shoes Company. Taizhou Dadong exports shoes to five continents and employs 4,580 workers, who produce 50,000 pairs of shoes a day, according to a profile of the company.

Leading Western clothing retailers have come under increased scrutiny for workplace conditions at Asian plants that supply their products, particularly after the collapse of a garment factory in Bangladesh last year killed 1,100 workers. It could not be determined which...


[Click here to see the rest of this post]

Found on

Related articles

• Bangladeshi Factory Owners Charged in Fire That Killed 112 (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Bangladesh Tazreen factory fire: Police charge owners (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Deadly Factory Fire Bares Racial Tensions in Italy (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Death of Apple factory workers highlight safety, underage issues (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Temporary Work, Lasting Harm (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Buying Overseas Clothing, U.S. Flouts Its Own Advice (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)

Supreme Court case highlights U.S. labor agency political divide

Today's post was shared by Steven Greenhouse and comes from www.reuters.com

WASHINGTON/NEW YORK (Reuters) - When the U.S. Supreme Court hears arguments on Monday in a case involving soda bottler Noel Canning Corp., presidential appointment power will be the main dispute, but the case will also put on display one of Washington's most politically polarizing agencies - the National Labor Relations Board.

Created nearly 80 years ago to supervise union elections and protect workers' rights to organize, the NLRB is a battleground for pro-labor Democrats and pro-management Republicans.

Deep disagreement between the two sides over the NLRB's role - and over organized labor itself - makes disputes involving the board uncommonly bitter and subjects its agenda to constant reshaping, depending on which party controls the White House.

"It's no accident ... that this major constitutional showdown is occurring over appointments to the board," said AFL-CIO General Counsel Craig Becker, a former board member.

Monday's case began as a labor dispute. The NLRB found in February 2012 that Noel Canning, a Pepsi bottler in Yakima, Washington, had reneged on a verbal contract during union negotiations. The company appealed to the courts, attracting the support of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, conservative interest groups and Republican leaders in Congress. The case evolved into a constitutional challenge to the president's power to make appointments to key posts without Senate confirmation.

At issue are "recess appointments" made in January 2012 by...


[Click here to see the rest of this post]

Found on

Related articles

• Amazon May Get Its First Labor Union in the U.S.
• NLRB Office of the General Counsel Authorizes Complaints against Walmart, Also Finds No Merit to Other Charges
• Chamber takes aim at worker centers
• Oklahoma Supreme Court Rejects Challenge To Worker's Comp Law - Opt-Out is The Law
• Why The Roberts Court's Anti-Consumer Decisions Are Even Worse Than They Seemed

No Jobs, No Benefits, and Lousy Pay

Today's post was shared by Steven Greenhouse and comes from www.nytimes.com

There is nothing good to say about the December employment report, which showed that only 74,000 jobs were added last month. But dismal as it was, the report came at an opportune political moment. The new numbers rebut the Republican arguments that jobless benefits need not be renewed, and that the current minimum wage is adequate. At the same time, they underscore the need, only recently raised to the top of the political agenda, to combat poverty and inequality. The report showed that average monthly job growth in 2013 was 182,000, basically unchanged from 2012. Even the decline in the jobless rate last month, from 7 percent in November to 6.7 percent, was a sign of weakness: It mainly reflects a shrinking labor force — not new hiring — as the share of workers employed or looking for work fell to the lowest level since 1978. That’s a tragic waste of human capital. It would be comforting to ascribe the dwindling labor force mainly to retirements or other long-term changes, but most of the decline is due to weak job opportunities and weak labor demand since the Great Recession. One result is that the share of jobless workers who have been unemployed for six months or longer has remained stubbornly high. In December, it was nearly 38 percent, still higher by far than at any time before the Great Recession, in records going back to 1948. And yet, nearly 1.3 million of those long-term unemployed had their federal jobless benefits abruptly cut off at the end...

[Click here to see the rest of this post]

Found on

Related articles

• Where the 1.3 million people losing unemployment aid this week live
• Unemployment benefits, the cruelest cut of all
• Jobless Fear Looming Cutoff of Benefits
• Dying Young: Why your Social and Economic Status May be a death sentence in America
• Knasas, The Next Target: Unions expect difficult legislative session in 2014
• NEOC Awards Whistleblower Client Misclassified as Independent Contractor
• NJ COLA Bill Passed by Senate

Unemployment benefits, the cruelest cut of all

Today's post was shared by Steven Greenhouse and comes from www.washingtonpost.com

To 1.3 million jobless Americans: The Republican Party wishes you a Very Unhappy New Year! It would be one thing if there were a logical reason to cut off unemployment benefits for those who have been out of work the longest. But no such rationale exists. On both economic and moral grounds, extending benefits for the long-term unemployed should have received an automatic, bipartisan vote in both houses of Congress. It didn’t. Nothing is automatic and bipartisan anymore, not with today’s radicalized GOP on the scene. In this case, a sensible and humane policy option is hostage to bruised Republican egos and the ideological myth of “makers” vs. “takers.” The result is a cruel blow to families that are already suffering. On Saturday, benefits were allowed to expire for 1.3 million people who have been unemployed more than six months. These are precisely the jobless who will suffer most from a cutoff, since they have been scraping by on unemployment checks for so long that their financial situations are already precarious, if not dire. Extending unemployment benefits is something that’s normally done in a recession, and Republicans correctly point out that we are now in a recovery. But there was nothing normal about the Great Recession, and there is nothing normal about the Not-So-Great Recovery. We are emerging from the worst economic slump since the Depression, and growth has been unusually — and painfully — slow. Only...

[Click here to see the rest of this post]

Found on

Related articles

• Charts: The Worst Long-Term Unemployment Crisis Since the Depression (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Extension of Benefits for Jobless Is Set to End (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Knasas, The Next Target: Unions expect difficult legislative session in 2014 (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• The Appalling Stance of Rand Paul (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• NEOC Awards Whistleblower Client Misclassified as Independent Contractor (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Aid Programs Helped U.S. Survive the Great Recession (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• 10 Reasons That Long-Term Unemployment Is a National Catastrophe (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)

Where the 1.3 million people losing unemployment aid this week live

NJ is going to suffer the most by the termination of the unemployment benefit extension. Today's post was shared by Steven Greenhouse and comes from www.washingtonpost.com

Darker shading means a larger share of a state's population will lose emergency jobless benefits on Saturday. Scroll down for an interactive map. Darker shading means a larger share of a state’s population will lose emergency jobless benefits Saturday. Scroll down for an interactive map. (Committee on Ways and Means Democrats/Labor Department) A projected 1.3 million people will lose emergency unemployment benefits when they expire Saturday. Congress offered the extended benefits as unemployment ballooned during the Great Recession and has put off their expiration 11 times since. Renewing the long-term insurance is a top agenda item for the Senate when it convenes  Jan. 6, Sen. Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) has said. The body is expected to vote quickly on a three-month extension of the benefits. Recipients still face, at best, a delay in their checks and, at worst, a permanent end to them. When the aid expires Saturday, the unemployed will only be able to collect a maximum 26 weeks of benefits in most parts of the U.S., down from about twice as much in many states. The recession may technically be over, but for many the recovery has yet to begin. The plight of the long-term unemployed — a group the benefits are aimed at helping and whose ranks have swelled — has also proven particularly difficult to solve. Studies have shown that they are more likely to suffer mental-health setbacks and are less likely to be...

[Click here to see the rest of this post]

Found on

Related articles

• Jobless Fear Looming Cutoff of Benefits (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Extension of Benefits for Jobless Is Set to End (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Aid Programs Helped U.S. Survive the Great Recession (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• NEOC Awards Whistleblower Client Misclassified as Independent Contractor (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Knasas, The Next Target: Unions expect difficult legislative session in 2014 (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• 10 Reasons That Long-Term Unemployment Is a National Catastrophe (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• The Appalling Stance of Rand Paul (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• NJ COLA Bill Passed by Senate (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)

Made in America: American Workers Honored on a USPS Commemorative Stamp

American Workers - USPS Stamp

The world is moved along, not only by the mighty shoves of its heroes,” social activist Helen Keller wrote in 1908, “but also by the aggregate of the tiny pushes of each honest worker.” The Made in America: Building a Nation Forever® stamps honor the courageous workers who helped build our country.

This issuance features five different panes, each with the same 12 stamps, but anchored by different selvage photos. Three of the selvage images and eleven of the black and white stamp images were taken by photographer Lewis Hine, a chronicler of early 20th-century industry.

The panes are designed in three rows of four stamps. In the top row are an airplane maker, a derrick man on the Empire State Building, a millinery apprentice, and a man on a hoisting ball on the Empire State Building. In the middle row are a linotyper in a publishing house, a welder on the Empire State Building, a coal miner, and riveters on the Empire State Building. (The coal miner stamp is the only one of the 12 that does not feature a Hine photograph. The image is from the Kansas State Historical Society.) In the bottom row are a powerhouse mechanic, a railroad track walker, a textile worker, and a man guiding a beam on the Empire State Building.

On the selvage, Hine's images include two Empire State Building iron workers and a General Electric worker measuring the bearings in a casting. The fourth selvage photograph is the same image of the coal miner that appears in the stamp pane. The final selvage photograph, taken by Margaret Bourke-White, depicts a female welder.

Derry Noyes was the project's art director and designer. The Made in America: Building a Nation stamps are being issued as Forever® stamps in self-adhesive panes of 12. Forever stamps are always equal in value to the current First-Class Mail® one-ounce rate.

Made in the USA.

Issue Date: August 8, 2013

Found on

Related articles

• A California Lesson: How to Kill Workers' Compensation Pill By Pill (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Buying Overseas Clothing, U.S. Flouts Its Own Advice (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Victims of Misclassification (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Charts: Why Fast-Food Workers Are Going on Strike (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Shopping on Thanksgiving kills poor workers' holidays (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Calif. judge wants paint companies to cover cost of lead removal (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Bill aims to protect workers wrongly labeled as independent contractors (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)

Bangladeshi Factory Owners Charged in Fire That Killed 112

Today's post was shared by Steven Greenhouse and comes from www.nytimes.com

NEW DELHI — The police in Bangladesh charged the owners of a garment factory and 11 of their employees with culpable homicide in the deaths of 112 workers in a fire last year that came to symbolize the appalling working conditions in the country’s dominant textile industry. The case is the first time the authorities have sought to prosecute factory owners in Bangladesh’s garment industry, so powerful that the state has long sought to protect owners from unionization efforts by workers and from international scrutiny of working conditions. The fire at the Tazreen Fashions factory on Nov. 24, 2012, was later eclipsed by a building collapse in April that cost the lives of 1,100 workers and brought global attention to the unsafe working conditions and low wages at many garment factories in Bangladesh, the No. 2 exporter of apparel after China. The fire also revealed the poor controls that top retailers had throughout their supply chain, since retailers like Walmart said they were unaware that their apparel was being made in such factories. Among those charged on Sunday were the factory’s owners, Delowar Hossain and his wife, Mahmuda Akther, as well as M. Mahbubul Morshed, an engineer, and Abdur Razzaq, the factory manager, according to local news reports. Bangladeshi officials have been under intense domestic and international pressure to file charges against those deemed responsible for last year’s deaths. Fires have been a persistent problem in...

[Click here to see the rest of this post]

Found on

Related articles

• Bangladesh Tazreen factory fire: Police charge owners (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Arson blamed for huge Bangladesh garment factory fire (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• U.S. Retailers Decline to Aid Factory Victims in Bangladesh (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Europeans Fault American Safety Effort in Bangladesh (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Dozens Hurt in Bangladesh Garment Factory Protest (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• After Bangladesh Factory Collapse, Bleak Struggle for Survivors (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)

The Appalling Stance of Rand Paul

"We have gone from a war on poverty in this country to a war on the poor....." Today's post was shared by Steven Greenhouse and comes from www.nytimes.com

I don’t put much past politicians. I stay prepared for the worst. But occasionally someone says something so insensitive that it catches me flat-footed. Senator Rand Paul, Republican of Kentucky, said Sunday on Fox News: “I do support unemployment benefits for the 26 weeks that they’re paid for. If you extend it beyond that, you do a disservice to these workers.” This statement strikes at the heart — were a heart to exist — of the divide between conservatives and liberals about whether the social safety net provides temporary help for those who hit hard times or functions as a kind of glue to keep them stuck there. Whereas I am sure that some people will abuse any form of help, I’m by no means convinced that this is the exclusive domain of the poor and put-upon. Businesses and the wealthy regularly take advantage of subsidies and tax loopholes without blinking an eye. But somehow, when some poor people, or those who unexpectedly fall on hard times, take advantage of benefits for which they are eligible it’s an indictment of the morality and character of the poor as a whole. The poor are easy to pick on. They are the great boogeymen and women, dragging us down, costing us money, gobbling up resources. That seems to be the conservative sentiment. We have gone from a war on poverty in this country to a war on the poor, in which poor people are routinely demonized and scapegoated and attacked, and conservatives have led the...

[Click here to see the rest of this post]

Found on

Related articles

• Jobless Fear Looming Cutoff of Benefits (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Social Security's Job (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• A Permanent Slump? (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Genetic Tester to Stop Providing Data on Health Risks (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Tech Giants Issue Call for Limits on Government Surveillance of Users (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)
• Wonkbook: Washington is reducing the deficit but abandoning the unemployed (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)

Washington is reducing the deficit but abandoning the unemployed

When injured workers are hurt, employers have the tendency to replace the workers. After temporary disability benefits are exhausted then injured workers traditionally look toward State unemployment funds to survive. Congress is about to severely limit that safety net by drastically reducing unemployment benefits. Today's post was shared by Steven Greenhouse and comes from m.washingtonpost.com

There's one big thing left out of the Murray-Ryan budget deal: unemployment insurance. On December 28, federal jobless benefits expire for 1.3 million workers. These aren't normal unemployment benefits. These are the extended, emergency benefits meant to help the long-term unemployed. A little-known fact about the economy is that short-term unemployment -- the percentage of the labor force unemployed for five weeks or less -- is back down to where it was before the recession. It's long-term unemployment -- which lasts more than 27 weeks -- where the crisis lingers. No one has a very good answer for these workers. They're often stuck in areas of the country where jobs are scarce. They face a vicious cycle of employment discrimination in which employers don't want to hire them because they've been unemployed for so long, which in turn extends their unemployment and makes it even harder for them to find a job. And now we're just cutting them loose.

The Minimum Wage Ain’t What It Used to Be

Today's post was shared by Steven Greenhouse and comes from mobile.nytimes.com

David Neumark is professor of economics and director of the Center for Economics and Public Policy at the University of California, Irvine. Proponents of raising the minimum wage often point out that the real minimum wage is lower now than it was decades ago. But the federal policy aimed at low-wage work and low-income families has shifted — wisely — away from reliance on the minimum wage and toward a generous earned-income tax credit, which is better focused on poor families. There is nothing wrong with reducing our reliance on a less effective policy when we have adopted a more effective one. In fact, we should hope that research on public policy leads to exactly this kind of outcome. The decline in the real value of the minimum wage is indisputable. As shown in the chart below, the real value of the federal minimum declined sharply over the 1980s, and then further in the mid-2000s, before partly recovering with the fairly steep increases in the minimum wage in 2007-9. But despite those increases and low inflation in recent years, it still remains well below its real value in the 1970s. There has been a significant policy shift, however, in how to guarantee a minimally acceptable income to families with low-wage workers. In particular, the earned-income tax credit was instituted in 1976, and its generosity has since been expanded considerably. Through the tax system, the earned-income tax credit pays benefits to families with low income and employed workers. For...

[Click here to see the rest of this post]

Found on

Related articles

• Charts: Why Fast-Food Workers Are Going on Strike
• The Minimum Wage in America Is Pretty Damn Low
• If the minimum wage tracked inflation, it would be $4.07 per hour.
• Better Pay Now
• SeaTac workers celebrate win on $15 minimum wage as opponents request recount